地层温压条件下页岩吸附性能变化特征——以渝东北地区龙马溪组为例

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20180602

岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 10–17.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180602

地层温压条件下页岩吸附性能变化特征——以渝东北地区龙马溪组为例

余川^1,2, 周洵^1,2, 方光建^1,2, 汪生秀^1,2, 余忠樯^1,2

1. 油气资源与探测国家重点实验室重庆页岩气研究中心, 重庆 400042;
2. 重庆地质矿产研究院页岩气勘探开发国家地方联合工程研究中心, 重庆 400042

收稿日期:2018-03-20 修回日期:2018-05-16 出版日期:2018-11-16 发布日期:2018-11-16
第一作者:余川(1985-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事页岩气地质勘探方面的研究工作。地址:(400042)重庆市渝中区长江二路177-9号重庆地质矿产研究院。Email:280850336@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划“973”项目“渝东南地区下古生界页岩气资源潜力评价”（编号：2012CB214705-05）与重庆市国土房管局科技计划项目“基于构造与热演化时空配置关系的页岩气有利保存区评价——以重庆及周缘下寒武统为例”（编号：KJ-2018028）联合资助

Adsorptivity of shale under the formation temperature and pressure: a case of Longmaxi Formation in northeastern Chongqing

YU Chuan^1,2, ZHOU Xun^1,2, FANG Guangjian^1,2, WANG Shengxiu^1,2, YU Zhongqiang^1,2

1. Chongqing Shale Gas Research Center of State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, Chongqing 400042, China;
2. National Joint Engineering Research Center for Shale Gas Exploration and Development, Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chongqing 400042, China

Received:2018-03-20 Revised:2018-05-16 Online:2018-11-16 Published:2018-11-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 页岩气储层的吸附性是影响页岩含气性的关键因素。以渝东北地区下志留统龙马溪组富有机质页岩为例，通过变等温吸附实验，模拟在地层温压变化条件下页岩吸附性能的变化规律，为该区页岩气勘探提供理论依据。实验分析表明：有机质是控制龙马溪组页岩吸附性能的主要内在因素，有机碳含量与页岩吸附能力具有很好的正相关性；地层温压条件是控制页岩吸附性能的外在因素，温度和压力对于页岩吸附性能具有相互抑制的作用，随着温度和压力的升高，页岩吸附能力呈现出类似“抛物线”（先增大后减小）的变化轨迹，在温度和压力均相对较低时，压力起主导作用，在温度和压力均相对较高时，温度起主导作用。页岩吸附性能若要达到最佳状态，则需要埋深、温度和压力三者达到一种合适的匹配状态。实验模拟结果显示，渝东北地区龙马溪组页岩最佳理论吸附状态应在1 000～4 500 m的埋深条件下。

关键词: 吸附性能, 温压条件, 变等温吸附实验, 龙马溪组, 渝东北地区

Abstract: Adsorptivity is a typical characteristic of shale gas reservoir and a key impact factor of shale gas content. The change rule of shale adsorptivity under the formation temperature and pressure was simulated by a heterothermal adsorption experiment with a case of Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale in northeastern Chongqing, so as to provide theoretical basis for shale gas exploration in this area. The result shows that organic matter is the main internal factor which impacts shale adsorptivity of Longmaxi Formation and the TOC content has a very positive correlation with the adsorption capacity of shale. The geological conditions of temperature and pressure are the external factors which impact shale adsorptivity. Temperature and pressure are mutual inhibitory for shale adsorptivity. With the increase of temperature and pressure, the variation tendency of shale adsorption capacity is similar to parabola. When temperature and pressure are relatively low, pressure plays a leading role, while temperature plays a leading role when temperature and pressure are relatively high. Under the underground condition, the best adsorption state of shale needs to achieve an appropriate matching of temperature, pressure and burial depth). The experimental simulation results show that the optimum theoretical adsorption state of Longmaxi shale in northeastern Chongqing should be at the depth of 1 000-4 500 m.

Key words: adsorptivity, temperature-pressure conditions, heterothermal adsorption experiment, Longmaxi Formation, northeastern Chongqing

中图分类号:

P618.13

余川, 周洵, 方光建, 汪生秀, 余忠樯. 地层温压条件下页岩吸附性能变化特征——以渝东北地区龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 10–17.

