岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 105–115.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220210

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

渤海湾盆地埕北断阶带断裂发育特征及其控藏作用

缪欢1, 王延斌1, 何川2, 李建红1, 张伟2, 张雨建1, 龚训1   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学(北京)地球科学与测绘工程学院, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国石油大港油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 天津 300280
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-12 修回日期:2021-09-09 出版日期:2022-04-01 发布日期:2022-03-14
  • 作者简介:缪欢(1997-),男,中国矿业大学(北京)在读硕士研究生,研究方向为常规与非常规石油天然气地质。地址:(100083)北京市海淀区学院路丁11号。Email:1627765379@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“深部煤储层精细描述及甜点区预测”（编号：2016ZX05066001-002）和“低效井区低产主控因素分析”（编号：2017ZX05064003-001）联合资助

Fault development characteristics and reservoir control in Chengbei fault step zone, Bohai Bay Basin

MIAO Huan1, WANG Yanbin1, HE Chuan2, LI Jianhong1, ZHANG Wei2, ZHANG Yujian1, GONG Xun1   

  1. 1. School of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China
  • Received:2021-04-12 Revised:2021-09-09 Online:2022-04-01 Published:2022-03-14

PDF (PC)

227

摘要： 为研究渤海湾盆地埕北断阶带主干断层的发育特征及其与上古生界烃源岩二次生烃成藏的关系，开展了地震资料解释、钻井资料分析和各时代底面构造特征研究，精细刻画了区内张北、张东、赵北和羊二庄4条主干断层几何形态、活动性和封堵性特征。结果表明：①研究区主干断层断面呈铲式或坡坪式，与两侧的次级断裂在剖面呈“Y”字型、花状等构造样式，在平面上呈羽状、雁列状；各主干断层在Es期内的活动性最强，Ng期最弱；张东断层和赵北断层在Ed期的封堵性较差，Ng期封堵性好；张北断层在Ed期的封堵性好，Ng期的封堵性较差；羊二庄断层在Ed期和Nm期的封堵性均为较好；②歧口主凹上古生界烃源岩在Es3期内达到生烃高峰期，现今为过成熟阶段；埕北断阶带上古生界烃源岩在新近系达到生烃高峰，且现今仍处于生烃高峰期；③Ed期至现今，埕北断阶带内各成藏要素比配极好，为上古生界油气藏形成的关键时期，上古生界原生油气藏主要为自生自储的背斜油气藏、断块-断鼻油气藏和新生古储的古潜山油气藏，其中背斜油气藏和断块—断鼻油气藏在全区均有分布，而古潜山油气藏分布于张东潜山。该研究成果可为埕北断阶带上古生界油气勘探提供依据。

关键词: 主干断层, 二次生烃, 油气成藏, 上古生界, 埕北断阶带, 渤海湾盆地

Abstract: In order to study the development characteristics of the main faults in Chengbei fault step zone of Bohai Bay Basin and its relationship with the secondary hydrocarbon generation and accumulation of Upper Paleozoic source rocks, seismic data interpretation, drilling data analysis and bottom structural characteristics of each era were carried out, and the geometric shape, activity and sealing characteristics of four main faults in Zhangbei, Zhangdong, Zhaobei and Yang'erzhuang were characterized. The results show that:(1) The main fault section in the study area is shovel type or slope flat type, and the secondary faults on both sides are in "Y" shape and flower shape in the section, and in feather and en echelon shape in horizontal plane. The activity of each main fault is the strongest in Es stage and the weakest in Ng stage. The sealing properties of Zhangdong fault and Zhaobei fault were poor in Ed stage but good in Ng stage, the sealing properties of Zhangbei fault were good in Ed stage but poor in Ng stage, and the sealing properties of Yang'erzhuang fault were good in both Ed stage and Nm stage.(2) The Upper Paleozoic source rocks in Qikou main depression reached the peak of hydrocarbon generation in Es3 stage, and now it is an over mature stage. The Upper Paleozoic source rocks in Chengbei fault step zone reached the peak of hydrocarbon generation in Neogene, and now are still in the peak of hydrocarbon generation.(3) The reservoir accumulation elements in Chengbei fault step zone are well matched from Ed stage to present which are the key stage for the formation of Upper Paleozoic reservoirs. The primary reservoirs of Upper Paleozoic are mainly self-source and self-reservoir anticline reservoirs, fault block and fault nose reservoirs, and buried hill reservoirs with young source in old reservoir, among which the former two are distributed in the whole area, and the last are distributed in Zhangdong buried hill. The research results can provide a basis for Upper Paleozoic oil and gas exploration in Chengbei fault step zone.

