岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 24–33.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200303

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

海拉尔盆地外围凹陷南一段烃源岩生烃动力学研究

谢明贤, 陈广坡, 李娟, 马凤良, 宋晓微   

  1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院 西北分院, 兰州 730020
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-11 修回日期:2019-10-29 出版日期:2020-05-21 发布日期:2020-04-30
  • 作者简介:谢明贤(1988-),女,硕士,工程师,主要从事烃源岩评价、油气成藏等方面的研究工作。地址:(730020)甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号。Email:xiemingxian@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技项目“海拉尔盆地富油气断陷综合研究与有利区带价”（编号：101017kt1604003x20）资助

Hydrocarbon generation kinetics of source rocks of the first member of Nantun Formation in peripheral sags of Hailar Basin

XIE Mingxian, CHEN Guangpo, LI Juan, MA Fengliang, SONG Xiaowei   

  1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development-Northwest, Lanzhou 730020, China
  • Received:2019-07-11 Revised:2019-10-29 Online:2020-05-21 Published:2020-04-30

PDF (PC)

332

摘要： 为了厘清海拉尔盆地外围红旗、东明和伊敏凹陷南屯组一段烃源岩的生烃潜力和现处的生烃演化阶段，采用封闭体系黄金管高压釜对南一段烃源岩进行了生烃动力学研究，结果表明：气态烃动力学参数差异较大，伊敏凹陷主频活化能最高，红旗凹陷次之，东明凹陷最低。液态烃动力学参数中红旗凹陷平均和主频活化能最低，伊敏凹陷活化能分布表现为双峰特征，东明凹陷主频活化能最高，伊敏次之，红旗凹陷最低。研究区寻找气藏的可能性很低，生烃史恢复结果表明南一段烃源岩于早白垩世进入生油门限，现今仍处于低成熟-成熟阶段早期，油的转化率12.67%～39.50%，仅发生少量排烃。制约生油量的最主要因素是有机质未达到生烃高峰，致使生烃量及资源量有限，油气勘探的重点在于寻找其下部铜钵庙组、塔木兰沟组古地温相对较高、生油潜力较强的烃源岩或南屯组烃源岩局部成熟区域。

关键词: 生烃动力学, 封闭体系, 黄金管热模拟, 生烃史, 资源量, 南屯组, 海拉尔盆地

Abstract: In order to clarify the hydrocarbon generation potential and present hydrocarbon generation evolution stage of the source rocks of the first member of Nantun Formation in Hongqi,Dongming and Yimin sags on the periphery of Hailar Basin,the hydrocarbon generation kinetics of the source rocks of the first member of Nantun Formation was studied by using a confined system gold tube autoclave. The results show that the kinetic parameters of gaseous hydrocarbons in each sag are quite different,and the main frequency activation energy increases orderly from Dongming sag to Hongqi and Yimin sags. Among the kinetic parameters of liquid hydrocarbon,the average and main frequency activation energy in Hongqi sag are the lowest,the distribution of activation energy in Yimin sag shows double peak characteristics,and the main frequency activation energy increases orderly from Hongqi sag to Yimin and Dongming sags. The possibility of searching for gas reservoirs in the study area is very low. The result of hydrocarbon generation history recovery indicates that the K1 n1 source rocks entered the oil generation threshold in early Cretaceous,and are still in the early stage of low maturity to maturity. The oil conversion rate is 12.67%-39.50%,and only a small amount of hydrocarbon expulsion occurs. The key factor restricting oil generation is that organic matter has not reached the peak of hydrocarbon generation, resulting in limited hydrocarbon generation and resources. The focus of oil and gas exploration is to find source rocks of Tongbomiao Formation and Tamulangou Formation in the lower part with relatively high paleotemperature and strong oil generation potential or local mature areas of source rocks of Nantun Formation.

