岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 89–97.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180611

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

马头营凸起馆二段窄薄河道砂体地震识别

张建坤1, 吴鑫1, 方度1, 王方鲁1, 高文中1, 陈小军2   

  1. 1. 中国石油冀东油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 河北 唐山 063004;
    2. 陕西省煤层气开发利用有限公司 地质研究院分公司, 西安 710065
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-27 修回日期:2018-03-20 出版日期:2018-11-16 发布日期:2018-11-16
  • 作者简介:张建坤(1984-),男,博士,工程师,主要从事地震资料构造解释、地震沉积学和地震岩石物理方面的研究工作。地址:(063004)河北省唐山市路北区新华西道101号冀东油田第一科研楼。Email:sparkler1984@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家重大科技专项“南堡凹陷油气富集规律与增储领域”(编号:2016ZX05006-006)资助

Seismic identification of narrow and thin channel sandbodies of the second member of Guantao Formation in Matouying Uplift

ZHANG Jiankun1, WU Xin1, FANG Du1, WANG Fanglu1, GAO Wenzhong1, CHEN Xiaojun2   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Jidong Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Tangshan 063004, Hebei, China;
    2. Branch of Geological Research Institute, Shaanxi Coalbed Methane development and utilization Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710065, China
  • Received:2017-12-27 Revised:2018-03-20 Online:2018-11-16 Published:2018-11-16

摘要: 南堡凹陷马头营凸起馆陶组二段(Ng2)河道砂体单砂层厚度薄、宽度窄,河道砂体地震识别难度大。综合运用面元小网格化叠前偏移处理、古地貌恢复、高频等时地层划分与对比及岩心-测井相分析技术、“地震线描”河道砂体追踪、层控波阻抗反演和振幅地层切片等技术对马头营凸起Ng2 Ⅴ砂层组窄薄河道砂体进行识别。结果表明,地震资料面元尺度由15 m×30 m缩小为7.5 m×7.5 m,提高了地震资料垂向和横向分辨率,增强了曲流河窄薄河道砂体边界识别能力;馆二段为明显的曲流河“二元结构”沉积,岩性具河道沉积与泛滥平原沉积“砂泥间互”的特征;短期沉积旋回控制着不同沉积砂体的分布,上升半旋回中下部和下降半旋回上部河道砂体较发育;Ng2 Ⅴ砂层组地震相分析揭示河道状、不规则圆弧状振幅或波阻抗异常体为曲流河河道沉积和点坝砂复合体,预测河道总体上呈北东—南西和近南北向展布。预测结果与钻井实测结果吻合度高,表明窄薄河道砂体地震识别结果真实、可靠。

关键词: 窄薄河道砂体, 面元小网格化, 叠前偏移处理, 地震相分析, 馆陶组, 马头营凸起

Abstract: Channel sandbody of the second member of Guantao Formation is narrow and thin in Matouying Uplift, which makes it difficult to identify on seismic section. A series of techniques were used, such as pre-stack time migration (PSTM), palaeogeomorphologic reconstruction, high-frequency isochronal stratigraphic division, wireline log facies analysis, channel sandbodies tracking with line drawings of seismic section, strata-bound wave impedance inversion and seismic amplitude strata slices etc. The result shows that the vertical resolution and spatial resolu-tion of seismic data are improved by reducing the grid bin from 15 m×30 m to 7.5 m×7.5 m in PSTM processing. Ng2 is characterized by the obvious "dual structure" of meandering channel, which display the thin interbedded layers of sandstone and mudstone. The sand bodies is controlled by short-term sedimentary cycle, and develop in the lower-middle part of short-term base-level rising hemi-cycles and upper part of short-term base-level descen-ding hemi-cycle. An analysis of seismic facies in Ng2 Ⅴ sand unit reveals that amplitude or wave impedance anomalies with channel forms, irregular arc shape show NE-SW and near NS distributed geomorphologic systems, indicating channel and point-bar complex depositions of meandering river system. The results manifest that the predicted results are consistent well with the actual drilling, and the channel distribution laws are in accordance with regional geological laws, demonstrating that seismic identification for thin channel sand body are true and reliable.

