岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 85–94.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210308

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

渤海湾盆地西南部古近系滩坝沉积特征及主控因素

张汶, 吕世聪, 赵大林, 贾海松, 蔡越钎   

  1. 中海石油 (中国) 有限公司天津分公司 渤海石油研究院, 天津 300459
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-18 修回日期:2020-08-05 发布日期:2021-06-03
  • 作者简介:张汶(1983—),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事石油地质方面的研究工作。地址:(300459)天津市滨海新区海川路2121号。Email:zhangwen7@cnooc.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家科技重大专项“渤海油田高效开发示范工程”(编号:2016ZX05058)资助

Sedimentary characteristics and main controlling factors of Paleogene beach bar in southwestern Bohai Bay Basin

ZHANG Wen, LYU Shicong, ZHAO Dalin, JIA Haisong, CAI Yueqian   

  1. Bohai Petroleum Research Institute of Tianjin Branch of CNOOC Limited, Tianjin 300459, China
  • Received:2020-05-18 Revised:2020-08-05 Published:2021-06-03

摘要: 为研究渤海湾盆地西南部古近系东营组和沙河街组滩坝沉积特征及主控因素,开展了岩心观察、薄片鉴定、测井分析、压汞测试等研究,并结合古地貌特征对各类滩坝沉积模式及其差异性进行了综合分析。结果表明:①研究区滩坝类型主要包括砂质滩坝、砾质滩坝、混积滩坝和碳酸盐岩滩坝等4种类型。②物源供给强度、古地貌、古水深及古风浪等4个因素共同控制了滩坝的类型及沉积特征,其中物源供给强度是物质基础,控制了滩坝砂体类型,古地貌与古水深控制了滩坝砂体的厚度和分布位置,古风浪影响了滩坝砂体的展布形态。③砂质滩坝、混积滩坝和碳酸盐岩滩坝储层物性较好,测试产能高,为研究区油气勘探的有利目标。该研究成果可为滩坝储层的油气勘探提供借鉴作用。

关键词: 物源供给, 古地貌, 古水深, 古风浪, 滩坝, 古近系, 渤海湾盆地

Abstract: In order to study the sedimentary characteristics and main controlling factors of Paleogene Dongying Formation and Shahejie Formation in southwestern Bohai Bay Basin,core observation,thin section identification,well logging analysis and mercury injection test were carried out,and combined with the characteristics of paleogeomorphology,sedimentary models of beach bar and their differences were comprehensively analyzed. The results show that: (1)There are four types of beach bar,including sandy beach bar,gravel beach bar, mixed beach bar and carbonate beach bar.(2)The source supply intensity,paleogeomorphology,paleowater depth and paleowind wave jointly control the type and sedimentary characteristics of beach bar. The source supply intensity is the material basis and controls the type of beach bar sand body. The paleogeomorphology and paleowater depth control the thickness and distribution position of beach bar sand body,and paleowind wave affects the distribution form of beach bar sand body.(3)Sandy beach bar,mixed beach bar and carbonate beach bar have good physical properties and high test productivity,which are favorable targets for oil and gas exploration in the study area. The research results can provide reference for oil and gas exploration of beach bar reservoir.

