基于稀疏井网条件下的古辫状河道心滩砂体估算——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2018.01.016

岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 155–164.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2018.01.016

基于稀疏井网条件下的古辫状河道心滩砂体估算——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例

崔连可¹, 单敬福², 李浮萍³, 崔璐¹, 种健⁴

1. 中国石化河南油田分公司采油一厂, 河南南阳 473000;
2. 长江大学油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430100;
3. 中国石油长庆油田分公司苏里格气田研究中心, 西安 710018;
4. 中国石油华北油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 河北任丘 062550

收稿日期:2017-10-25 修回日期:2017-12-17 出版日期:2018-01-21 发布日期:2018-01-21
通讯作者: 单敬福(1977-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事沉积、储层与开发地质学方面的研究工作。地址:(430100)湖北省武汉市长江大学油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室。Email:shanjingfu2003@163.com。 E-mail:shanjingfu2003@163.com
作者简介:崔连可(1991-),男,硕士,主要从事油气田开发方面的研究工作。地址:(473000)河南省南阳市桐柏县埠江镇河南油田分公司采油一厂。Email:cuilianke@139.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“基于物理模拟条件下的点坝侧积体时空分异机理研究”（编号：41372125）资助

Estimating method of braided channel bar under sparse well net: a case from Su X block in Sulige Gas Field

CUI Lianke¹, SHAN Jingfu², LI Fuping³, CUI Lu¹, CHONG Jian⁴

1. No.1 Oil Production Plant, Henan Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Nanyang 473000, Henan, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources, Ministry of Education, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China;
3. Sulige Gas Field Research Center, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710018, China;
4. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield, Renqiu 062550, Hebei, China

Received:2017-10-25 Revised:2017-12-17 Online:2018-01-21 Published:2018-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在辫状河沉积环境中，心滩是油气储集的重要场所，如何从已钻井资料中识别心滩并进行平面组合，进而预测河道内部心滩平面展布规律，是正确认识辫状河沉积的基础。针对苏里格气田苏X区块小层划分与对比、沉积微相平面分布等精细地质研究不够深入和单井产量及最终采收率均较低等问题，基于测录井、野外露头和现代卫星图片等资料，在精细划分地层的基础上，利用单期河道砂厚中心连线法、心滩测井相分异法、心滩雷达图和心滩预测技术对研究区进行单期河道和钻遇心滩的识别与刻画、心滩雷达图的绘制以及预测心滩的刻画。结果表明：研究区盒8下1-1和盒8下1-2单层均发育3支河道；河道内心滩分别给定长厚比60∶1～80∶1、宽厚比30∶1～40∶1、长宽比2∶1～3∶1，心滩长度一般为300～1 100 m，宽度一般为150～550 m；单期河道砂厚与心滩在单一河道内发育的个数呈反比。后期加密井钻探结果显示心滩雷达图和心滩预测技术均具有较高的可信度。上述方法可提高心滩钻遇率，便于后期加密井及水平井的大规模部署，有助于提高油气采收率，为相似地层结构和井网密度的工区在研究砂体平面分布和空间叠置规律方面提供参考。

关键词: 沉积相, 颗粒滩, 奥陶系, 塔里木盆地

Abstract: In the braided river sedimentary environment,braided channel bars are more important reservoir sand body for oil and gas accumulation. How to identify braided channel bars by drilling well data,and then combine in plate,moreover,predict the distribution of channel bars,is the foundation for correctly understanding braided river deposits. The fine geological study of fine subzone division and correlation and sedimentary microfacies distribution in Su X block of Sulige Gas Field is insufficient,and single well yield and ultimate recovery are low. Based on the data of logging,field outcrop and modern satellite images,combined with fine stratum classification,sand thickness center line connecting method,braided bar logging phase separation method,radar map of braided bar and braided bar prediction technology,were used to identify and characterize single channel and braided bar,compile the radar map of braided bar and predict the braided bar. The results show that the layer of 1-1 and 1-2 of the lower He 8 member both developed three channels. The braided bar is given a length to thickness ratio of 60:1-80:1,a width to thickness ratio of 30:1-40:1,and a length to width ratio of 2:1-3:1, while the length is 300-1 100 m and the width is 150-550 m. The single channel sand thickness is inversely proportional to the number of braided bar. The results of infill wells show that the radar map of braided bar and prediction technology both have high credibility. The above methods can improve the drilling ratio of braided bar, provide a better condition for the arrangement of infill wells and horizontal wells and improve oil and gas recovery efficiency,and provide reference for the study of sand body distribution and space superposition in the block with similar stratum structure and well density.

Key words: sedimentary facies, grain banks, Ordovician, Tarim Basin

中图分类号:

TE121.3

崔连可, 单敬福, 李浮萍, 崔璐, 种健. 基于稀疏井网条件下的古辫状河道心滩砂体估算——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 155–164.

CUI Lianke, SHAN Jingfu, LI Fuping, CUI Lu, CHONG Jian. Estimating method of braided channel bar under sparse well net: a case from Su X block in Sulige Gas Field[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1): 155–164.