Key words: main fault, secondary hydrocarbon generation, hydrocarbon accumulation, Upper Paleozoic, Chengbei fault step zone, Bohai Bay Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 肖敦清, 姜文亚, 蒲秀刚, 等.渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷中深层天然气成藏条件与资源潜力[J].天然气地球科学, 2018, 29 (10):1409-1421. XIAO Dunqing, JIANG Wenya, PU Xiugang, et al. Natural gas formation conditions and resource potential in mid-deep strata of the Qikou Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(10):1409-1421.
[2] JIANG Fujie, PANG Xiongqi, BAI Jing, et al. Comprehensive assessment of source rocks in the Bohai Sea area, eastern China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2016, 100(6):969-1002.
[3] 于学敏, 冯明, 滑双君.从古生界的生烃条件看大港探区深部的勘探前景[J].勘探家, 1998(4):13-16. YU Xuemin, FENG Ming, HUA Shuangjun. Deep exploration prospect in Dagang exploration area based on the Paleozoic hydrocarbon generation conditions[J]. Petroleum Explorationist, 1998 (4):13-16.
[4] 廖前进, 于学敏, 何咏梅, 等.大港探区上古生界煤系烃源岩特征及资源潜力[J].天然气地球科学, 2003, 4(4):250-253. LIAO Qianjin, YU Xuemin, HE Yongmei, et al. The characteristics and resource potential of coal-bearing formations in Upper Paleozoic in Dagang Oilfield[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2003, 14(4):250-253.
[5] 赵贤正, 蒲秀刚, 姜文亚, 等.黄骅坳陷古生界含油气系统勘探突破及其意义[J].石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(4):621-632. ZHAO Xianzheng, PU Xiugang, JIANG Wenya, et al. An exploration breakthrough in Paleozoic petroleum system of Huanghua Depression in Dagang Oilfield and its significance, North China[J]. Petroleum Exploration & Development, 2019, 46(4):621-632.
[6] 金凤鸣, 王鑫, 李宏军, 等.渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷乌马营潜山内幕原生油气藏形成特征[J].石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(3):521-529. JIN Fengming, WANG Xin, LI Hongjun, et al. Formation of the primary petroleum reservoir in Wumaying inner buried-hill of Huanghua Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(3):521-529.
[7] 尹向烟.黄骅坳陷北大港凸起中生界、上古生界潜山油气资源潜力评价[M].东营:中国石油大学(华东), 2018. YIN Xiangyan. The oil and gas resource potential assessment in Mesozoic and Upper Paleozoic in Beidagang Uplift, Huanghua Depression[M]. Dongying:China University of Petroleum(East China), 2018.
[8] 高长海, 张新征, 查明.歧口凹陷埕北断阶带输导体系特征及其对油气分布的控制[J].石油地质与工程, 2012, 26(2):1-6. GAO Changhai, ZHANG Xinzheng, ZHA Ming. Carrying bed system feature and its controlling on oil & gas distribution in Chengbei fault step belt of Qikou Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2012, 26(2):1-6.
[9] 曲江秀, 查明, 高长海, 等.大港油田埕北断阶带油气运移、成藏期次及成藏模式[J].海相油气地质, 2009, 14(3):37-45. QU Jiangxiu, ZHA Ming, GAO Changhai, et al. Models of hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in Chengbei fault step belt in Dagang Oilfield[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2009, 14(3):37-45.
[10] 高长海, 查明.大港油田埕北断阶带不整合与油气运聚[J].岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1):37-42. GAO Changhai, ZHA Ming. Unconformity surface and hydrocarbon migra-tion and accumulation in Chengbei fault step belt of Dagang Oilfield[. J] Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(1):37-42.