Key words: source supply, paleogeomorphology, paleowater depth, paleowind wave, beach bar, Paleogene, Bohai Bay Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] 文雯, 赵晓东, 刘晓, 等.南堡凹陷南部物源古近系沙一段沉积特征.断块油气田, 2017, 24(3):333-336. WEN W, ZHAO X D, LIU X, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of southern provenance of Paleogene Sha 1 member in Nanpu Sag. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2017, 24(3):333-336.
[2] 毕彩芹, 朱强, 胡志方, 等.渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷沾车地区沙四上亚段湖相碳酸盐岩储层特征. 石油实验地质, 2017, 39(2):203-212. BI C Q, ZHU Q, HU Z F, et al. Characteristics of lacustrine carbonate rocks within the upper section of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua-Chezhen area, Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2017, 39(2):203-212.
[3] 易定红, 王建功, 石兰亭, 等.柴达木盆地英西地区E32碳酸盐岩沉积演化特征.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2):46-55. YI D H, WANG J G, SHI L T, et al. Sedimentary evolution characteristics of E 32 carbonate rocks in Yingxi area, Qaidam Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2):46-55.
[4] 倪祥龙, 黄成刚, 杜斌山, 等. 盆缘凹陷区甜点储层主控因素与源下成藏模式:以柴达木盆地扎哈泉地区渐新统为例. 中国矿业大学学报, 2019, 48(1):153-164. NI X L, HUANG C G, DU B S, et al. Main control factors of dessert reservoirs and patterns of "oil reservoirs below source" in basin margin depression:A case study of Oligocene reservoirs in the Zhahaquan area,Qaidam Basin. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2019, 48(1):153-164.
[5] 陈世悦, 杨剑萍, 操应长.惠民凹陷西部下第三系沙河街组两种滩坝沉积特征.煤田地质与勘探, 2000, 28(3):1-3. CHEN S Y, YANG J P, CAO Y C. Sedimentary characteristics of two kinds of beach-bars of Oligocene Shahejie Formation in western Huimin Depression, China. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2000, 28(3):1-3.
[6] 常德双, 卢刚臣, 孔凡东, 等.大港探区湖泊浅水滩、坝油气藏勘探浅析.石油地质, 2004, 26(2):26-32. CHANG D S, LU G C, KONG F D,et al. Analysis on exploration of lake shallow-water beach and bar oil and gas reservoirs in Dagang exploration area. Petroleum Geology, 2004, 26(2):26-32.
[7] 王蛟, 姜在兴, 陈世悦, 等.渤海湾盆地车镇凹陷沙三-沙一段沉积演化与有利砂体预测. 石油实验地质, 2005, 27(4):371-377. WANG J, JIANG Z X, CHEN S Y, et al. Sedimentary facies evolution and favorable sandstone body prospection in the third to first members of the Shahejie Formation of Paleogene in the Chezhen Sag of the Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2005, 27(4):371-377.
[8] 穆星, 印兴耀, 王孟勇.济阳坳陷储层地震地质综合预测技术研究.石油物探, 2006, 45(4):351-356. MU X, YIN X Y, WANG M Y. The integrated seisrngeology prediction techniques for different reservoir type in Jiyang Depression. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2006, 45(4):351-356.
[9] 姜在兴, 王俊辉, 张元福.滩坝沉积研究进展综述.古地理学报, 2015, 17(4):429-440. JIANG Z X, WANG J H, ZHANG Y F. Advances in beach-bar research:A review. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2015, 17(4):429-440.
[10] 孙钰, 钟建华, 袁向春, 等.国内湖相碳酸盐岩研究的回顾与展望.特种油气藏, 2008, 15(5):1-6. SUN Y, ZHONG J H, YUAN X C, et al. Review and prospect of the study on domestic lacustrine carbonate rocks.Special Oil and Gas Reservoir, 2008, 15(5):1-6.
[11] 杜韫华.渤海湾地区下第三系湖相碳酸盐岩及沉积模式.石油与天然气地质, 1990, 11(4):376-392. DU Y H. Eogene lacustrine carbonate rocks and sedimentary model in Bohai Bay region. Oil & Gas Geology, 1990, 11(4):376-392.
[12] 宋章强, 陈延芳, 刘志刚, 等.渤海海域沙一、二时期碳酸盐岩沉积特征及主控因素分析.沉积与特提斯地质, 2013, 33(1):5-11. SONG Z Q, CHEN Y F, LIU Z G, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and controls of the carbonate rocks during the deposition of the first and second members of the Shahejie Formation in the Bohai sea area. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2013, 33(1):5-11.
[13] 罗晓彤, 文华国, 彭才, 等.巴西桑托斯盆地L油田BV组湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征及高精度层序划分.岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3):68-81. LUO X T, WEN H G, PENG C, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and high-precision sequence division of lacustrine carbonate rocks of BV Formation in L oilfield of Santos Basin, Brazil. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3):68-81.
[14] 杨雨然, 张亚, 谢忱, 等.川西北地区中二叠统栖霞组热液作用及其对储层的影响.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6):44-53. YANG Y R, ZHANG Y, XIE C, et al. Hydrothermal action of Middle Permian Qixia Formation in northwestern Sichuan Basin and its effect on reservoirs. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(6):44-53.
