岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 28–35.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.05.004

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

准南上二叠统芦草沟组非常规油气储层特征

王正和, 余谦   

  1. 中国地质调查局成都地质调查中心, 成都 610081
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-13 修回日期:2017-05-03 出版日期:2017-09-21 发布日期:2017-09-21
  • 第一作者:王正和(1976-),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事沉积层序及油气勘探方面的研究工作。地址:(610083)成都市一环路北三段2号成都地质调查中心。Email:3121927631@qq.com。
  • 通信作者: 余谦(1965-),男,硕士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事油气勘探方面的研究工作。Email:49032646@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区地勘基金项目“新疆准噶尔盆地南缘重点远景区页岩气调查评价”（编号：N13-4-XJ02）资助

Unconventional reservoir characteristics of Upper Permian Lucaogou Formation in southern margin of Junggar Basin

WANG Zhenghe, YU Qian   

  1. Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey, Chengdu 610081, China
  • Received:2017-03-13 Revised:2017-05-03 Online:2017-09-21 Published:2017-09-21

PDF (PC)

408

摘要： 为了深化准噶尔盆地南缘阜康—乌鲁木齐段非常规油气资源的认识，通过野外地质调查、岩心观察、薄片鉴定、样品分析测试等对上二叠统芦草沟组非常规储层特征进行了详细研究。结果表明：构成非常规油气储层的岩石类型有3种，分别为以粉砂岩为主的细粒沉积岩、以黏土岩为主的细粒沉积岩及碳酸盐岩；芦草沟组上段、中段和下段炭质细粒沉积岩密度分别为2.3～2.8g/cm3，2.3～2.4g/cm3和2.4～2.5g/cm3。炭质细粒沉积岩密度与TOC含量具有较好的负相关性，孔隙度以0～2%为主，渗透率以0～0.1mD为主，比表面积以0.1～0.5cm2/g及1.0～2.0cm2/g为主。芦草沟组非常规油气储集空间类型由纳米—微米级微孔和2期构造缝隙构成。

关键词: 东河砂岩, 黏土矿物, 孔喉半径, 水淹变化机理, 哈得逊油田

Abstract: In order to deepen unconventional resources in Fukang-Urumqi zone,southern margin of Junggar Basin, based on field investigation,core observation,slice identification,sample testing,the unconventional reservoir characteristics of Upper Permian Lucaogou Formation were studied. The results show that unconventional reservoir was formed with tree types lithic facies,such as silt-based fine-grained sedimentary rock,clay-based finegrained sedimentary rocks and carbonates. The density of the carbonaceous fine-grained clastic rocks of upper, middle and lower member of Lucaogou Formation are 2.3-2.8 g/cm3,2.3-2.4 g/cm3,2.4-2.5 g/cm3 respectively. Their porosity is dominant with 0-2.0%,and permeability is dominant with 0-0.1mD,specific surface area is dominant with 0.1-0.5 cm2/g and 1.0-2.0 cm2/g. There is an apparent negative correlation between the density and TOC content of fine-grained clastic rock. It is considered that reservoirs space is mainly composed of nanometermicron micropores and two-phases structural fractures.

Key words: Donghe sandstone, clay minerals, pore throat radius, mechanism of waterflooding, Hadeson Oilfield