[11] 吴雪松, 赵仕民, 肖敦清, 等.埕北断阶带油气成藏条件与模式研究[J].天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(3):362-371. WU Xuesong, ZHAO Shimin, XIAO Dunqing, et al. Hydrocarbon accumula-tion model of Chengbei fault step zone[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2009, 20(3):362-371.
[12] 高长海, 查明.大港油田埕北断阶带油气成藏过程分析[J].石油天然气学报, 2008, 30(4):47-53. GAO Changhai, ZHA Ming. Hydrocarbon accumulation process in Chengbei fault step belt of Dagang Oilfield[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2008, 30(4):47-53.
[13] 王洪宇, 付晓飞, 王海学, 等.渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷断裂活动定量分析和评价对油气成藏的控制作用研究[J].地质学报, 2020, 94(10):3062-3073. WANG Hongyu, FU Xiaofei, WANG Haixue, et al. Research on the controlling effect of quantitative analysis and evaluation of fault activity on oil and gas accumulation in Qikou Sag of Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2020, 94(10):3062-3073.
[14] 付广, 王宇鹏.断裂密集带及附近下生上储式油气富集的控制因素.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2):23-29. FU Guang, WANG Yupeng. Controlling factors of hydrocarbon enrichment with the type of "below source and upper reservoir" in fault concentrated zones and nearby[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(2):23-29.
[15] 马钰凯, 孙永河, 马妍, 等.渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷构造演化及断裂带成因.石油学报, 2020, 41(5):526-539. MA Yukai, SUN Yonghe, MA Yan, et al. Tectonic evolution and genesis of fault zones in Qikou Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(5):526-539.
[16] 魏真真, 王丙贤, 杨静.歧口凹陷断裂构造特征及其控油气作用[J].科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(11):4288-4295. WEI Zhenzhen, WANG Binxian, YANG Jing. Structural characteristics of fault and its control on oil and gas distribution in Qikou Sag[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20 (11):4288-4295.
[17] 袁淑琴, 周凤春, 张洪娟, 等.埕海断裂缓坡区构造特征与油气聚集规律[J].长江大学学报(自科版), 2018, 15(15):16-22. YUAN Shuqin, ZHOU Fengchun, ZHANG Hongjuan, et al. The structural characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation regularity of gentle slope belt in Chenghai area of Huanghua Depression[J]. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 15(15):16-22.
[18] 赵万优, 王振升, 苏俊青, 等.黄骅坳陷埕北断阶带油气成藏系统[J].石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(1):34-39. ZHAO Wanyou, WANG Zhensheng, SU Junqing, et al. Pool forming system of Chengbei fault-step zone in Huanghua Depression[J]. Petroleum Exploration & Development, 2008, 35(1):34-39.
[19] 王光奇, 李三忠, 周立宏, 等.张东断层成因机制及其与油气成藏关系[J].石油勘探与开发, 2002, 29(6):38-40. WANG Guangqi, LI Sanzhong, ZHOU Lihong, et al. Relation between petroleum accumulation and genetic mechanism of Zhangdong fault in Huanghua Depression[J]. Petroleum Exploration & Development, 2002, 29(6):38-40.
[20] 张莹, 刘强, 陈清华.大港南部滩海区构造与油气分布[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2007, 27(3):85-91. ZHANG Ying, LIU Qiang, CHEN Qinghua. Structural characters and oil-gas distribution in south beach area of Dagang Oilfield[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2007, 27(3):85-91.
