岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 116–123.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180514

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

透镜体低渗透岩性油藏合理井网井距研究

陶帅1,2, 郝永卯2, 周杰2, 曹小朋3, 黎晓舟2   

  1. 1. 中国石油长庆油田分公司 第二采气厂, 陕西 榆林 719000;
    2. 中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院, 山东 青岛 266580;
    3. 中国石化胜利油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 山东 东营 257000
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-15 修回日期:2018-02-05 出版日期:2018-09-14 发布日期:2018-09-14
  • 作者简介:陶帅(1993-),男,硕士,主要从事油气田产能建设以及开发潜力研究方面的工作。地址:(719000)陕西省榆林市榆阳区长庆油田分公司第二采气厂。Email:marshall1219@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项“渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷致密油开发示范工程”(编号:2017ZX05072006)资助

Reasonable pattern well spacing deployment of lens lithologic reservoirs with low permeability

TAO Shuai1,2, HAO Yongmao2, ZHOU Jie2, CAO Xiaopeng3, LI Xiaozhou2   

  1. 1. No.2 Gas Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Yulin 719000, Shaanxi, China;
    2. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum(Huadong), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Shengli Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Dongying 257000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2017-12-15 Revised:2018-02-05 Online:2018-09-14 Published:2018-09-14

摘要: 透镜体低渗透岩性油藏具有砂体分布零散、非均质性强等特点,开发过程中核部水淹严重,扇缘部水驱效果较差。为此,基于油藏工程方法与理论推导,确立了环形井网环距及采油井井距的计算方法并绘制了计算图版,同时,结合数值模拟方法,对透镜体低渗透岩性油藏有效开发的合理井网井距进行了研究。结果表明:基于相控剩余油条件下的核注翼采井网模式,可有效缓解正方形面积注水井网形式注水憋压的难题,进而降低注水难度,提高水驱效率;与正对井网相比,采用注采井数比为1∶2的核注翼采交错环形井网时,油水井流线分布较均匀,开发效果较好;对于3注6采与4注8采的环形井网,当环距为200 m时,最优采油井井距分别为300 m和250 m。该研究成果为透镜体低渗透岩性油藏的持续高效开发提供了理论基础和借鉴。

关键词: 低渗透岩性油藏, 井网井距, 环形井网, 数值模拟, 流线分布

Abstract: The lens lithologic reservoir with low permeability is characterized by scattered distribution and strong heterogeneity of sand body. During the process of development,the core is seriously flooded and the water flooding effect in fan edge is poor. Therefore,based on the method and theory of reservoir engineering,the calculation methods of ring spacing of annular wells and well spacing of oil well were established,and the calculation chart was drawn. At the same time, the rational pattern well spacing for lens lithologic reservoir with low permeability was studied by numerical simulation method. The results show that the well pattern of core injection wing production based on the phase control residual oil can effectively alleviate the problem of water injection pressure in the form of square water injection well pattern,and then reduce the difficulty of water injection and improve the efficiency of water flooding. Compared with the positive well pattern,when the injection to producing well ratio is 1:2 in the cross annular well pattern of core injection wing production,the streamline distribution of the oil and water wells is more uniform,and the development effect is better. For the annular well pattern with the injection and production wells number of 3 and 6 or 4 and 8,when the ring distance is 200 m,the optimum well spacing of production wells is 300 m and 250 m,respectively. This study can provide a theoretical basis and reference for continuous and efficient development of lens lithologic reservoirs with low permeability.

Key words: low permeability lithologic reservoir, pattern well spacing, annular well pattern, numerical simulation, streamline distribution

中图分类号: 