YU Chuan, ZHOU Xun, FANG Guangjian, WANG Shengxiu, YU Zhongqiang. Adsorptivity of shale under the formation temperature and pressure: a case of Longmaxi Formation in northeastern Chongqing[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(6): 10–17.

参考文献

[1] LU X C, LI F C, WATSON A T. Adsorption measurement in Devonian shales. Fuel, 1995, 74(4):599-603.
[2] 李武广, 杨胜来, 徐晶, 等.考虑地层温度和压力的页岩吸附气含量计算新模型.天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(4):791-796. LI W G, YANG S L, XU J, et al. A new model for shale adsorptive gas amount under a certain geological condition of temperature and pressure. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(4):791-796.
[3] 林腊梅, 张金川, 韩双彪, 等.泥页岩储层等温吸附测试异常探讨. 油气地质与采收率, 2012, 19(6):30-32. LIN L M, ZHANG J C, HAN S B, et al. Study on abnormal curves of isothermal adsorption of shale. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2012, 19(6):30-32.
[4] 聂海宽, 张金川, 马晓彬, 等.页岩等温吸附气含量负吸附现象初探. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(6):282-288. NIE H K, ZHANG J C, MA X B, et al. A preliminary study of negative adsorption phenomena of shale adsorption gas content by isothermal adsorption. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(6):282-288.
[5] 刘洪林, 王红岩.中国南方海相页岩吸附特征及其影响因素. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(9):5-9. LIU H L, WANG H Y. Adsorptivity and influential factors of marine shales in South China. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(9):5-9.
[6] 郭为, 熊伟, 高树生, 等. 温度对页岩等温吸附/解吸特征影响. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(4):481-485. GUO W, XIONG W, GAO S S, et al. Impact of temperature on the isothermal adsorption/desorption characteristics of shale gas. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(4):481-485.
[7] 赵金, 张遂安, 曹立虎.页岩气与煤层气吸附特征对比实验研究.天然气地球科学, 2013,24(1):176-181. ZHAO J, ZHANG S A, CAO L H. Comparison of experimental adsorption between shale gas and coalbed gas. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(1):176-181.
[8] 张林, 魏国齐, 李熙喆, 等.四川盆地震旦系一下古生界高过成熟烃源岩演化史分析.天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(5):726-731. ZHANG L, WEI G Q, LI X Z, et al. The thermal history of SinianLower Paleozoic high/over mature source rock in Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2007, 18(5):726-731.
[9] 聂海宽, 包书景, 高波, 等.四川盆地及其周缘下古生界页岩气保存条件研究. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(3):280-294. NIE H K, BAO S J, GAO B, et al. A study of shale gas preservation conditions for the Lower Paleozoic in Sichuan Basin and its periphery. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(3):280-294.
[10] 张英, 单秀琴, 肖芝华, 等.五科1井下古生界流体包裹体特征与天然气成藏期分析. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2006, 25(1):60-65. ZHANG Y, SHAN X Q, XIAO Z H, et al. The characteristics of fluid inclusions in Lower Paleozoic system of the well Wuke 1 and the analysis of the reservoir-forming stage. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2006, 25(1):60-65.
[11] 曾道富, 曾学思.四川盆地古地温及古地温梯度研究. 天然气工业, 1987, 7(4):12-16. ZENG D F, ZENG X S. A research on paleo-geotherm and paleogeothermal gradient of Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 1987, 7(4):12-16.
[12] 王艳飞, 肖贤明.四川盆地东北地区古地温梯度模拟. 海相油气地质, 2010, 15(4):57-61. WANG Y F, XIAO X M. An investigation of paleogeothermal gradients in the northeastern part of Sichuan Basin. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2010, 15(4):57-61.
[13] 邹才能, 朱如凯, 白斌, 等.中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值.岩石学报, 2011, 27(6):1857-1864. ZOU C N, ZHU R K, BAI B, et al. First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(6):1857-1864.
[14] 陈铭, 胥云, 翁定为.页岩气藏游离气量和解吸气量计算方法研究.科学技术与工程, 2015, 15(29):33-38. CHEN M, XU Y, WENG D W. Study on the calculation method of volume of free and desorbed gases in shale gas reservoirs. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15(29):33-38.
[15] 朱汉卿, 贾爱林, 位云生, 等.基于氩气吸附的页岩纳米级孔隙结构特征. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2):77-84. ZHU H Q, JIA A L, WEI Y S, et al. Nanopore structure characteristics of shale based on Ar adsorption. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(2):77-84.
[16] 韩双彪, 张金川, HORSFIELD B, 等.页岩气储层孔隙类型及特征研究:以渝东南下古生界为例.地学前缘, 2013, 20(3):247-253. HAN S B, ZHANG J C, HORSFIELD B, et al. Pore types and characteristics of shale gas reservoir:a case study of Lower Paleozoic shale in southeast Chongqing. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(3):247-253.
[17] 尹帅, 谢润成, 丁文龙, 等.常规及非常规储层岩石分形特征对渗透率的影响.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4):81-90. YIN S, XIE R C, DING W L, et al. Influences of fractal characteristics of reservoir rocks on permeability. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4):81-90.
[18] 余川, 聂海宽, 曾春林, 等. 四川盆地东部下古生界页岩储集空间特征及其对含气性的影响.地质学报, 2014, 88(7):1311-1320. YU C, NIE H K, ZENG C L, et al. Shale reservoir space characteristics and the effect on gas content in Lower Paleozoic Erathem of the eastern Sichuan Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2014, 88(7):1311-1320.
[19] 曹涛涛, 邓模, 刘虎, 等.可溶有机质对泥页岩储集物性的影响.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3):43-51. CAO T T, DENG M, LIU H, et al. Influences of soluble organic matter on reservoir properties of shale. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(3):43-51.
[20] 郭秀梅, 王剑, 杨宇宁, 等. 渝东北地区五峰组-龙马溪组黑色页岩储层特征. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2015, 35(2):54-59. GUO X M, WANG J, YANG Y N, et al. Black shale reservoirs from the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations in northeastern Chongqing. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2015, 35(2):54-59.
[21] 郭旭升.涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块富集机理与勘探技术.北京:科学出版社, 2014:104-109. GUO X S. Shale gas enrichment mechanism and exploration technology in Fuling Jiaoshiba blocks. Beijing:Science Press, 2014:104-109.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

