岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 93–101.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210610

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

南堡凹陷二号断裂带古生界碳酸盐岩潜山岩溶模式

田晓平, 张汶, 周连德, 沈孝秀, 郭维   

  1. 中海石油 (中国) 有限公司天津分公司, 天津 300459
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-05 修回日期:2021-04-30 出版日期:2021-12-01 发布日期:2021-11-25
  • 第一作者:田晓平(1969-),女,高级工程师,主要从事石油地质方面的研究工作。地址:(300459)天津市滨海新区海川路2121号。Email:tianxp@cnooc.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家科技重大专项“渤海油田高效开发示范工程”（编号：2016ZX05058）资助

Karst model of Paleozoic carbonate buried hill in No. 2 fault zone of Nanpu Sag

TIAN Xiaoping, ZHANG Wen, ZHOU Liande, SHEN Xiaoxiu, GUO Wei   

  1. Tianjin Branch of CNOOC Limited, Tianjin 300459, China
  • Received:2021-03-05 Revised:2021-04-30 Online:2021-12-01 Published:2021-11-25

PDF (PC)

243

摘要： 南堡凹陷古生界潜山为渤海海域重要的油气勘探和评价目标。为研究该构造二号断裂带古生界碳酸盐岩潜山岩溶模式，通过岩心观察、薄片鉴定、测井分析、构造演化、岩溶演化模式等研究，结合古地貌特征对各区块岩溶模式差异性进行了综合分析。结果表明：①岩溶储层岩性为灰岩和白云岩，具有双重孔隙介质特征，其基质孔隙连通性较差，裂缝在储集空间中起到关键作用。一方面可对微观孔隙进行沟通疏导，另一方面沿裂缝发育的溶蚀孔洞为重要的储集空间。②潜山岩溶储层主要经历了表生期岩溶作用和埋藏期胶结作用，其中表生期岩溶受印支—燕山早期逆冲褶皱作用影响，形成了现今构造格局和断裂系统，控制了岩溶储层的发育和分布，但燕山中晚期—喜山期的埋藏胶结为岩溶储层形成过程中的破坏作用，主要表现为地表水和地层水对早先形成的缝洞储集空间进行充填。③岩溶作用强度受古地貌和断裂控制。根据古地貌形态及岩溶作用强度划出岩溶高地、岩溶斜坡区和岩溶洼地，各区块间及同区块内岩溶储层发育程度差异主要是离断层远近、古地貌位置高低和斜坡陡缓的原因造成的。其中靠近断裂的古地貌斜坡缓坡带岩溶作用最强，保存条件最好，岩溶储层最为发育，为油气勘探的有利目标。该研究成果对碳酸盐岩潜山的油气勘探具有指导意义。

关键词: 古地貌, 岩溶模式, 碳酸盐岩潜山, 古生界, 南堡凹陷

Abstract: The Paleozoic buried hill in Nanpu Sag is an important target for oil and gas exploration and evaluation in Bohai Sea. In order to study the karst model of Paleozoic carbonate buried hill in No.2 fault zone of Nanpu Sag, based on core observation, thin section identification, logging analysis, structural evolution, karst evolution model, combined with paleogeomorphology characteristics, the differences of karst models in each block were comprehensively analyzed. The results show that: (1) the lithology of karst reservoir is limestone and dolomite, with the characteristics of dual pore medium. The connectivity of matrix pores is poor, and fractures play a key role in the reservoir space. They can communicate and dredge the micropores and dissolved pores developed along the fractures are important reservoir spaces. (2) The buried hill karst reservoir mainly experienced supergene karstification and burial cementation. The supergene karstification was affected by the Indosinian-Early Yanshanian thrust folding, forming the current structural pattern and fault system, controlling the development and distribution of karst reservoir. On the other hand, the burial cementation in the Middle-Late Yanshanian-Himalayan period is mainly manifested as the filling of the fracture cavity reservoir space formed earlier by surface water and formation water, which is the destructive effect in the process of karst reservoir formation. The intensity of karstification is controlled by paleogeomorphology and faults. According to the paleogeomorphic morphology and karstification intensity, karst Highlands, karst slope areas and karst depressions are divided. The differences in the development degree of karst reservoirs between different blocks and within the same block are mainly caused by the distance to the fault, the position of paleogeomorphology and the steep and gentle slope. (3) The intensity of karstification is controlled by paleogeomorphology and faults. According to the morphology of paleogeomorphology and the intensity of karstification, karst highlands, karst slope areas and karst depressions are divided. The differences in the development degree of karst reservoirs among the blocks are mainly caused by the location of paleogeomorphology and the steep and gentle slope. The gentle slope zone of paleogeomorphology near the faults has the strongest karstification, the best preservation conditions and the most developed karst reservoir, which is a favorable target for oil and gas exploration in the study area. The research results can provide reference for oil and gas exploration in carbonate buried hill.