Key words: narrow and thin channel sandbodies, PSTM of seismic data processing with small grid bin, seismic facies analysis, Guantao Formation, Matouying Uplift

中图分类号: 

  • P631.4
[1] HUBBARD S M, SMITH D G, NIELSEN H, et al. Seismic geomorphology and sedimentology of a tidally influenced river deposit, Lower Cretaceous Athabasca oil sands, Alberta, Canada. AAPG Bulletin, 2011, 95(7):1123-1145.
[2] 孙雨, 董毅明, 王继平, 等.松辽盆地红岗北地区扶余油层储层单砂体分布模式. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):9-15. SUN Y, DONG Y M, WANG J P, et al. Distribution patterns of single sand body in Fuyu oil layer in the northern Honggang area, Songliao Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):9-15.
[3] 姜华, 汪泽成, 王华, 等.地震沉积学在塔北哈拉哈塘地区古河道识别中的应用.中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 42(12):3804-3810. JIANG H, WANG Z C, WANG H, et al. Recognizing palaechannels in Halahatang area, North Tarim by seismic sedimentology. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2011, 42(12):3804-3810.
[4] 张涛, 林承焰, 张宪国, 等.开发尺度的曲流河储层内部结构地震沉积学解释方法.地学前缘, 2012, 19(2):74-80. ZHANG T, LIN C Y, ZHANG X G, et al. Method for seismic sedimentology interpretation of reservoir architectures on development scale in meandering river. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(2):74-80.
[5] 郝兰英, 郭亚杰, 李杰, 等.地震沉积学在大庆长垣密井网条件下储层精细描述中的初步应用. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(2):81-86. HAO L Y, GUO Y J, LI J, et al. Preliminary application of the seismic sedimentology to reservoir refined description under the condition of high density well-pattern in Daqing Placanticline. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(2):81-86.
[6] 史忠生, 王天琦, 王建功, 等.地震沉积学在不同地质条件下砂体识别中的应用——以松辽盆地西斜坡和长垣地区为例. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(3):5-10. SHI Z S, WANG T Q, WANG J G, et al. Application of seismic sedimentology to sand body identification under different geological settings:a case study from the western slope and placanticline of Songliao Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(3):5-10.
[7] 魏立花, 杨占龙, 韩小锋, 等.薄砂体-窄河道地震识别技术研究及其在吐哈盆地SN地区应用.天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(12):2025-2033. WEI L H, YANG Z L, HAN X F, et al. Research and application of thin sand body-narrow channel seismic identification technology in the SN area. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(12):2025-2033.
[8] 蔡东梅, 郝兰英, 郭亚杰, 等.地震沉积学在水下分流河道砂体预测中的应用.中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 47(3):850-856. CAI D M, HAO L Y, GUO Y J, et al. Application of seismic sedimentology to predicting underwater distributary channel sandbody. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2016, 47(3):850-856.
[9] 朱茂, 朱筱敏, 曾洪流, 等.冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷浅水曲流河三角洲沉积体系——以赵皇庄-肃宁地区沙一段为例.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2):59-67. ZHU M, ZHU X M, ZENG H L, et al. Depositional system of shallow-water meandering river delta:a case from the first member of Shahejie Formation in Zhaohuangzhuang-Suning area of Raoyang Sag, Jizhong Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(2):59-67.
[10] 孙永河, 赵博, 董月霞, 等.南堡凹陷断裂对油气运聚成藏的控制作用. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(4):540-549. SUN Y H, ZHAO B, DONG Y X, et al. Control of faults on hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in the Nanpu Sag. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(4):540-549.
[11] 刘君荣, 王晓文, 赵忠新, 等.南堡凹陷拾场次洼的构造-沉积特征及其对岩性油藏勘探的影响.石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(5):601-608. LIU J R, WANG X W, ZHAO Z X,et al. Tectonic-sedimentary characteristics and their influences on the forming of lithologic hydrocarbon reservoirs in the Shichang Subsag of the Nanpu Sag. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(5):601-608.
[12] 张建坤, 杨国涛, 吴吉忠, 等.黄骅坳陷北部马头营凸起馆陶组砂体成因及展布特征.吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1):48-60. ZHANG J K, YANG G T, WU J Z, et al. Genesis and distribution characteristics of sandstone bodies in the Guantao Formation of Matouying uplift,the northern Huanghua Depression. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(1):48-60.
