岩性油气藏 ›› 2015, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 161–166.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2015.05.026

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

渤海海域 L 油田新近系明化镇组下段与馆陶组储层沉积微相研究

徐中波,康 凯,申春生,何 滨,林国松,李 林   

  1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司,天津 300452
  • 出版日期:2015-09-26 发布日期:2015-09-26
  • 作者简介:徐中波( 1984- ),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事油田开发地质方面的研究工作。 地址:( 300452 )天津市塘沽区闸北路 1 号渤海石油研究院 609 信箱蓬莱开发室。 电话:( 022 ) 25809474 。 E-mail : xuzhb2@cnooc.com.cn 。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重大科技专项课题“渤海海域大中型油气田地质特征”(编号: 2011ZX05023-006-002) 资助

Sedimentary microfacies of Neogene Guantao Formation and lower Minghuazhen Formation in L oilfield, Bohai Bay

Xu Zhongbo, Kang Kai, Shen Chunsheng, He Bin, Lin Guosong, Li Lin   

  1.  Tianjin Branch of CNOOC Ltd. , Tianjin 300452 , China
  • Online:2015-09-26 Published:2015-09-26

摘要:

根据渤海海域 L 油田 3 口取心井的岩心观察,结合室内实验测试数据和地球物理资料的综合分析,对 L 油田新近系明化镇组下段及馆陶组储层的岩石学和沉积学特征进行了综合研究。 L 油田新近系明化镇组下段与馆陶组储层以长石砂岩为主,明化镇组下段储层砂岩分选中等,磨圆度以次棱角—次圆状为主,而馆陶组储层砂岩的分选较差,磨圆度以次棱角状为主。储层砂岩发育低角度交错层理、槽状交错层理、冲刷面以及植物根茎等河流相沉积构造特征,同时,泥岩以杂色为主,也反映了一种浅水弱氧化-弱还原环境和氧化环境。 综合粒度概率累积曲线、C-M 图与测井曲线图,认为明化镇组下段主要为曲流河沉积,发育边滩、曲流河道、废弃河道、决口扇和泛滥平原沉积微相;馆陶组主要为辫状河沉积,发育心滩、辫状河道、河道边和河道间沉积微相。

关键词: 储层岩石, 应力敏感, 应力敏感指数, 实验, 岩心分析

Abstract:

The reservoir petrology and sedimentology of lower Minghuazhen Formation(N1m) and Guantao Formation (N1g) were comprehensively studied by detailed core observation, lab experiment data and geophysical data of 3 coring wells in L oilfield in Bohai Bay. The reservoirs are mainly composed of feldspar sandstone. The sandstone of lower N1m is mainly of medium sorting and subangular-subround roundness, while the sandstone of N1g is mainly of poor sorting and subangular roundness. The sandstone developed various sedimentary structures that can reflect river deposition, including low angle cross bedding, trough cross bedding, erosional surfaces and plant roots. Meanwhile, the variegated mudstone deposited also reflects a kind of shallow weak oxidation-reduction and oxidation environment. Accorded to grain size probability cumulative curves, C-M plot and logging characteristics, the lower N1m mainly developed meandering river deposits that can be divided into point bar, channel, abandoned channel, crevasse splay and floodplain microfacies; whereas, the N1g developed braided river deposits that can be divided into channel bar, braided channel, channel margin and interchannel microfacies.

Key words:  reservoir rocks, stress sensibility , stress-sensibilityindex , experiment , core analysis

[ 1 ] 徐怀大 . 渤海湾盆地下第三纪地层和沉积特征[ J ] . 海洋地质研究, 1981 , 1 ( 2 ): 10-27.

Xu Huaida. Stratigraphy and sedimentary features of Paleogene sediments of Bohai Bay basin [ J ] .Marine Geological Reserch , 1981 ,1 ( 2 ): 10-27.