  • TE312
[1] LEVORSEN A I. The obscure and subtle trap. AAPG Bulletin, 1966,50(10):2058-2067.
[2] 郭元岭,赵乐强,石红霞,等.济阳坳陷探明石油地质储量特点分析.石油勘探与开发,2001,28(3):33-36. GUO Y L,ZHAO L Q,SHI H X,et al. Characteristic analyses of proven OOIP in Jiyang Depression. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2001,28(3):33-36.
[3] 漆滨汶,林春明,邱桂强,等.东营凹陷古近系沙河街组砂岩透镜体钙质结壳形成机理及其对油气成藏的影响.古地理学报,2006,8(4):519-530. QI B W,LIN C M,QIU G Q,et al. Formation mechanism of calcareous incrustation in lenticular sandbody of the Shahejie Formation of Paleogene and its influence on hydrocarbon accumulation in Dongying Sag. Journal of Palaeogeography,2006,8(4):519-530.
[4] 曾溅辉,张善文,邱楠生,等.济阳坳陷砂岩透镜体油气藏充满度大小及其主控因素.地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 2002,27(6):729-732. ZENG J H,ZHANG S W,QIU N S,et al. Degree of oil-gas charged in lens-shaped sand body in Jiyang Depression and its main controlling factors. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2002,27(6):729-732.
[5] 张俊,庞雄奇,姜振学,等.东营凹陷砂岩透镜体油气成藏机理及有利区预测.地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2006,31(2):250-256. ZHANG J,PANG X Q,JIANG Z X,et al. Main accumulation controlling factors and forecast of sand lens reservoir,Dongying Depression,China. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2006,31(2):250-256.
[6] 张云峰,付广,于建成. 砂岩透镜体油藏聚油机理及成藏模式.断块油气田,2000,7(2):12-14. ZHANG Y F,FU G,YU J C. Accumulation mechanism of sand lens reservoir and its generation model. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2000,7(2):12-14.
[7] 马中良,曾溅辉,张善文,等.砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析.岩性油气藏,2008,20(1):69-74. MA Z L,ZENG J H,ZHANG S W,et al. Migration and accumulation mechanism of sand lens reservoirs and its main controlling factors. Lithologic Reservoirs,2008,20(1):69-74.
[8] 李阳,曹刚.胜利油田低渗透砂岩油藏开发技术.石油勘探与开发,2005,32(1):123-126. LI Y,CAO G. Development technology for low-permeability sandstone reservoir in Shengli Oilfield. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2005,32(1):123-126.
[9] 李炼民,赵坤山.低渗透油藏合理井网型式与油砂体适应性研究.内蒙古石油化工,2008(2):91-93. LI L M,ZHAO K S. Research on adaptability of well pattern type and oil sand body of low permeability reservoir. Inner Mongulia Petrochemical Industry,2008(2):91-93.
[10] 周书院,陈雷,解立春,等.安塞油田长6油藏井网适应性研究. 石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2008,30(1):292-295. ZHOU S Y,CHEN L,XIE L C,et al. Study on well pattern adaptability of Chang 6 oil reservoir in Ansai Oilfield. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology(Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute),2008,30(1):292-295.
[11] 李松泉,唐曾熊. 低渗透油田开发的合理井网. 石油学报, 1998,19(3):52-55. LI S Q,TANG Z X. The reasonable well pattern for development low permeability oil fields. Acta Petrolei Sinica,1998,19(3):52-55.
[12] 赵金钟,王建华,邹伟杰,等.低渗透油田井网形式研究及实践.石油地质与工程,2006,20(5):46-48. ZHAO J Z,WANG J H,ZHOU W J,et al. Research and practice of well pattern in low permeability oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2006,20(5):46-48.
[13] 程芳,姚凤英,陈秀兰.数值模拟方法在江汉油田低渗透油藏井网部署中的应用.江汉石油职工大学学报,2010,23(2):88-92. CHENG F,YAO F Y,CHEN X L. On application of numerical simulating method to low permeability reservoir well pattern's deployment in Jianghan Oilfield. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum University of Staff and Workers,2010,23(2):88-92.
[14] 夏景生,王志坤,陈刚,等.东营凹陷东部深层浊积扇油藏成藏条件与模式研究.岩性油气藏,2009,21(1):55-60. XIA J S,WANG Z K,CHEN G,et al. Accumulation condition and model of turbidite fan reservoir in eastern Dongying Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(1):55-60.
[15] KATZ B J. Factors controlling the development of lacustrine petroleum source rocks-an update. Research,1995:61-79.
[16] 张鹏飞.东营凹陷洼陷带沙三中亚段浊积岩成藏条件分析. 岩性油气藏,2012,24(3):61-65. ZHANG P F. Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of turbidite in the middle sub-member of the third member of Shahejie Formation in sub-depression belt of Dongying Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs,2012,24(3):61-65.
[17] 刘玉忠.东营凹陷沙三段浊积岩油藏形成机制.油气地质与采收率,2008,15(2):16-19. LIU Y Z. Formation mechanism of turbidite reservoir of the third member of Shahejie Formation in Dongying Sag. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2008,15(2):16-19.