Key words: hydrocarbon generation kinetics, confined system, gold tube pyrolysis simulation, hydrocarbon generation history, resources, Nantun Formation, Hailar Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1+1
[1] TISSORT B P,WELTE D H. Petroleum formation and occurrence. New York:Springer-Verlag,1984.
[2] SHI S,TAN W,SUN J S. Progress in kinetic predictions for complex reaction of hydrocarbons:from mechanism studies to industrial applications. Reviews in Chemical Engineering,2016, 32(3):363-378.
[3] WANG M,LU S F,XUE H T. Kinetic simulation of hydrocarbon generation from lacustrine type Ⅰ kerogen from the Songliao Basin:Model comparison and geological application. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2011,28(9):1714-1726.
[4] 李贤庆,肖贤明,米敬奎,等.应用生烃动力学方法研究库车坳陷烃源岩生烃史.煤田地质与勘探,2005,5(33):29-33. LI X Q,XIAO X M,MI J K,et al. The study on hydrocarbon generation histories in Kuqa Depression using the method of kinetics. Coal Geology&Exploration,2005,5(33):29-33.
[5] Kinetic study of marine and lacustrine shale grains using RockEval pyrolysis:Implications to hydrocarbon generation,retention and expulsion. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2018,89:164-173.
[6] 汤庆艳,张铭杰,张同伟,等.生烃热模拟实验方法评述.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2013,35(1):52-62. TANG Q Y,ZHANG M J,ZHANG T W,et al. Areview on pyrolysis experimentation on hydrocarbon generation. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science&Technology Edition), 2013,35(1):52-62.
[7] 饶松,胡圣标,汪集旸.有机质生烃动力学参数研究进展:回顾和展望.地球物理学进展,2018,25(4):1424-1432. RAO S,HU S B,WANG J Y. Hydrocarban generation kinetic parameters of organic matter:review and outlook. Progress in Geophysics,2018,25(4):1424-1432.
[8] 刘畅,苏龙,关宝文,等.茂名油页岩生烃演化特征及热解动力学:以琼东南盆地地质模型为例.岩性油气藏,2014,26(6):89-97. LIU C,SU L,GUAN B W,et al. Thermolytic dynamics and hydrocarbon generation characteristics of Maoming Oil Shale:Taking the geological model of Qiongdongnan Basin as an example. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(6):89-97.
[9] 曹怀仁.松辽盆地烃源岩形成环境与页岩油地质评价研究.广州:中国科学院大学(中国科学院广州地球化学研究所), 2017:40-62. CAO H R. The paleo-enviroment of source rock formation and geological evaluation of shale oil in the Songliao Basin. Guangzhou:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry,Chinese Academy of Sciences), 2017:40-62.
[10] 卢双舫,王民,王跃文,等.密闭体系与开放体系模拟实验结果的比较研究及其意义.沉积学报,2006,24(2):282-288. LU S F,WANG M,WANG Y W,et al. Comparison of simulation results from the closed and open experimental systems and its significance. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2006,24(2):282-288.
[11] 吉鸿杰,邱振,陶辉飞,等.烃源岩特征与生烃动力学研究:以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例.岩性油气藏, 2016,28(4):34-42. JI H J,QIU Z,TAO H F,et al. Source rock characteristics and hydrocarbon generation kinetics:a case study of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar sag,Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(4):34-42.
[12] 彭平安,秦艳,张辉,等.封闭体系有机质与有机碳氢氮恢复动力学研究.海相油气地质,2008,13(2):27-36. PENG P A,QIN Y,ZHANG H,et al. Kinetics of kerogen transformation by heating in closed system. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2008,13(2):27-36.
[13] 张辉,彭平安,刘大永,等.开放体系下有机质与有机碳、氢、氮损失动力学研究.地质学报,2008,82(5):710-720. ZHANG H,PENG P A,LIU D Y,et al. Weight loss of organic matter,organic carbon,hydrogen and nitrogen in an open system:Kinetic approaches. Acta Geologica Sinica,2008,82(5):710-720.
[14] 王晖,张磊,石军太,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部山西组泥页岩生烃热模拟实验.天然气地球科学,2017,28(7):1078-1084. WANG H,ZHANG L,SHI J T,et al. Hydrocarbon generation simulation of source rocks in Shanxi Formation of Ordos Basin.Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(7):1078-1084.
[15] 郭少斌,毛文静,马啸.低熟页岩生烃特征的热模拟实验研究.地学前缘,2017,24(6):365-369. GUO S B,MAO W J,MA X. Thermal simulation experiment study of the hydrocarbon generation characteristics of low maturity shale. Earth Science Frontiers,2017,24(6):365-369.
[16] WANG Z X,WANG Y L,WU B X,et al. Hydrocarbon gas generatin from pryolysis of extracts and residues of low maturity solid bitumens from the Sichuan Basin,China. Organic Geochemistry,2017,103:51-62.
[17] 薛会,张金川,刘丽芳,等.天然气机理类型及其分布.地球科学与环境学报,2006,28(2):53-57. XUE H,ZHANG J C,LIU L F,et al. Distribution and mechanic classification of gas. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2006,28(2):53-57.
[17] 卢双舫,王琼,李吉君,等.低熟气评价方法及其在松辽盆地北部的应用.天然气地球科学,2008,19(1):8-12. LU S F,WANG Q,LI J J,et al. Evaluation method of low mature gaseous and its application in North Songliao Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience,2008,19(1):8-12.