[ 2 ] 王玉满,袁选俊,黄祖熹,等 . 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷新近系馆陶组沉积特征[ J ] . 古地理学报, 2003 , 5 ( 4 ): 404-413.

WangYuman , YuanXuanjun , HuangZuxi , etal. Sedimentary characteristics of the Guantao formation of Neogene in Nanpu sag of Bohai Bay basin [ J ] . Journal of Palaeogeography , 2003 , 5 ( 4 ): 404-413.

[ 3 ] 王治国,尹成,蒋志斌,等 . 莱州湾凹陷明化镇组下段河道储层的地震地貌分析[ J ] . 石油地球物理勘探, 2012 , 47 ( 4 ): 629-636.

Wang Zhiguo , Yin Cheng , Jiang Zhibin , et al. Seismic geomorphology of channel reservoir in lower Minghuazhen formation , Laizhouwan Depression [ J ] . Oil Geophysical Prospecting , 2012 , 47 ( 4 ): 629-636.

[ 4 ] 张建国,姜在兴,鲜本忠,等 . 南堡凹陷新近系明化镇组湖泊—三角洲沉积的发现[ J ] . 东北石油大学学报, 2013 , 37 ( 6 ): 18-24.

Zhang Jianguo , Jiang Zaixing , Xian Benzhong , et al. The discovery and significance of lacustrine environment-delta in Minghuazhen Formation , NanpuSag [ J ] .Journal of Northeast Petroleum University ,2013 , 37 ( 6 ): 18-24.

[ 5 ] 于兴河 . 碎屑岩系油气储层沉积学(第二版)[ M ] . 北京:石油工业出版社, 2008 : 115-130.

Yu Xinghe. Clastic reservoir sedimentology [ M ] . 2nd Edition. Beijing :PetroleumIndustry  Press , 2008 : 115-130.

[ 6 ] 刘立,胡春燕 . 砂岩中主要碎屑成分的物源区意义[ J ] . 岩相古地理, 1991 ( 6 ): 48-53.

Liu Li , Hu Chunyan. The significance of the main sandstone clastic components to the source area [ J ] . Sedimentary facies and Palaeogeography , 1991 ( 6 ): 48-53.

[ 7 ] 宫博识,文华国,李丛林,等 . 准噶尔盆地乌尔禾地区风城组沉积环境分析[ J ] . 岩性油气藏, 2014 , 26 ( 6 ): 59-66.

Gong Boshi , Wen Huaguo , Li Conglin , et al. Sedimentary environment of Fengcheng Formation in Urho area , Junggar Basin [ J ] . Lithologic Reservoirs , 2014 , 26 ( 6 ): 59-66.

[ 8 ] MaillAD.Architecture-elementanalysis : Anewmethodoffaciesanalysis applied to fluvial deposits [ J ] . Earth Sciences Reviews , 1985 , 22 :261-308.

[ 9 ] 蔡东梅 . 松辽盆地扶余油田泉四段沉积微相研究[ J ] . 岩性油气藏, 2014 , 26 ( 5 ): 57-63.

Cai Dongmei. Sedimentary microfacies of the fourth member of Quantou Formation in Fuyu Oilfield , southern Songliao Basin [ J ] .Lithologic Reservoirs , 2014 , 26 ( 5 ): 57-63.

[ 10 ] 白振华,詹燕涛,王赢,等 . 苏里格气田苏 14 井区盒 8 段河流相砂体展布与演化规律研究[ J ] . 岩性油气藏, 2013 , 25 ( 1 ): 56-62.

Bai Zhenhua , Zhan Yantao , Wang Ying , et al. Fluvial sand bodies distribution and evolution of He 8 member in Su 14 block of Sulige Gas Field [ J ] . Lithologic Reservoirs , 2013 , 25 ( 1 ): 56-62.

[ 11 ] 李宣玥,尹太举,柯兰梅,等 . 渤海湾盆地黄河口凹陷明化镇组下段物源分析[ J ] . 石油天然气学报, 2012 , 34 ( 2 ): 36-40.