参考文献

[1] 单敬福,张彬,赵忠军,等.复合辫状河道期次划分方法与沉积演化过程分析——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田西区苏X区块为例.沉积学报,2015,33(4):773-785. SHAN J F,ZHANG B,ZHAO Z J,et al. Single stage and sedimentary evolution process analysis of braided river-a case from Su X block of western Sulige gas field in Ordos Basin. Acta Sediemtologica Sinica,2015,33(4):773-785.
[2] 吴胜和,岳大力,刘建民,等.地下古河道储层构型的层次建模研究.中国科学:D辑地球科学,2008,38(增刊1):111-121. WU S H,YUE D L,LIU J M,et al. Hierarchy modeling of subsurface palaeochannel reservoir architecture. Science China:Series D Earth Sciences,2008,38(Suppl 1):111-121.
[3] 刘琦,孙雷,罗平亚,等.苏里格西区含水气藏合理产能评价方法研究. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2013,35(3):131-136. LIU Q,SUN L,LUO P Y,et al. The research on the proper production capacity evaluations on the west of Sulige gas field. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2013,35(3):131-136.
[4] 何宇航,宋保全,张春生.大庆长垣辫状河砂体物理模拟实验研究与认识.地学前缘,2012,19(2):41-48. HE Y H,SONG B Q,ZHANG C S. A study of braided river sand deposit in Changyuan,Daqing through physical simulation experiments. Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(2):41-48.
[5] 马世忠,孙雨,范广娟,等.地下曲流河道单砂体内部薄夹层建筑结构研究方法.沉积学报,2008,26(4):632-639. MA S Z,SUN Y,FAN G J,et al. The method for studying thin interbed architecture of burial meandering channel sandbody. Acta Sediemtologica Sinica,2008,26(4):632-639.
[6] BEST J L,ASHWORTH P J,BRISTOW C S,et al. Threedimensional sedimentary architecture of a large,mid-channel sand braid bar,Jamuna River,Bangladesh. Journal of Sedimentary Research,2003,73(4):516-530.
[7] 于兴河,马兴祥,穆龙新,等.辫状河储层地质模式及层次界面分析.北京:石油工业出版社,2004:41-59. YU X H,MA X X,MU L X,et al. Analysis of geological model and hierarchical interface of braided river reservoir. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2004:41-59.
[8] 廖保方,张为民,李列,等.辫状河现代沉积研究与相模式——中国永定河剖析.沉积学报,1998,16(1):34-39. LIAO B F,ZHANG W M,LI L,et al. Study on modern deposit of a braided stream and facies model-taking the Yongding river as an example. Acta Sediemtologica Sinica,1998,16(1):34-39.
[9] 董建辉.苏里格地层划分与对比研究.科学技术与工程,2012, 12(14):3443-3445.DONG J H. Stratigraphic division and correlation of Sulige. Science Technology and Engineering,2012,12(14):3443-3445.
[10] 范玲玲,宋荣彩,金文辉,等.鄂尔多斯盆地苏西X井区盒8段砂体发育模式研究.岩性油气藏,2012,24(4):29-33. FAN L L,SONG R C,JIN W H,et al. Study on sand body development model of He 8 member in Suxi X well block of Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2012,24(4):29-33.
[11] 刘建新,雍学善,吴会良,等.苏里格气田盒8段地震多技术储层沉积相研究.岩性油气藏,2007,19(2):80-83. LIU J X,YONG X S,WU H L,et al. Study on sedimentary facies by seismic multiple techniques in the eighth member of Shihezi Formation,Sulige Gas Field. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(2):80-83.
[12] 谢庆宾,谭欣雨,高霞,等.苏里格气田西部主要含气层段储层特征.岩性油气藏,2014,26(4):57-65. XIE Q B,TAN X Y,GAO X,et al. Characteristics of major gasbearing reservoirs in western Sulige Gas Field. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(4):57-65.
[13] 茌卫东.苏里格气田水平井开发分段压裂技术研究.西安:西安石油大学,2013. CHI W D. A study on horizontal well staged fracturing technology in Sulige gas field. Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University,2013.
[14] 张满郎,李熙喆,谷江锐,等.砂体组合的划分及评价——以鄂尔多斯盆地山2段、盒8段为例.岩性油气藏,2009,21(2):12-18. ZHANG M L,LI X Z,GU J R,et al. Division and evaluation of sand body assemblages:an example from Shan 2 and He 8 member of Upper Paleozoic in Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(2):12-18.
[15] 杨特波,王继平,王一,等.基于地质知识库的致密砂岩气藏储层建模——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017,29(4):138-145. YANG T B,WANG J P,WANG Y,et al. Reservoir modeling of tight sandstone gas reservoir based on geological knowledge database:a case from Su X block in Sulige Gas Field. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(4):138-145.
[16] 唐金荣,何宇航.河流相储层单砂体识别与应用.大庆石油地质与开发,2012,31(3):68-72. TANG J R,HE Y H. Recognition of the individual sand body in fluvial facies reservoirs and its application. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2012,31(3):68-72.
[17] 于欢.辫状河储层内部构型精细描述及剩余油分布.大庆石油地质与开发,2015,34(4):73-77. YU H. Fine characterization of the internal configurations for the braided river reservoirs and remained oil. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2015,34(4):73-77.
[18] 庞雄奇,方祖康,陈章明.地震层砂泥含量的地质意义及其应用中需要注意的问题.石油地球物理勘探,1993,28(1):84-90. PANG X Q,FANG Z K,CHEN Z M. Geological meaning of sand or shale content of seismic horizon and points for attention in its application. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,1993,28(1):84-90.
[19] KELLY S. Scaling and hierarchy in braided rivers and their deposits:Examples and implications for reservoir modeling//SAMBROOK S G H,BEST J L,BRISTOW C S,et al. Braided rivers:process,deposits,ecology and management. Oxford:Blackwell Publishing,2006:75-106.
[20] 孙天建,穆龙新,赵国良.砂质辫状河储集层隔夹层类型及其表征方法——以苏丹穆格莱特盆地Hegli油田为例.石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):112-120. SUN T J,MU L X,ZHAO G L. Classification and characterization of barrier-intercalation in sandy braided river reservoirs:Taking Hegli Oilfield of Muglad Basin in Sudan as an example. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(1):112-120.
[21] 杨丽莎,陈彬滔,李顺利,等. 基于成因类型的砂质辫状河泥岩分布模式——以山西大同侏罗系砂质辫状河露头为例.天然气地球科学,2013,24(1):93-98. YANG L S,CHEN B T,LI S L,et al. Pattern of genesis-based mudstone distribution for sandy braided river:a case study braidedriver outcrop,Datong,Shanxi province China. Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(1):93-98.
[22] 兰朝利,何顺利,门成全.利用岩心或露头的交错层组厚度预测辫状河河道带宽度——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田为例. 油气地质与采收率,2005,12(2):16-18. LAN C L,HE S L,MEN C Q. Prediction of braided channel belt width based on cross-stratum sets thickness measurements of cores or outcrops-taking Sulige gas field,Ordos Basin as an example. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2005, 12(2):16-18.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