[18] 卓勤功,蒋有录,隋风贵.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷砂岩透镜体油藏成藏动力学模式.石油与天然气地质,2006,27(5):620-629. ZUO Q G,JIANG Y L,SUI F G. Research on pattern of reservoiring dynamics in sand lens reservoirs in Dongying Sag. Oil & Gas Geology,2006,27(5):620-629.
[19] 曾溅辉,张善文,邱楠生,等.东营凹陷岩性圈闭油气充满度及其主控因素.石油与天然气地质,2003,24(3):219-222. ZENG J H,ZHANG S W,QIU N S,et al. Trap fill of lithologic pools and its main controlling factors in Dongying Sag. Oil & Gas Geology,2003,24(3):219-222.
[20] 侯建锋.安塞特低渗透油藏合理开发井网系统研究.石油勘探与开发,2000,27(1):72-75. HOU J F. Study on reasonable development well network system of Ansai extra low permeability reservoir. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2000,27(1):72-75.
[21] 丁云宏,陈作,曾斌,等.渗透率各向异性的低渗透油藏开发井网研究.石油学报,2002,23(2):64-67. DING Y H,CHEN Z,ZENG B,et al. Development of well pattern in low permeability reservoir with permeability anisotropy. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2002,23(2):64-67.
[22] 崔连可,单敬福,李浮萍,等.基于稀疏井网条件下的古辫状河道心滩砂体估算——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例.岩性油气藏,2018,30(1):155-164. CUI L K,SHAN J F,LI F P,et al. Estimating method of braided channel bar under sparse well net:a case from Su X block in Sulige Gas Field. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(1):155-164.
[1] 朱苏阳, 李冬梅, 李传亮, 李会会, 刘雄志. 再谈岩石本体变形的孔隙度不变原则[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 180-188.
[2] 刘明明, 王全, 马收, 田中政, 丛颜. 基于混合粒子群算法的煤层气井位优化方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 164-171.
[3] 关华, 郭平, 赵春兰, 谭保国, 徐冬梅. 渤海湾盆地永安油田永66区块氮气驱油机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 149-160.
[4] 周瑞, 苏玉亮, 马兵, 张琪, 王文东. 随机分形体积压裂水平井CO2吞吐模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 161-168.
[5] 龙明, 刘英宪, 陈晓祺, 王美楠, 于登飞. 基于曲流河储层构型的注采结构优化调整[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 145-154.
[6] 卞晓冰, 侯磊, 蒋廷学, 高东伟, 张驰. 深层页岩裂缝形态影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 161-168.
[7] 李继庆, 刘曰武, 黄灿, 高大鹏. 页岩气水平井试井模型及井间干扰特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 138-144.
[8] 苏皓, 雷征东, 张荻萩, 李俊超, 鞠斌山, 张泽人. 致密油藏体积压裂水平井参数优化研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4): 140-148.
[9] 马力, 欧阳传湘, 谭钲扬, 王长权, 宋岩, 林飞. 低渗透油藏CO2驱中后期提效方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 139-145.
[10] 杨哲, 刘威, 胡自多, 王述江, 韩令贺, 王艳香. 时空域波动方程混合网格有限差分数值模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 93-109.
[11] 岳世俊, 郑长龙, 杨兆平, 景紫岩, 刘雄志, 金保中. 枚举平衡法在油藏数值模拟初始化中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6): 142-147.
[12] 刘超, 李云鹏, 张伟, 冯海潮, 王颍超. 渤海海域A油田夹层控制下的剩余油分布模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 148-154.
[13] 张建兴, 林承焰, 张宪国, 孙志峰, 陈家昀. 基于储层构型与油藏数值模拟的点坝储层剩余油分布研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 146-153.
[14] 周志军,薛江龙,赵立斌. 数值模拟拟合精度方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1): 101-105.
[15] 魏洪涛. 辽中凹陷北部东二下亚段湖底扇沉积数值模拟及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 183-188.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄思静,黄培培,王庆东,刘昊年,吴 萌,邹明亮. 胶结作用在深埋藏砂岩孔隙保存中的意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 7 -13 .
[2] 刘震, 陈艳鹏, 赵阳,, 郝奇, 许晓明, 常迈. 陆相断陷盆地油气藏形成控制因素及分布规律概述[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 121 -127 .
[3] 冯心远,王宇超,胡自多,李 斐,邵喜春. 基于叠后地震记录求取整形算子的叠前资料拼接技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 93 -96 .
[4] 丁超,郭兰,闫继福. 子长油田安定地区延长组长6 油层成藏条件分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1): 46 -50 .
[5] 李彦山,张占松,张超谟,陈鹏. 应用压汞资料对长庆地区长6 段储层进行分类研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 91 -93 .
[6] 罗 鹏,李国蓉,施泽进,周大志,汤鸿伟,张德明. 川东南地区茅口组层序地层及沉积相浅析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(2): 74 -78 .
[7] 潘建国,卫平生,张虎权,谭开俊. 地震储层学与相关学科的比较[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 1 -4 .
[8] 左国平,屠小龙,夏九峰. 苏北探区火山岩油气藏类型研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(2): 37 -41 .
[9] 邢二涛,张云锋. 水平井开发技术在贝中区N1 段应用研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(Z1): 93 -95 .
[10] 王飞宇. 提高热采水平井动用程度的方法与应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(Z1): 100 -103 .