[21] 许立青, 李三忠, 索艳慧, 等.渤海湾盆地大歧口凹陷断裂系统与陆内拉分断陷[J].地质科学, 2015, 50(2):489-502. XU Liqing, LI Sanzhong, SUO Yanhui, et al. Fault system and basin prototype of the great Qikou Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology(Scientia Geologica Sinica), 2015, 50 (2):489-502.
[22] 赵勇, 戴俊生.应用落差分析研究生长断层[J].石油勘探与开发, 2003, 30(3):13-15. ZHAO Yong, DAI Junsheng. Identification of growth fault by fault fall analysis[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003, 30(3):13-15.
[23] 张伟忠, 查明, 韩宏伟, 等.东营凹陷边界断层活动性与沉积演化耦合关系的量化表征[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(4):18-26. ZHANG Weizhong, ZHA Ming, HAN Hongwei, et al. Quantitative research of coupling relationship between boundary fault activity and sedi-mentary evolution in Dongying Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 41(4):18-26.
[24] 雷宝华.生长断层活动强度定量研究的主要方法评述[J].地球科学进展, 2012, 27(9):947-956. LEI Baohua. Review of methods with quantitative studies of activity intensity of the growth fault[J]. Advances in Earth Sciences, 2012, 27(9):947-956.
[25] 卢异, 王书香, 陈松, 等.一种断裂活动强度计算方法及其应用[J].天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(4):612-616. LU Yi, WANG Shuxiang, CHEN Song, et al. Computing method about intensity of fault activity and its application[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2010, 21(4):612-616.
[26] 李勤英, 罗凤芝, 苗翠芝.断层活动速率研究方法及应用探讨[J].断块油气田, 2000, 7(2):15-17. LI Qingying, LUO Fengzhi, MIAO Cuizhi. Research on fault activity ratio and its application[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2000, 7(2):15-17.
[27] 张飞鹏, 吴智平, 李伟, 等.黄骅坳陷印支-燕山期构造特征及其演化过程[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2019, 48(4):842-857. ZHANG Feipeng, WU Zhiping, LI Wei, et al. Structural characteristics and its tectonic evolution of Huanghua Depression during the Indosinian-Yanshanian[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2019, 48(4):842-857.
[28] 付立新, 楼达, 李宏军, 等.印支-燕山运动对大港探区古潜山形成的控制作用[J].石油学报, 2016, 37(增刊 2):19-30. FU Lixin, LOU Da, LI Hongjun, et al. Control effect of Indosinian-Yanshanian movement on the formation of buried hill in Dagang Exploration area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(Suppl 2):19-30.
[29] 周立宏, 卢异, 肖敦清, 等.渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷盆地结构构造及演化[J].天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(3):373-382. ZHOU Lihong, LU Yi, XIAO Dunqing, et al. Basinal texture structure of Qikou Sag, Bohai Bay Basin and its evolution[J]. Natural gas Geosciences, 2011, 22(3):373-382.
[30] 张志攀.黄骅坳陷歧口凹陷新生代主要断裂与油气成藏[J].天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(5):679-684. ZHANG Zhipan. The relationship between main fault & hydrocarbon accumulation in Cenozoic Qikou Sag of Huanghua Depression[J]. Natural gas Geosciences, 2014, 25(5):679-684.
[31] 万天丰, 王明明, 殷秀兰, 等.渤海湾地区不同方向断裂带的封闭性[J].现代地质, 2004, 18(2):157-163. WAN Tianfeng, WANG Mingming, YIN Xiulan, et al. Sealing properties of different direction faults in the Bohai Bay area[J]. Geoscience, 2004, 18(2):157-163.