[19] 刘洋,何坤,李贤庆,等.湖相烃源岩生烃动力学及排油效率:以松辽盆地青山口组为例.现代地质,2016,30(3):627-634. LIU Y,HE K,LI X Q,et al. Hydrocarbon generation kinetics and the efficiency of petroleum expulsion of lacustrine source rocks:Taking the Qingshankou Formation in the Songliao Basin as an example. Geoscience,2016,30(3):627-634.
[20] HAN H,ZHONG N N,HUANG C X,et al. Pyrolysis kinetics of oil shale from northeast China:Implications from thermogravimetric and rock-eval experiments. Fuel,2015,159:776-783.
[21] PEPPER A S,CORVI P J. Simple kinetic models of petroleum formation. Part I:Oil and gas generation from kerogen. Marine and Petroleum Geology,1995,12(3):291-319.
[22] 陈均亮,吴河勇,朱德丰,等.海拉尔盆地构造演化及油气勘探前景.地质科学,2007,42(1):147-159. CHEN J L,WU H Y,ZHU D F,et al. Tectonic evolution of the Hailar Basin and its potentials of oil-gas exploration. Chinese Journal of Geology (Scientia Geologica Sinica),2007,42(1):147-159.
[23] 张晓东,李敬生,侯艳平,等.海拉尔盆地红旗凹陷构造演化及其对成藏的控制作用.大庆石油地质与开发,2019,38(5):117-125. ZHANG X D,LI J S,HOU Y P,et al. Controlling action of the tectonic evolution on the hydrocarbon accumulation in Hongqi Sag of Hailer Basin. Petroleum Geology&Oilfield Development in Daqing,2019,38(5):117-125.
[24] 刘立峰,姜振学,钟宁宁,等.辽河西部凹陷古近系烃源岩生烃动力学特征.地球科学(中国地质大学学报),2009,34(5):799-805. LIU L F,JIANG Z X,ZHONG N N,et al. Hydrocarbon generating dynamic characteristics of Paleogene source rocks in western depression,Liaohe Basin. Earth Science (Journal of China University of Geosciences),2009,34(5):799-805.
[25] JIANG Q G,WANG Y B,QIN J Z,et al. Kinetics of the hydrocarbon generation process of marine source rocks in South China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(2):174-180.
[26] 王军,王清斌,王飞龙,等.渤海海域渤中地区烃源岩封闭金管热解模拟生烃实验研究.石油实验地质,2017,39(3):423-430. WANG J,WANG Q B,WANG F L,et al. Gold tube pyrolysis study of source rock hydrocarbon generation in Bozhong area, offshore Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2017,39(3):423-430.
[27] 崔军平,任战利.海拉尔盆地古地温研究.地质科技情报, 2013,32(4):151-156. CUI J P,REN Z L. Research on the paleotemperature in Hailaer Basin. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2013,32(4):151-156.
[28] 牛成民,金强,李培培,等.辽东湾古近系烃源岩生烃动力学研究.海相油气地质,2018,23(1):91-96. NIU C M,JIN Q,LI P P,et al. Kinetic study on oil and gas generation from Paleogene source rocks in Liaodong Bay area, northern China. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2018,23(1):91-96.
[1] 冯德浩, 刘成林, 田继先, 太万雪, 李培, 曾旭, 卢振东, 郭轩豪. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近系盆地模拟及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 74-84.
[2] 姚海鹏, 于东方, 李玲, 林海涛. 内蒙古地区典型煤储层吸附特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 1-8.
[3] 隋立伟. 塔南凹陷古地貌特征对沉积体系和油气分布的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 48-58.
[4] 刘刚, 赵谦平, 刘超, 孙建博, 尹锦涛. 延长油气区页岩气可采系数标定研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 51-58.
[5] 李娟, 孙松领, 陈广坡, 张斌, 洪亮, 何巍巍. 海拉尔盆地浅变质岩潜山岩性控储特征及储层岩性序列识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4): 26-36.
[6] 吉鸿杰，邱振，陶辉飞，马东旭，廖朋，王琪. 烃源岩特征与生烃动力学研究——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4): 34-42.
[7] 苟红光，赵莉莉，梁桂宾，佘家朝，刘俊田. EUR 分级类比法在致密油资源评价中的应用—— 以三塘湖盆地芦草沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3): 27-33.
[8] 伊 伟1，熊先钺1，王 伟1，刘 玲2. 鄂尔多斯盆地合阳地区煤层气赋存特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(2): 38-45.
[9] 潘中亮,陈 巍,王正来,李 全,苏 磊,赵容怀. 海拉尔盆地乌南次凹南屯组致密储层黏土矿物特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(1): 21-25.
[10] 王正来，姜洪福，关琳琳，潘中亮，许艳龙. 海拉尔盆地复杂断块油藏优势储层形成机理探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(1): 26-31.
[11] 刘 畅,苏 龙,关宝文,郑有伟,常 江，郑建京 . 茂名油页岩生烃演化特征及热解动力学—— — 以琼东南盆地地质模型为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(6): 89-97.
[12] 吴海波，王江，李军辉. 地震多属性融合技术在贝尔凹陷储层预测中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(2): 96-101.
[13] 张小龙，张同伟，李艳芳，闫建萍，张铭杰，胡沛青. 页岩气勘探和开发进展综述[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(2): 116-122.
[14] 张莹. 伸展褶皱及其对油气聚集的控制作用———以海拉尔盆地贝中次凹为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(2): 16-20.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张　俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军，张吉，王彩丽，王晓蓉，李世临，刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰，卫平生，李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇，胡明毅，刘富艳，王辉，胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙，田景春，肖玲，王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维，李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮，涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发