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 贾承造,郑民,张永峰. 中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景.石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-137. JIA C Z,ZHENG M,ZHANG Y F. Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):129-137.
[2] 邹才能,翟光明,张光亚,等.全球常规-非常规油气形成分布、资源潜力及趋势预测.石油勘探与开发,2015,42(1):13-26. ZOU C N,ZHAI G M,ZHANG G Y,et al. Formation,distribution, potential and prediction of global conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resources. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(1):13-26.
[3] 余琪祥,曹倩,路清华,等. 准噶尔盆地非常规油气资源分布特征及勘探前景. 油气藏评价与开发,2011,1(4):66-72. YU Q X,CAO Q,LU Q H, et al. The distribution characteristics and exploration prospect of the unconventional hydrocarbon resources in Junggar Basin. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2011,1(4):66-72.
[4] 贾承造,邹才能,李建忠,等. 中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景.石油学报,2012,33(3):343-351. JIA C Z,ZOU C N,LI J Z,et al. Assessment criteria,main types,basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China. Acta Petroleum Sinica,2012,33(3):343-351.
[5] 吉鸿杰,邱振,陶辉飞,等. 烃源岩特征与生烃动力学研究——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(4):34-42. JI H J,QIU Z,TAO H F,et al. Source rock characteristics and hydrocarbon generation kinetics:a case study of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag,Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(4):34-42.
[6] 斯春松,陈能贵,余朝丰,等. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组致密油储层沉积特征.石油实验地质,2013,35(5):528-533 SI C S,CHEN N G,YU C F,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of tight oil reservoir in Permian Lucaogou Formation,Jimsar Sag. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2013,35(5):528-533.
[7] 匡立春,胡文瑄,王绪龙,等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油储层初步研究:岩性与孔隙特征分析. 高校地质学报,2013, 19(3):529-535. KUANG L C,HU W X,WANG X L,et al. Research of the tight oil reservoir in the Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag:Analysis of lithology and porosity characteristics. Geological Journal of China Universities,2013,19(3):529-535.
[8] 李红南,毛新军,胡广文,等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油储层特征及产能预测研究. 石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2014,36(10):40-45. LI H N,MAO X J,HU G W,et al. Characteristics and productivity prediction of tight reservoirs in Lucaogou Formation of Jimusar Sag in Junggar Basin. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology (Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute),2014,36(10):40-45.
[9] 邓泳,杨龙,李琼,等. 准噶尔盆地二叠系芦草沟组致密油岩心覆压孔渗变化规律研究. 岩性油气藏,2015,27(1):39-43. DENG Y,YANG L,LI Q,et al. Change rule of porosity and permeability of tight oil core of Permian Lucaogou Formation under reservoir condition in Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015,27(1):39-43.
[10] 匡立春,孙中春,欧阳敏,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组复杂岩性致密油储层测井岩性识别. 测井技术,2013,37(6):638-643. KUANG L C,SUN Z C,OUYANG M,et al. Complication lithology logging identification of the Lucaogou tight oil reservoir in Jimusar Depression. Well Logging Technology,2013,37(6):638-643.
[11] 许效松,汪正江. 对中国海相盆地油气资源战略选区的思路. 海相油气地质,2003,8(1/2):1-9. XU X S,WANG Z J. Thought Clew to Search after Stragegic Prospectiong Precincts of Oil and Gas Resources in Marine Facies Basins in China. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2003,8(1/2):1-9.
[12] 陈新,卢华复,舒良树,等. 准噶尔盆地构造演化分析新进展. 高校地质学报,2002,8(3):257-267. CHEN X,LU H F,SHU L S,et al. Study on tectonic evolution of Junggar Basin. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2002,8(3):257-267.
[13] 赵白. 准噶尔盆地的形成与演化. 新疆石油地质,1992,13(3):191-196. ZHAO B. Formation and evolution of Junggar Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,1992,13(3):191-196.
[14] 蔡忠贤,陈发景,贾振远. 准噶尔盆地的类型和构造演化. 地学前缘,2000,7(4):431-440. CAI Z X,CHEN F J,JIA Z Y. Types and tectonic evolution of Junggar Basin. Earth Science Frontiers,2000,7(4):431-440.
[15] 吴孔友,查明,王绪龙,等. 准噶尔盆地构造演化与动力学背景再认识.地球学报,2005,26(3):217-222. WU K Y,ZHA M,WANG X L,et al. Further researches on the tectonic evolution and dynamic setting of the Junggar Basin. Acta Geoscientica Sinica,2005,26(3):217-222.