基于稀疏井网条件下的古辫状河道心滩砂体估算——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例

Estimating method of braided channel bar under sparse well net: a case from Su X block in Sulige Gas Field

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	郑荣臣, 李宏涛, 史云清, 肖开华. 川东北元坝地区三叠系须三段沉积特征及成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 13-26.
[2]	叶涛, 王清斌, 代黎明, 陈容涛, 崔普媛. 台地相碳酸盐岩层序划分新方法——以渤中凹陷奥陶系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 95-103.
[3]	李慧莉, 尤东华, 李建交, 谭广辉, 刘士林. 麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 26-35.
[4]	黄芸, 杨德相, 李玉帮, 胡明毅, 季汉成, 樊杰, 张晓芳, 王元杰. 冀中坳陷杨税务奥陶系深潜山储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 70-80.
[5]	张闻亭, 龙礼文, 肖文华, 魏浩元, 李铁锋, 董震宇. 酒泉盆地青西凹陷窟窿山构造带下沟组沉积特征及储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 186-197.
[6]	彭军, 褚江天, 陈友莲, 文舰, 李亚丁, 邓思思. 四川盆地高石梯—磨溪地区下寒武统沧浪铺组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 12-22.
[7]	戴晓峰, 谢占安, 杜本强, 张明, 唐廷科, 李军, 牟川. 高石梯—磨溪地区灯影组多次波控制因素及预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 89-97.
[8]	庞小军, 王清斌, 解婷, 赵梦, 冯冲. 黄河口凹陷北缘古近系物源及其对优质储层的控制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 1-13.
[9]	郑庆华, 刘乔, 梁秀玲, 张建魁, 张建娜, 刘涛. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长4+5油层组沉积相展布特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 26-35.
[10]	耿涛, 毛小平, 王昊宸, 范晓杰, 吴冲龙. 伦坡拉盆地热演化史及有利区带预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 67-78.
[11]	王桂成, 曹聪. 鄂尔多斯盆地下寺湾油田长3油层组储层特征及控藏机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 1-9.
[12]	任大忠, 张晖, 周然, 王茜, 黄海, 唐胜蓝, 金娜. 塔里木盆地克深地区巴什基奇克组致密砂岩储层敏感性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 27-36.
[13]	孙玉景, 周立发. 鄂尔多斯盆地马五段膏盐岩沉积对天然气成藏的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 67-75.
[14]	仲米虹, 唐武. 前陆盆地隆后坳陷区湖底扇沉积特征及主控因素——以塔北轮南地区三叠系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 18-28.
[15]	田亮, 李佳玲, 焦保雷. 塔河油田12区奥陶系油藏溶洞充填机理及挖潜方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 52-60.