[15] 高胜利, 王连敏, 武玺, 等.渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷齐家务地区沙一下亚段湖相碳酸盐岩储层地球化学特征. 石油实验地质, 2012, 34(3):309-313. GAO S L, WANG L M, WU X, et al. Geochemical characteristics of lacustrine carbonate rocks in lower part of first member of Shahejie Formation in Qijiawu area of Huanghua Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2012, 34(3):309-313.
[16] 王建功, 张道伟, 易定红, 等.柴西地区下干柴沟组上段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征及相模式.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4):1-13. WANG J G, ZHANG D W, YI D H, et al. Depositional characteristics and facies model of lacustrine carbonate rocks in the upper member of lower Ganchaigou Formation in western Qaidam Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4):1-13.
[17] 李得立, 谭先锋, 夏敏全, 等.东营凹陷沙四段湖相白云岩沉积特征及成因.断块油气田, 2010, 17(4):418-422. LI D L, TAN X F, XIA M Q, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and genesis of lacustrine dolomite in the fourth member of Shahejie Formation in Dongying Sag. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2010, 17(4):418-422.
[18] 徐长贵, 赖维成, 薛永安, 等.古地貌分析在渤海古近系储集层预测中的应用.石油勘探与开发, 2004, 31(5):53-56. XU C G, LAI W C, XUE Y A, et al. Palaeogeomorphology analysis for the paleogene reservoir prediction in Bohai Sea area. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2004, 31(5):53-56.
[19] 加东辉, 徐长贵, 杨波, 等.辽东湾辽东带中南部古近纪古地貌恢复和演化及其对沉积体系的控制.古地理学报, 2007, 9(2):155-166. JIA D H, XU C G, YANG B, et al. Paleogene palaeogeomorphology reconstruction and evolution and its control on sedimentary systems in central-southern Liaodong Zone, Liaodongwan Bay. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2007, 9(2):155-166.
[20] 张峰, 崔健健, 邵先杰, 等.高集油田阜宁组湖相碳酸盐岩储层特征.断块油气田, 2015, 22(3):296-300. ZHANG F, CUI J J, SHAO X J, et al. Characteristics of Funing Formation lacustrine carbonate reservoir in Gaoji Oilfield. FaultBlock Oil & Gas Field, 2015, 22(3):296-300.
[1] 黄华, 袁娟梅, 彭伟, 张亮, 文辉. 江汉盆地古近系潜江组盐湖沉积特征与成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 9-16.
[2] 黄芸, 杨德相, 李玉帮, 胡明毅, 季汉成, 樊杰, 张晓芳, 王元杰. 冀中坳陷杨税务奥陶系深潜山储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 70-80.
[3] 向巧维, 李小平, 丁琳, 杜家元. 珠江口盆地珠一坳陷古近系高自然伽马砂岩形成机制及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 93-103.
[4] 关新, 潘树新, 曲永强, 许多年, 张寒, 马永平, 王国栋, 陈雪珍. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷滩坝砂的发现及油气勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 90-98.
[5] 胡贺伟, 李慧勇, 许鹏, 陶莉, 华晓莉. 断裂密集带油气差异富集主控因素探讨——以歧口凹陷歧南断阶带为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 34-45.
[6] 隋立伟. 塔南凹陷古地貌特征对沉积体系和油气分布的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 48-58.
[7] 何康, 张鹏志, 周军良, 甘立琴, 舒晓. 复合曲流带内部构型界面识别新方法及其应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 126-135.
[8] 张亚, 陈双玲, 张晓丽, 张玺华, 谢忱, 陈聪, 杨雨然, 高兆龙. 四川盆地茅口组岩溶古地貌刻画及油气勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 44-55.
[9] 庞小军, 王清斌, 解婷, 赵梦, 冯冲. 黄河口凹陷北缘古近系物源及其对优质储层的控制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 1-13.
[10] 关华, 郭平, 赵春兰, 谭保国, 徐冬梅. 渤海湾盆地永安油田永66区块氮气驱油机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 149-160.
[11] 张家强, 李士祥, 周新平, 梁益财, 郭睿良, 闫灿灿, 陈俊霖, 李树同. 志丹地区长82砂层组缓坡浅水三角洲前缘砂体发育模式及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 36-50.
[12] 赵汉卿, 温慧芸, 穆朋飞, 李超, 吴穹螈. 垦利A油田沙三上段近源辫状河三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 37-44.
[13] 刘恭利, 韩自军, 段新意, 甄宗玉. 薄互层火成岩地震响应特征及厚度预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 105-112.
[14] 刘为, 杨希冰, 张秀苹, 段亮, 邵远, 郝德峰. 莺歌海盆地东部黄流组重力流沉积特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 75-82.
[15] 陈彬滔, 史忠生, 薛罗, 马轮, 赵艳军, 何巍巍, 王磊, 史江龙. 古潜山周缘滩坝沉积模式与岩性油藏勘探实践——以南苏丹Melut盆地Ruman地区Galhak组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 37-44.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张 俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 魏钦廉, 郑荣才, 肖玲, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴旗地区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[3] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[4] 雷卞军,张吉,王彩丽,王晓蓉,李世临,刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[5] 杨杰,卫平生,李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[6] 旷红伟,高振中,王正允,王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[7] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[8] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[9] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[10] 王东琪, 殷代印. 水驱油藏相对渗透率曲线经验公式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 159 -164 .