地层温压条件下页岩吸附性能变化特征——以渝东北地区龙马溪组为例

Adsorptivity of shale under the formation temperature and pressure: a case of Longmaxi Formation in northeastern Chongqing

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[2]	邱玉超, 李亚丁, 文龙, 罗冰, 姚军, 许强, 文华国, 谭秀成. 川东地区寒武系洗象池组构造特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 122-132.
[3]	程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[4]	计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[5]	包汉勇, 刘超, 甘玉青, 薛萌, 刘世强, 曾联波, 马诗杰, 罗良. 四川盆地涪陵南地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩古构造应力场及裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 14-22.
[6]	闫建平, 罗静超, 石学文, 钟光海, 郑马嘉, 黄毅, 唐洪明, 胡钦红. 川南泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育模式及意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 60-71.
[7]	邱晨, 闫建平, 钟光海, 李志鹏, 范存辉, 张悦, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 四川盆地泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩沉积微相划分及测井识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 117-130.
[8]	张梦琳, 李郭琴, 何嘉, 衡德. 川西南缘天宫堂构造奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 141-151.
[9]	王登, 周豹, 冷双梁, 温雅茹, 刘海, 张小波, 余江浩, 陈威. 鄂西咸丰地区五峰组—龙马溪组硅质岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 52-62.
[10]	王涛, 张生银, 魏璞, 李俊飞, 郭晖, 张顺存. 沸石类矿物成因及其对储层储集性能的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 175-186.
[11]	杨占伟, 姜振学, 梁志凯, 吴伟, 王军霞, 宫厚健, 李维邦, 苏展飞, 郝绵柱. 基于2种机器学习方法的页岩TOC含量评价——以川南五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 130-138.
[12]	李小佳, 邓宾, 刘树根, 吴娟, 周政, 焦堃. 川南宁西地区五峰组—龙马溪组多期流体活动[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 135-144.
[13]	张兵, 唐书恒, 郗兆栋, 蔺东林, 叶亚培. 湘西北地区五峰组—龙马溪组生物地层特征及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 11-21.
[14]	尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一₁亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
[15]	杨洋, 石万忠, 张晓明, 王任, 徐笑丰, 刘俞佐, 白卢恒, 曹沈厅, 冯芊. 页岩岩相的测井曲线识别方法——以焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 135-146.