[32] 万天丰.中国东部中、新生带板内变形、构造应力场及其应用[M].北京:地质出版社, 1993. WAN Tianfeng. Intraplate deformation, tectonic stress field and its application in Mesozoic and Cenozoic zones in eastern China[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1993.
[33] 张津宁, 周建生, 肖敦清, 等.黄骅坳陷中生代构造运动对上古生界煤系烃源岩生烃演化的控制[J].天然气工业, 2019, 39(9):1-10. ZHANG Jinning, ZHOU Jiansheng, XIAO Dunqing, et al. Control of Mesozoic tectonic movement on the hydrocarbon generation and evolution of Upper Paleozoic coal-measure source rocks in the Huanghua Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(9):1-10.
[34] 闫文琦, 李娇娜, 孙永河.黄骅坳陷上古生界埋藏史研究及生烃有利区预测[J].矿产勘查, 2020, 11(8):1690-1696. YAN Wenqi, LI Jiaona, SUN Yonghe. Burial history of Upper Paleozoic and prediction of favorable hydrocarbon-generating areas in Huanghua Depression[J]. Mineral Exploration, 2020, 11(8):1690-1696.
[35] 杨润泽, 赵贤正, 李宏军, 等.黄骅坳陷上古生界烃源灶排烃特征及供烃模式[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(2):367-380. YANG Runze, ZHAO Xianzheng, LI Hongjun, et al. Hydrocarbon expulsion characteristics and hydrocarbon supply model of Upper Paleozoic source stoves in Huanghua Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2020, 49(2):367-380.
[36] 陈建平, 赵长毅, 何忠华.煤系有机质生烃潜力评价标准探讨[J].石油勘探与开发, 1997, 24(1):1-5. CHEN Jianping, ZHAO Changyi, HE Zhonghua. Criteria for evaluating the hydrocarbon generating potential of organic matter in coal measures[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1997, 24(1):1-5.
[37] 侯中帅, 陈世悦, 桑树勋, 等.渤海湾盆地上古生界泥岩地球化学特征[J].煤炭学报, 2020, 45(4):1457-1472. HOU Zhongshuai, CHEN Shiyue, SANG Shuxun, et al. Geochemical characteristics of Upper Paleozoic mudstone in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(4):1457-1472.
[38] 郭萍.渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷上古生界煤系烃源岩地球化学特征与生烃演化[J].天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(9):1306-1315. GUO Ping. Geochemical characteristics and hydrocarbon generation evolution of Upper Paleozoic coal measures in Jizhong Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Natural gas Geosciences, 2020, 31(9):1306-1315.
[39] 李超, 姜承鑫.盆地沉降分析中的两类沉降[J].中国科技信息, 2011(19):48-49. LI Chao, JIANG Chengxin. Two types of subsidence in basin subsidence analysis[J]. China Science and Technology Information, 2011(19):48-49.
[40] 张长厚, 李程明, 邓洪菱, 等.燕山-太行山北段中生代收缩变形与华北克拉通破坏[J].中国科学(地球科学), 2011, 41(5):593-617. ZHANG Changhou, LI Chengming, DENG Hongling, et al. Mesozoic contraction deformation in the Yanshan and northern Taihang mountains and its implications to the destruction of the North China Craton[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 2011, 41(5):593-617.
[41] WANG Yu, ZHOU Liyun, ZHAO Lijun. Cratonic reactivation and orogeny:An example from the northern margin of the North China Craton[J]. Gondwana Research, 2013, 24(3/4):1203-1222.
[42] HU Jianmin, ZHAO Yue, LIU Xiaowen, et al. Early Mesozoic deformations of the eastern Yanshan thrust belt, northern China[J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2010, 99(4):785-800.