[16] 吴绍祖,屈迅,李强. 准噶尔芦草沟组与黄山街组的古气候条件.新疆地质,2002,20(3):183-186. WU S Z,QU X,LI Q. Paleoclimatic conditions of Loucaogou and Huangshanjie Formations in Junggar. Xinjiang Geology, 2002,20(3):183-186.
[17] WARTES M A,GREENE T J,CARROLL A R. Permian lacustrine paleogeography of the Junggar and Turpan-Hami Basins, northwest China. AAPG Annual Convention,Extended Abstracts, 1998,2:682.
[18] 王正和,丁邦春,闫剑飞,等. 准南芦草沟组沉积特征及油气勘探前景. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2016,31(2):25-32. WANG Z H,DING B C,YAN J F,et al. Depositional characteristics and petroleum exploration significance of Lucaogou Formation in south Junggar Basin. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2016,31(2):25-32.
[19] 李丕龙,冯建辉,陆永潮,等. 准噶尔盆地构造沉积与成藏. 北京:地质出版社,2010:191. LI P L,FENG J H,LU Y C, et al. Tectonic sediments and reservoirs of Junggar Basin. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2010:191.
[20] 张传恒,刘典波,张传林,等. 新疆博格达山初始隆升时间的地层学标定.地学前缘,2005,12(1):294-302. ZHANG C H,LIU D B,ZHANG C L,et al. Stratigraphic constraints on the initial uplift age of Bogda Shan,Xinjiang,northwest China. Earth Science Frontiers,2005,12(1):294-302.
[21] 孙自明,沈杰. 新疆博格达推覆构造及其与油气的关系. 石油实验地质,2014,36(4):429-434. SUN Z M,SHEN J. Bogda nappe structure and its relations to hydrocarbon in Xinjiang. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2014,36(4):429-434.
[1] 朱彪, 邹妞妞, 张大权, 杜威, 陈祎. 黔北凤冈地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 147-158.
[2] 程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[3] 白佳佳, 司双虎, 陶磊, 王国庆, 王龙龙, 史文洋, 张娜, 朱庆杰. DES+CTAB复配驱油剂体系提高低渗致密砂岩油藏采收率机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 169-177.
[4] 姚秀田, 王超, 闫森, 王明鹏, 李婉. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新近系馆陶组储层敏感性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 159-168.
[5] 曹江骏, 陈朝兵, 罗静兰, 王茜. 自生黏土矿物对深水致密砂岩储层微观非均质性的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地西南部合水地区长6油层组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 36-49.
[6] 任大忠, 周兆华, 梁睿翔, 周然, 柳娜, 南郡祥. 致密砂岩气藏黏土矿物特征及其对储层性质的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 42-53.
[7] 李闽, 王浩, 陈猛. 致密砂岩储层可动流体分布及影响因素研究——以吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 140-149.
[8] 刘强, 余义常, 江同文, 徐怀民, 昌伦杰, 王超. 哈得逊油田东河砂岩储层水淹变化机理研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 150-159.
[9] 马勇新,雷 霄,张乔良，孟令强. 低渗透油藏有效渗透率计算新模型—— — 以珠江口盆地海相低渗透砂岩为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1): 117-122.
[10] 覃小丽，李荣西，席胜利,李 鑫. 鄂尔多斯盆地东部地区太原组储层黏土矿物特征及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1): 49-57.
[11] 韩登林，张双源，袁文芳，冯志超，欧阳传湘，彭舒琪. 储层速敏效应形成机理及其垂向差异因素分析---以塔北隆起吉拉克地区三叠系储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 19-24.
[12] 马向贤，郑建京,王晓锋，王作栋,吴应忠，钱 宇. 黏土矿物对油气生成的催化作用：研究进展与方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(2): 55-61.
[13] 张安达，王成，乔睿. 致密砂岩储层物性下限确定新方法及系统分类[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(5): 5-8.
[14] 周桦，黄思静，兰叶芳. 华庆地区长6 油层组黏土矿物类型及其对储层物性的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(3): 66-73.
[15] 周康，刘佳庆，段国英，丁磊，周邻丹. 吴起地区长61 油层黏土矿物对油层低电阻率化的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(2): 26-30.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 2022年 34卷 2 期 封面[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] 李在光, 李琳. 以井数据为基础的AutoCAD 自动编绘图方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] 程玉红, 郭彦如, 郑希民, 房乃珍, 马玉虎. 井震多因素综合确定的解释方法与应用效果[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] 刘俊田,靳振家,李在光,覃新平,郭　林,王　波,刘玉香. 小草湖地区岩性油气藏主控因素分析及油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] 王昌勇, 郑荣才, 王建国, 曹少芳, 肖明国. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区下侏罗统八道湾组沉积特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] 王克, 刘显阳, 赵卫卫, 宋江海, 时振峰, 向惠. 济阳坳陷阳信洼陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] 孙洪斌, 张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] 李传亮. 地层抬升会导致异常高压吗?[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] 魏钦廉，郑荣才，肖玲，马国富，窦世杰，田宝忠. 阿尔及利亚438b 区块三叠系Serie Inferiere 段储层平面非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发