Key words: paleogeomorphology, karst model, carbonate buried hill, Paleozoic, Nanpu Sag

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] 李阳, 金强, 钟建华, 等. 塔河油田奥陶系岩溶分带及缝洞结构特征. 石油学报, 2016, 37(3):289-298. LI Y, JIN Q, ZHONG J H, et al. Karst zonings and fracture-cave structure characteristics of Ordovician reservoirs in Tahe Oilfield, Tarim Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(3):289-298.
[2] 乔桂林, 钱一雄, 曹自成, 等. 塔里木盆地玉北地区奥陶系鹰山组储层特征及岩溶模式.石油实验地质, 2014, 36(4):416-421. QIAO G L, QIAN Y X, CAO Z C, et al. Reservoir characteristics and karst model of Ordovician Yingshan Formation in Yubei area, Tarim Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2014, 36(4):416-421.
[3] 张亚, 陈双玲, 张晓丽, 等. 四川盆地茅口组岩溶古地貌刻画及油气勘探意义. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3):44-55. ZHANG Y, CHEN S L, ZHANG X L, et al. Restoration of paleokarst geomorphology of Lower Permian Maokou Formation and its petroleum exploration implication in Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3):44-55.
[4] 黄芸, 杨德相, 李玉帮, 等. 冀中坳陷杨税务奥陶系深潜山储层特征及主控因素. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2):70-80. HUANG Y, YANG D X, LI Y B, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Ordovician Yangshuiwu deep buried hill in Jizhong Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(2):70-80.
[5] 兰光志, 江同文, 张廷山, 等. 碳酸盐岩古岩溶储层模式及其特征. 天然气工业, 1996, 16(6):13-17. LAN G Z, JIANG T W, ZHANG T S, et al. Carbonate rock palaeokarst reservoir mode and its characteristics. Natural Gas Industry, 1996, 16(6):13-17.
[6] 王振宇, 李凌, 谭秀成, 等. 塔里木盆地奥陶系碳酸盐岩古岩溶类型识别. 西南石油大学学报, 2008, 30(5):11-16. WANG Z Y, LI L, TAN X C, et al. Types and recognizable indicators of Ordovician carbonate rock karstification in Tarim Basin. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University, 2008, 30(5):11-16.
[7] 王军杰, 王旭, 郑海亮, 等. 靖边气田下古储层岩溶作用差异性分析. 石油化工应用, 2012, 31(7):38-40. WANG J J, WANG X, ZHENG H L, et al. Difference analysis of karstification in lower paleo reservoir of Jingbian Gas Field. Petrochemical Industry Application, 2012, 31(7):38-40.
[8] 胡明义, 付晓树, 蔡全升, 等. 塔北哈拉哈塘地区奥陶系鹰山组-一间房组岩溶储层特征及成因模式. 中国地质, 2014, 41(5):1476-1486. HU M Y, FU X S, CAI Q S, et al. Characteristics and genetic model of karst reservoirs of Ordovician Yingshan-Yijianfang Formation in Halahatang area, northern Tarim Basin. Geology in China, 2014, 41(5):1476-1486.
[9] 李定龙, 贾疏源. 威远构造阳新灰岩岩溶隙洞系统发育演化特征. 石油与天然气地质, 1994, 15(2):151-157. LI D L, JIA S Y. Development and evolution of karst fissurecave system in Yangxin series, Weiyuan structure. Oil & Gas Geology, 1994, 15(2):151-157.
[10] 金振奎, 邹元龙, 蒋春雷, 等. 大港探区奥陶系岩溶储层发育分布控制因素. 沉积学报, 2001, 19(4):530-535. JIN Z K, ZOU Y L, JIANG C L, et al. Distribution and controlling factors of Ordovician karst reservoirs in Dagang region. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2001, 19(4):530-535.
[11] 张仲培, 刘仕林, 杨子玉, 等. 塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡构造演化及油气地质意义.石油与天然气地质, 2011, 32(6):909-918. ZHANG Z P, LIU S L, YANG Z Y, et al. Tectonic evolution and its petroleum geological significances of the Maigaiti slop, Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2011, 32(6):909-918.
[12] 李阳, 范智慧. 塔河奥陶系碳酸盐岩油藏缝洞系统发育模式与分布规律. 石油学报, 2011, 32(1):101-106. LI Y, FAN Z H. Developmental pattern and distribution rule of the fracture-cavity system of Ordovician carbonate reservoirs in the Tahe Oilfield. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(1):101-106.