[43] 蒋有录, 刘学嘉, 赵贤正, 等.根据储层沥青和流体包裹体综合判识油气成藏期:以黄骅坳陷北大港古生界潜山为例[J].地球科学, 2020, 45(3):980-988. JIANG Youlu, LIU Xuejia, ZHAO Xianzheng, et al. Comprehensive identification of oil and gas accumulation period by fluid inclusion technique and reservoir bitumen characteristics:A case study of the Paleozoic Buried hill in Beidagang, Huanghua Depression[J]. Earth Science, 2020, 45(3):980-988.
[44] 田建章, 陈勇, 侯凤香, 等.储层沥青拉曼光谱特征及其对油气成藏期次的约束:以冀中坳陷杨税务潜山为例[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2021, 41(1):131-135. TIAN Jianzhang, CHEN Yong, HOU Fengxiang, et al. Raman spectroscopic characteristics of reservoir bitumen and its constraints on stages of hydrocarbon accumulation:Take Yangshuiwu buried hill of Jizhong Depression as an Example[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2021, 41(1):131-135.
[45] 付立新, 吴雪松, 赵敏, 等.歧口凹陷埕海潜山地质构造及奥陶系天然气成藏特点[J].东北石油大学学报, 2013, 37(5):63-72. FU Lixin, WU Xuesong, ZHAO Min, et al. Structural geology and gas accumulation in Ordovician reservoir in Chenghai buriedhill in Qikou Sag[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2013, 37(5):63-72.
[46] 魏恒飞, 李秋媛, 毕建军, 等.论烃源岩层系含油气系统[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 2020, 39(6):1-12. WEI Hengfei, LI Qiuyuan, BI Jianjun, et al. Discussion on the petroleum system of hydrocarbon source-rock series[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2020, 39 (6):1-12.
[1] 邵晓州, 王苗苗, 齐亚林, 贺彤彤, 张晓磊, 庞锦莲, 郭懿萱. 鄂尔多斯盆地平凉北地区长8油藏特征及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 59-69.
[2] 张汶, 吕世聪, 赵大林, 贾海松, 蔡越钎. 渤海湾盆地西南部古近系滩坝沉积特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 85-94.
[3] 黄芸, 杨德相, 李玉帮, 胡明毅, 季汉成, 樊杰, 张晓芳, 王元杰. 冀中坳陷杨税务奥陶系深潜山储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 70-80.
[4] 高计县, 孙文举, 吴鹏, 段长江. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘神府区块上古生界致密砂岩成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 121-130.
[5] 卢恩俊, 柳少波, 于志超, 鲁雪松, 成定树. 柴达木盆地英雄岭南带断裂活动特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 161-174.
[6] 胡贺伟, 李慧勇, 许鹏, 陶莉, 华晓莉. 断裂密集带油气差异富集主控因素探讨——以歧口凹陷歧南断阶带为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 34-45.
[7] 朱珍君, 黄光明, 邱津, 刘康宁, 李琦, 胡俊杰. 哈萨克斯坦斋桑盆地构造特征及其对油气成藏的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 23-35.
[8] 刘俞佐, 石万忠, 刘凯, 王任, 吴睿. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗东部地区上古生界天然气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 56-67.
[9] 关华, 郭平, 赵春兰, 谭保国, 徐冬梅. 渤海湾盆地永安油田永66区块氮气驱油机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 149-160.
[10] 郑庆华, 尤继元. 黄骅坳陷王官屯构造带白垩系火山岩油气成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 44-51.
[11] 唐建云, 张刚, 史政, 章星, 陈玉宝. 鄂尔多斯盆地丰富川地区延长组流体包裹体特征及油气成藏期次[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 20-26.
[12] 赵汉卿, 温慧芸, 穆朋飞, 李超, 吴穹螈. 垦利A油田沙三上段近源辫状河三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 37-44.
[13] 李沛, 张金川, 唐玄, 霍志鹏, 李振, 刘君兰, 李中明. 南华北盆地中牟—温县区块上古生界页岩气吸附特性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 66-75.
[14] 洪亮, 陈彬滔, 刘雄志, 惠学智, 房乃珍, 苏玉平. Muglad盆地Kaikang槽西斜坡沉积演化及其油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 8-15.
[15] 白晓寅, 韩长春, 贺永红, 任来义, 马芳侠, 陈治军, 刘护创. 银额盆地哈日凹陷火成岩发育特征及其成藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 18-26.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发