[13] 卢福珍.地震资料面元小网格化叠前偏移.大庆石油地质与开发, 2009, 28(3):130-133. LU F Z. Pre-stack time migration(pstm)of seismic data with small grid bin. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2009, 28(3):130-133.
[14] 邓宏文, 王红亮, 宁宁.沉积物体积分配原理——高分辨率层序地层学的理论基础.地学前缘, 2000, 7(4):305-313. DENG H W, WANG H L, NING N. Sediment volume partition principle:theory basis for high-resolution sequence stratigraphy. Earth Science Frontiers, 2000, 7(4):305-313.
[15] 柳妮, 文华国, 于景维, 等.准噶尔阜康东部斜坡区中侏罗统头屯河组高分辨层序地层格架内储集层宏观非均质性研究. 地质论评, 2014, 60(5):1158-1166. LIU N, WEN H G, YU J W, et al. Analysis of macroscopic heterogeneity within high resolution sequence stratigraphic framework in Toutunhe Formation of middle Jurassic in east of Fukang slope zone, Junggar Basin. Geological Review, 2014, 60(5):1158-1166.
[16] 崔连可, 单敬福, 李浮萍, 等.基于稀疏井网条件下的古辫状河道心滩砂体估算——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1):155-164. CUI L K, SHAN J F, LI F P, et al. Estimating method of braided channel bar under sparse well net:a case from Su X block in Sulige Gas Field. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1):155-164.
[17] 王玥, 郭彦如, 张延玲, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东北部山西组层序格架下的砂体成因类型、构型及分布. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3):80-91. WANG Y, GUO Y R, ZHANG Y L, et al. Genetic types, configurations and distribution of sand bodies of Shanxi Formation in northeastern Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(3):80-91.
[18] 李劲松, 郑晓东, 高志勇, 等.高分辨率层序地层学在提高储集层预测精度中的应用.石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(4):448-455. LI J S, ZHENG X D, GAO Z Y, et al. Application of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy in improving the precision of reservoir prediction. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009, 36(4):448-455.
[19] 王兆峰, 魏小东, 陈鑫, 等.基于小层约束地震反演技术在T油田的应用.石油地球物理勘探, 2012, 47(4):637-641. WANG Z F, WEI X D, CHEN X, et al. Application of thin-layer constrained seismic inversion technique in T Oilfield. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2012, 47(4):637-641.
[20] 陈美伊, 秦月霜, 王建民, 等.基于等时相控反演的致密砂岩储层地震识别方法.石油地球物理勘探, 2016, 51(4):782-791. CHEN M Y, QIN Y S, WANG J M, et al. Tight sandstone reservoir identification based on isochronal phase-controlled inversion. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2016, 51(4):782-791.
[1] 王航, 杨海风, 黄振, 白冰, 高雁飞. 基于可容纳空间变化的河流相演化新模式及其控藏作用——以莱州湾凹陷垦利A构造为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 73-83.
[2] 刘丽. 埕岛油田馆陶组曲流河砂体叠置模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 40-48.
[3] 李晨, 樊太亮, 高志前, 钱小会, 傅巍. 冲积扇高分辨率层序地层分析——以辽河坳陷曙一区杜84块SAGD开发区馆陶组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 66-75.
[4] 张京思,揣媛媛,边立恩. 正演模拟技术在渤海油田 X 井区砂体连通性研究中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3): 127-132.
[5] 徐中波,康 凯,申春生,何 滨,林国松,李 林. 渤海海域 L 油田新近系明化镇组下段与馆陶组储层沉积微相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 161-166.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏钦廉, 郑荣才, 肖玲, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴旗地区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[2] 王东琪, 殷代印. 水驱油藏相对渗透率曲线经验公式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 159 -164 .
[3] 李云,时志强. 四川盆地中部须家河组致密砂岩储层流体包裹体研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 27 -32 .
[4] 蒋韧,樊太亮,徐守礼. 地震地貌学概念与分析技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 33 -38 .
[5] 邹明亮,黄思静,胡作维,冯文立,刘昊年. 西湖凹陷平湖组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物形成机制及其对储层质量的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 47 -52 .
[6] 王冰洁,何生,倪军娥,方度. 板桥凹陷钱圈地区主干断裂活动性分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 75 -82 .
[7] 陈振标,张超谟,张占松,令狐松,孙宝佃. 利用NMRT2谱分布研究储层岩石孔隙分形结构[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 105 -110 .
[8] 张厚福,徐兆辉. 从油气藏研究的历史论地层-岩性油气藏勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 114 -123 .
[9] 张 霞. 勘探创造力的培养[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 16 -20 .
[10] 杨午阳, 杨文采, 刘全新, 王西文. 三维F-X域粘弹性波动方程保幅偏移方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 86 -91 .