[13] 侯方浩, 方少仙, 董兆雄, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中奥陶统马家沟组沉积环境与岩相发育特征.沉积学报, 2003, 21(1):106-112. HOU F H, FANG S X, DONG Z X, et al. The developmental characters of sedimentary environments and lithofacies of Middle Ordovician Majiagou Formation in Ordos Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2003, 21(1):106-112.
[14] 罗晓彤, 文华国, 彭才, 等. 巴西桑托斯盆地L油田BV组湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征及高精度层序划分. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3):68-81. LUO X T, WEN H G, PENG C, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and high-precision sequence division of lacustrine carbonate rocks of BV Formation in L oilfield of Santos Basin, Brazil. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3):68-81.
[15] 王起琮, 赵淑萍, 魏钦廉, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中奥陶统马家沟组海相碳酸盐岩储集层特征.古地理学报, 2012, 14(2):229-242. WANG Q C, ZHAO S P, WEI Q L, et al. Marine carbonate reservoir characteristics of the Middle Ordovician Majiagou Formation in Ordos Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2012, 14(2):229-242.
[16] 张家政, 陈松龄, 成永生, 等. 南堡凹陷周边凸起地区碳酸盐岩成岩作用与孔隙演化.石油天然气学报, 2008, 30(2):161-165. ZHANG J Z, CHEN S L, CHENG Y S, et al. Carbonate diagenesis and porosity evolution in adjacent arch of Nanpu Depression. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2008, 30(2):161-165.
[17] 张宝民, 刘静江. 中国岩溶储集层分类与特征及相关的理论问题. 石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(1):12-28. ZHANG B M, LIU J J. Classification and characteristics of karst reservoirs in China and related theories. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009, 36(1):12-28.
[18] 赵莉莉, 郑恒科, 万维, 等. 南堡凹陷古近纪古湖泊学研究. 特种油气藏, 2013, 20(5):57-61. ZHAO L L, ZHENG H K, WAN W, et al. Research on Paleogene paleolimnology in Nanpu Sag. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2013, 20(5):57-61.
[19] 达丽亚, 张新涛, 徐春强, 等. 渤海海域奥陶系碳酸盐岩岩溶储层特征及主控因素:以石臼坨凸起427构造带为例. 中国海上油气, 2019, 31(4):36-45. DA L Y, ZHANG X T, XU C Q, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of Ordovician karst reservoirs in Bohai sea:A case study of 427 tectonic belt in Shijiutuo uplift. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2019, 31(4):36-45.
[20] 汪泽成, 赵文智, 胡素云, 等. 我国海相碳酸盐岩大油气田油气藏类型及分布特征.石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(2):153-160. WANG Z C, ZHAO W Z, HU S Y, et al. Reservoir types and distribution characteristics of large marine carbonate oil and gas fields in China. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(2):153-160.
[21] 雷川, 陈红汉, 苏奥, 等. 方解石充填物对于深层古岩溶洞穴保存的独特意义:以塔河地区奥陶系为例. 沉积学报, 2016, 34(5):842-852. LEI C, CHEN H H, SU A, et al. Distinctive significance of calcite fillings for preservation of deep buried karst Paleocaves:Taking the Ordovician system in Tahe area for example. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(5):842-852.
[22] 陈丽祥, 牛成民, 李慧勇, 等. 渤海湾盆地渤中21-2构造碳酸盐岩储层发育特征及其控制因素. 油气地质与采收率, 2016, 23(2):16-21. CHEN L X, NIU C M, LI H Y, et al. Carbonate reservoir characteristics and its controlling factors in Bozhong 21-2 structure, Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Geology and Oil Recovery, 2016, 23(2):16-21.
[23] 赵春明, 张建民, 李祖兵.渤中28-1油田奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层特征及主控因素. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2017, 36(1):27-34. ZHAO C M, ZHANG J M, LI Z B. Characteristics and main controlling factors for the Ordovician carbonate reservoir in Bozhong 28-1 Oilfield. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2017, 36(1):27-34.
[24] 易定红, 王建功, 石兰亭, 等. 柴达木盆地英西地区E32碳酸盐岩沉积演化特征. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2):46-55. YI D H, WANG J G, SHI L T, et al. Sedimentary evolution characteristics of E 32 carbonate rocks in Yingxi area, Qaidam Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2):46-55.
[25] 肖林萍. 埋藏条件下碳酸盐岩实验室溶蚀作用模拟的热力学模型与地质勘探方向:以陕甘宁盆地下奥陶统马家沟组第五段为例. 岩相古地理, 1997, 17(4):57-70. XIAO L P. Thermodynamic model for experimental simulation of dissolution of the carbonate rocks in the burial environments:An example from the fifth member of the Lower Devonian Majiagou Formation in the Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia Basin. Lithofacies Palaeogeography, 1997, 17(4):57-70.
[1] 关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[2] 王同川, 陈浩如, 温龙彬, 钱玉贵, 李玉琢, 文华国. 川东五百梯地区石炭系岩溶古地貌识别及储集意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 109-121.
[3] 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[4] 牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
[5] 王天海, 许多年, 吴涛, 关新, 谢再波, 陶辉飞. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组沉积相展布特征及沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 98-110.
[6] 李毕松, 苏建龙, 蒲勇, 缪志伟, 张文军, 肖伟, 张雷, 江馀. 四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组相控岩溶刻画及预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 69-77.
[7] 张坦, 贾梦瑶, 孙雅雄, 丁文龙, 石司宇, 范昕禹, 姚威. 四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 111-120.
[8] 邓远, 陈轩, 覃建华, 李映艳, 何吉祥, 陶鑫, 尹太举, 高阳. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组一段沉积期古地貌特征及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 136-144.
[9] 罗贝维, 尹继全, 胡广成, 陈华, 康敬程, 肖萌, 朱秋影, 段海岗. 阿联酋西部地区白垩系森诺曼阶高孔渗灰岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 63-71.
[10] 何雁兵, 肖张波, 郑仰帝, 刘君毅, 易浩, 赵庆, 张月霞, 贺勇. 珠江口盆地陆丰13洼转换带中生界陆丰7-9潜山成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 18-28.
[11] 杨润泽, 赵贤正, 刘海涛, 李宏军, 赵长毅, 蒲秀刚. 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古生界源内和源下油气成藏特征及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 110-125.
[12] 文雯, 杨西燕, 向曼, 陶夏妍, 杨容, 李阳, 范家兴, 蒲柏宇. 四川盆地开江—梁平海槽东侧三叠系飞仙关组鲕滩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 68-79.
[13] 黄军立, 张伟, 刘力辉, 蔡国富, 曾有良, 孟庆友, 刘浩. 珠江口盆地番禺4洼古近系文昌组三元地震构形解释技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 103-112.
[14] 何春丰, 张翔, 田景春, 夏永涛, 杨燕茹, 陈杰, 王鑫宇. 塔北新和地区下白垩统舒善河组薄砂体沉积相特征及沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 120-131.
[15] 李凌, 张照坤, 李明隆, 倪佳, 耿超, 唐思哲, 杨文杰, 谭秀成. 四川盆地威远—高石梯地区二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 32-46.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄思静,黄培培,王庆东,刘昊年,吴　萌,邹明亮. 胶结作用在深埋藏砂岩孔隙保存中的意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 7 -13 .
[2] 刘震, 陈艳鹏, 赵阳,, 郝奇, 许晓明, 常迈. 陆相断陷盆地油气藏形成控制因素及分布规律概述[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 121 -127 .
[3] 丁超，郭兰，闫继福. 子长油田安定地区延长组长6 油层成藏条件分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1): 46 -50 .
[4] 李彦山，张占松，张超谟，陈鹏. 应用压汞资料对长庆地区长6 段储层进行分类研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 91 -93 .
[5] 罗 鹏,李国蓉,施泽进,周大志,汤鸿伟,张德明. 川东南地区茅口组层序地层及沉积相浅析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(2): 74 -78 .
[6] 左国平，屠小龙，夏九峰. 苏北探区火山岩油气藏类型研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(2): 37 -41 .
[7] 王飞宇. 提高热采水平井动用程度的方法与应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(Z1): 100 -103 .
[8] 袁云峰，才业，樊佐春，姜懿洋，秦启荣，蒋庆平. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带石炭系火山岩储层裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(1): 47 -51 .
[9] 袁剑英，付锁堂，曹正林，阎存凤，张水昌，马达德. 柴达木盆地高原复合油气系统多源生烃和复式成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(3): 7 -14 .
[10] 耿燕飞，张春生，韩校锋，杨大超. 安岳—合川地区低阻气层形成机理研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(3): 70 -74 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发