Li Xuanyue , Yin Taiju , Ke Lanmei , et al. Provenance analysis of the lower member of Minghuazhen Formation in Huanghekou Sag of Bohaiwan Basin [ J ] . Journal of Oil and Gas Technology , 2012 ,34 ( 2 ): 36-40.

[ 12 ] 刘士林,刘蕴华,林舸,等 . 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷新近系泥岩稀土元素地球化学特征及其地质意义[ J ] . 现代地质, 2006 , 20( 3 ): 449-456.

Liu Shilin , Liu Yunhua , Lin Ge , et al. REE geochemical characteristics and geological significance of mudstones from Neogene ,Nanpu Sag , Bohai Basin [ J ] . Geoscience , 2006 , 20 ( 3 ): 449-456.

[ 13 ] 李东海,姜在兴,李继山 . 济阳坳陷东部新近系馆陶组下段辫状河三角洲沉积研究[ J ] . 石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2003 ,27 ( 3 ): 10-13.

Li Donghai , Jiang Zaixing , Li Jishan. Braided river delta sedimentary facies of lower Guantao formation of Neogene in easten Jiyang depression [ J ] . Journal of the University of Petroleum , China : Edition of Natural Science , 2003 , 27 ( 3 ): 10-13.

[1] 杜旭林, 戴宗, 辛晶, 李海龙, 曹仁义, 罗东红. 强底水稠油油藏水平井三维水驱物理模拟实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 141-148.
[2] 关华, 郭平, 赵春兰, 谭保国, 徐冬梅. 渤海湾盆地永安油田永66区块氮气驱油机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 149-160.
[3] 姜瑞忠, 张福蕾, 崔永正, 潘红, 张旭, 张春光, 沈泽阳. 考虑应力敏感和复杂运移的页岩气藏压力动态分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 149-156.
[4] 姬靖皓, 席家辉, 曾凤凰, 杨啟桂. 致密油藏分段多簇压裂水平井非稳态产能模型[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 157-164.
[5] 李沛, 张金川, 唐玄, 霍志鹏, 李振, 刘君兰, 李中明. 南华北盆地中牟—温县区块上古生界页岩气吸附特性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 66-75.
[6] 姜瑞忠, 沈泽阳, 崔永正, 张福蕾, 张春光, 原建伟. 双重介质低渗油藏斜井压力动态特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 131-137.
[7] 余川, 周洵, 方光建, 汪生秀, 余忠樯. 地层温压条件下页岩吸附性能变化特征——以渝东北地区龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 10-17.
[8] 李翔, 王建功, 张平, 李琳, 黄成刚, 伍坤宇, 张庆辉, 龙伟. 柴达木盆地英西地区E32裂缝成因与油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 45-54.
[9] 张洪, 孟选刚, 邵长金, 代晓旭, 余浩, 李相方. 水平压裂裂缝形成机理及监测——以七里村油田为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 138-145.
[10] 景紫岩, 张佳, 李国斌, 竺彪, 韩国庆, 刘双双. 泡沫混排携砂解堵机理及影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 154-160.
[11] 马力, 欧阳传湘, 谭钲扬, 王长权, 宋岩, 林飞. 低渗透油藏CO2驱中后期提效方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 139-145.
[12] 刘智颖, 章成广, 唐军, 肖承文. 裂缝对岩石电阻率的影响及其在含气饱和度计算中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 120-128.
[13] 刘振峰. 油气地震地质模型述评[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 19-29.
[14] 李友全, 韩秀虹, 阎燕, 张德志, 周志为, 孟凡坤. 低渗透油藏CO2吞吐压力响应曲线分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6): 119-127.
[15] 张杰, 张超谟, 张占松, 张冲, 聂昕. 基于应力-应变曲线形态的致密气储层脆性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 126-131.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟,高振中,王正允,王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广,刘博,吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良,曾溅辉,张善文,王永诗,王洪玉,刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷 明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .