哈得逊油田东河砂岩储层水淹变化机理研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.02.019

岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 150–159.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.02.019

哈得逊油田东河砂岩储层水淹变化机理研究

刘强^1,2, 余义常³, 江同文⁴, 徐怀民¹, 昌伦杰², 王超²

1. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
2. 中国石油塔里木油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆库尔勒 841000;
3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
4. 中国石油塔里木油田分公司, 新疆库尔勒 841000

收稿日期:2016-05-22 修回日期:2016-08-02 出版日期:2017-03-21 发布日期:2017-03-21
第一作者:刘强(1970-),男,中国石油大学(北京)在读博士研究生,研究方向为油气田开发地质学。地址:(102249)北京市昌平区中国石油大学地质楼905室。电话:(010)89732003。Email:liuq006@sina.com
通信作者: 徐怀民(1962-),男,博士,教授,主要从事开发地质学的教学和科研工作。Email:xuhm@cup.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项“复杂油气藏精细表征与剩余油分布预测”（编号：2011ZX05009-003）资助

The mechanism of reservoir transition through waterflooding of Donghe sandstone in Hadeson Oilfield

LIU Qiang^1,2, YU Yichang³, JIANG Tongwen⁴, XU Huaimin¹, CHANG Lunjie², WANG Chao²

1. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla 841000, Xinjiang, China;
3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
4. PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla 841000, Xinjiang, China

Received:2016-05-22 Revised:2016-08-02 Online:2017-03-21 Published:2017-03-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了更加高效地封堵哈得逊油田东河砂岩储层水淹后的优势通道，利用各类岩心分析资料及水淹解释结论，对哈得逊油田东河砂岩储层的岩石学、孔喉结构类型、储层水淹变化规律及机理进行了研究。结果表明：哈得逊油田东河砂岩储层黏土矿物绝对含量低，大部分为速敏性的高岭石与伊利石，粒径主要为1～2 μm，储层可分为孔喉半径小于2 μm的细微喉-低渗储层、孔喉半径介于2～5 μm的细喉-中渗储层及孔喉半径大于5 μm的中细喉-高渗储层；水淹后黏土矿物的堵塞和迁出是导致储层物性变化的原因，而黏土矿物粒径大小与喉道尺寸的匹配程度控制了储层水淹前后及不同水淹程度下物性变化的方向。这些因素造成了3 类储层的水淹变化机理：细微喉-低渗储层水淹后孔、渗值下降，由原状储层至低水淹逐渐减小，到中水淹时有所增大，高水淹时最小；细喉-中渗储层水淹后孔、渗值上升，由低水淹至中水淹逐渐增大，到高水淹时有所减小；中细喉-高渗储层水淹后孔、渗值增大，且随着水淹程度的增高而增大，该类储层即优势通道发育所在，可采用粒径为3～4 μm的微球对其进行高效、精准的封堵。研究区注水开发后剩余油规模较大，开展储层水淹变化机理研究，具有重要的现实意义。

Abstract: In order to block the dominate pathway after waterflooding in Donghe sandstone reservoir of Hadeson Oilfield efficiently,the data of reservoir physical properties,mercury injection,cast thin sections,clay mineral Xray diffraction,scanning electronic microscope and waterflooding interpretation conclusions,were used to study the petrologic features,pore throat structure,reservoir transition rule and mechanism after waterflooding in Donghe sandstone reservoir. The results show that the absolute content of clay mineral Donghe sandstone reservoir is low, and most clay minerals are kaolinite and illite with velocity sensitivity,and range from 1 to 2 μm in grain size.Donghe sandstone reservoir can be divided into three types:thin-micro throat and low permeability reservoir with throat radius less than 2 μm,thin throat and middle permeability reservoir with throat radius of 2-5 μm,and middlethin throat and high permeability reservoir with throat radius larger than 5 μm. Clay mineral block and migration after waterflooding are the reasons for the change of reservoir physical properties. The matching of clay mineral grain size and throat radius controls the reservoir transition rule after waterflooding. There are three kinds of mechanism:the porosity and permeability of thin-micro throat and low permeability reservoir decrease after waterflooding,and they decrease from original to low waterflooding,then slightly increase till middle waterflooding, and decrease again in high waterflooding. The porosity and permeability of thin throat and middle permeability reservoir firstly increase,then increase higher and decrease in high waterflooding. The porosity and permeability of middle-thin throat and high permeability reservoir increase with the increase of waterflooding degree, and this type of reservoir is favorable for advantageous pathway development. There are a large number of residual oil after waterflooding,therefore in the study area,so it is of significance to conduct reservoir transition rule and mechanism research after waterflooding.

中图分类号:

TE34

刘强, 余义常, 江同文, 徐怀民, 昌伦杰, 王超. 哈得逊油田东河砂岩储层水淹变化机理研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 150–159.

LIU Qiang, YU Yichang, JIANG Tongwen, XU Huaimin, CHANG Lunjie, WANG Chao. The mechanism of reservoir transition through waterflooding of Donghe sandstone in Hadeson Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(2): 150–159.

参考文献

[1] 李国玉,陈启林,白云来,等. 再论海相沉积是中国石油工业未来的希望.岩性油气藏,2014,26(6):1-7. LI G Y,CHEN Q L,BAI Y L,et al. Marine sediment:the future expectation of China's petroleum industry. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014,26(6):1-7.
[2] OCTAVIN C. Principles of sequence stratigraphy. Alberta:Elsevier Science,2006:131-156.
[3] SAMIR M Z. Provenance,diagensis,tectonic setting and reservoir quality of the sandstones of the Ka-reem formation,gulf of Suez,Egypt. Journal of African Earth Science,2013,85(2):31-52.
[4] 贾进华,邹才能. 中国古生代海相碎屑岩储层与油气藏特征. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2012,37(2):55-66. JIA J H,ZOU C N. Reservior and oilgas pool characteristics of Paleozoic marine clastic rocks in China. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences,2012,37(2):55-66.
[5] 孙龙德,江同文,徐汉林,等. 塔里木盆地哈得逊油田非稳态油藏. 石油勘探与开发,2009,36(1):62-67. SUN L D,JIANG T W,XU H L,et al. Unsteady reservoir in Hadson Oilfield,Tarim Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009,36(1):62-67.
[6] 焦翠华,王海更,牛玉杰,等. 塔里木盆地哈得4 油田东河砂岩层序地层界面类型及测井识别方法. 石油与天然气地质, 2007,28(1):69-76. JIAO C H,WANG H G,NIU Y J,et al. Sequence boundary types and logging identification of Donghe sandstone in HD4 oilfield,Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology,2007,28(1):69-76.
[7] 韩如冰,刘强,江同文,等. 钙质隔夹层特征、成因及分布—— 以塔里木盆地哈得油田东河砂岩为例. 石油勘探与开发, 2014,41(4):428-437. HAN R B,LIU Q,JIANG T W,et al. Feature,origin and distribution of calcareous interlayers:a case of Donghe sandstone in Hade Oil Field,Tarim Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014,41(4):428-437.
[8] 赵洪,罗晓容,肖中尧,等. 塔里木盆地哈得逊油田东河砂岩隔夹层特征及其石油地质意义. 天然气地球科学,2014,25 (6):824-833. ZHAO H,LUO X R,XIAO Z Y,et al. Interlayer features and petroleum geology meaning of donghe sandstones in the Hadeson Oilfield. Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(6):824-833.
[9] 韩如冰,田昌炳,徐怀民,等. 海相碎屑岩中高含水期储层性质变化及微观机理——以东河1 油田东河砂岩为例. 中国矿业大学学报,2015,44(4):679-687. HAN R B,TIAN C B,XU H M,et al. Quality change of marine sandstone reservoir in mediumhigh water-cut stage and its microscopic mechanism:a case from Donghe sandstone in Donghe 1 oilfield. Journal of China University of Mining Technology, 2015,44(4):679-687.
[10] 张水昌,张斌,杨海军,等. 塔里木盆地喜马拉雅晚期油气藏调整与改造.石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):668-680. ZHANG S C,ZHANG B,YANG H J,et al. Adjustment and alteration of hydrocarbon reservoirs during the late Himalayan period,Tarim Basin,NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012,39(6):668-680.
[11] 孙玉善,申银民,徐迅,等. 应用成岩岩相分析法评价和预测非均质性储层及其含油性——以塔里木盆地哈得逊地区为例.沉积学报,2002,20(1):55-60. SUN Y S,SHEN Y M,XU X,et al. Evaluating and predicting heterogeneous reservoirs and its oil-bearing properties by the analysis technique of the diagenetic lithofacies—taking Hadexun area in Tarim Basin as an example. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2002,20(1):55-60.
[12] 申银民,贾进华,齐英敏,等. 塔里木盆地上泥盆统—下石炭统东河砂岩沉积相与哈得逊油田的发现. 古地理学报,2011, 13(3):279-286. SHEN Y M,JIA J H,QI Y M,et al. Sedimentary facies of Donghe sandstone in the Upper Devonian-Lower Carboniferous and discovery of Hadexun Oilfield in Tarim Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography,2011,13(3):279-286.
[13] HOLLAND KT,ELMORE PA.Areview of heterogeneous sediments in coastal environments. Earth-Science Reviews,2008, 89(3/4):116-134.
[14] 李彦婧,高潮,邓杰,等. 东—韩地区延长组长2 油层组储层孔隙结构特征.岩性油气藏,2012,24(1):52-56. LI Y J,GAO C,DENG J,et al. Characteristics of pore structure of Chang 2 oil reservoir set of Yanchang Formation in Dong-Han area. Lithologic Reservoirs,2012,24(1):52-56.
[15] 周桦,黄思静,兰叶芳. 华庆地区长6 油层组黏土矿物类型及其对储层物性的影响.岩性油气藏,2012,24(3):66-73. ZHOU H,HUANG S J,LAN Y F. Types of clay minerals and its effects on reservoir properties of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Huaqing area,Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2012,24(3): 66-73.
[16] 高印军,李才雄,王大兴,等. 水淹层测井解释技术研究与应用.石油勘探与开发,2001,28(5):42-45. GAO Y J,LI C X,WANG D X,et al. Well logging interpretation for water flooded zone. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2001,28(5):42-45.
[17] 赵晓东,杨少春,钟思瑛,等. 注水开发油田黏土矿物变化及其对剩余油形成影响.矿物学报,2014,34(4):591-598. ZHAO X D,YANG S C,ZHONG S Y,et al. Distribution of clay minerals and their effect on the formation of remaining oil in a water injection oilfield. Acta Mineralogica Sinica,2014,34(4): 591-598.
[18] 吴胜和,蔡正旗,施尚明,等. 油矿地质学.4 版. 北京:石油工业出版社,2011:427-430. WU S H,CAI Z Q,SHI S M,et al. Oil reservoir geology. 4th ed. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2011:427-430.
[19] 董利飞,岳湘安,苏群,等. 非均质储层水驱剩余油分布及其挖潜室内模拟研究.石油钻采工艺,2015,37(6):63-66. DONG L F,YUE X A,SU Q,et al. Distribution of remaining oil by water flooding in heterogeneous reservoirs and indoorsimulation study for its potential tapping. Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2015,37(6):63-66.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

哈得逊油田东河砂岩储层水淹变化机理研究

The mechanism of reservoir transition through waterflooding of Donghe sandstone in Hadeson Oilfield

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[2]	王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169.
[3]	杨兆臣, 卢迎波, 杨果, 黄纯, 弋大琳, 贾嵩, 吴永彬, 王桂庆. 中深层稠油水平井前置CO₂蓄能压裂技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 178-184.
[4]	岳世俊, 刘应如, 项燚伟, 王玉林, 陈汾君, 郑长龙, 景紫岩, 张婷静. 一种水侵气藏动态储量和水侵量计算新方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 153-160.
[5]	赵长虹, 孙新革, 卢迎波, 王丽, 胡鹏程, 邢向荣, 王桂庆. 薄层超稠油驱泄复合开发蒸汽腔演变物理模拟实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 161-168.
[6]	吕栋梁, 杨健, 林立明, 张恺漓, 陈燕虎. 砂岩储层油水相对渗透率曲线表征模型及其在数值模拟中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 145-159.
[7]	丁超, 王攀, 秦亚东, 梁向进, 郑爱萍, 李宁, 邢向荣. 基于非稳态热传导的SAGD开发指标预测模型[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 160-168.
[8]	马奎前, 刘东, 黄琴. 渤海旅大油田新近系稠油油藏水平井蒸汽驱油物理模拟实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 152-161.
[9]	孟智强, 葛丽珍, 祝晓林, 王永平, 朱志强. 气顶边水油藏气/水驱产油量贡献评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 162-170.
[10]	宋传真, 马翠玉. 塔河油田奥陶系缝洞型油藏油水流动规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 150-158.
[11]	李甜, 代宗仰, 李阳, 黄蕾, 宫振超, 赵晓阳, 周晓龙, 黄澜. 辽河西部凹陷雷家地区古近系沙四段湖相白云岩成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 75-85.
[12]	李冬梅, 李会会, 朱苏阳, 李涛. 断溶体油气藏流动物质平衡方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 154-162.
[13]	毛志强, 张雯, 吴春洲, 陈立峰, 陈亚东, 李岗, 曾慧勇, 刘靓. 纵向双层缝洞油藏橡胶颗粒调流适应性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 172-180.
[14]	李传亮, 王凤兰, 杜庆龙, 由春梅, 单高军, 李斌会, 朱苏阳. 砂岩油藏特高含水期的水驱特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 163-171.
[15]	孔垂显, 巴忠臣, 崔志松, 华美瑞, 刘月田, 马晶. 火山岩油藏压裂水平井应力敏感产能模型[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 166-175.