岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 155–164.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2018.01.016

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于稀疏井网条件下的古辫状河道心滩砂体估算——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例

崔连可1, 单敬福2, 李浮萍3, 崔璐1, 种健4   

  1. 1. 中国石化河南油田分公司 采油一厂, 河南 南阳 473000;
    2. 长江大学 油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430100;
    3. 中国石油长庆油田分公司 苏里格气田研究中心, 西安 710018;
    4. 中国石油华北油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 河北 任丘 062550
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-25 修回日期:2017-12-17 出版日期:2018-01-21 发布日期:2018-01-21
  • 第一作者:崔连可(1991-),男,硕士,主要从事油气田开发方面的研究工作。地址:(473000)河南省南阳市桐柏县埠江镇河南油田分公司采油一厂。Email:cuilianke@139.com
  • 通信作者: 单敬福(1977-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事沉积、储层与开发地质学方面的研究工作。地址:(430100)湖北省武汉市长江大学油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室。Email:shanjingfu2003@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“基于物理模拟条件下的点坝侧积体时空分异机理研究”(编号:41372125)资助

Estimating method of braided channel bar under sparse well net: a case from Su X block in Sulige Gas Field

CUI Lianke1, SHAN Jingfu2, LI Fuping3, CUI Lu1, CHONG Jian4   

  1. 1. No.1 Oil Production Plant, Henan Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Nanyang 473000, Henan, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources, Ministry of Education, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China;
    3. Sulige Gas Field Research Center, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710018, China;
    4. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield, Renqiu 062550, Hebei, China
  • Received:2017-10-25 Revised:2017-12-17 Online:2018-01-21 Published:2018-01-21

摘要: 在辫状河沉积环境中,心滩是油气储集的重要场所,如何从已钻井资料中识别心滩并进行平面组合,进而预测河道内部心滩平面展布规律,是正确认识辫状河沉积的基础。针对苏里格气田苏X区块小层划分与对比、沉积微相平面分布等精细地质研究不够深入和单井产量及最终采收率均较低等问题,基于测录井、野外露头和现代卫星图片等资料,在精细划分地层的基础上,利用单期河道砂厚中心连线法、心滩测井相分异法、心滩雷达图和心滩预测技术对研究区进行单期河道和钻遇心滩的识别与刻画、心滩雷达图的绘制以及预测心滩的刻画。结果表明:研究区盒8下1-1和盒8下1-2单层均发育3支河道;河道内心滩分别给定长厚比60∶1~80∶1、宽厚比30∶1~40∶1、长宽比2∶1~3∶1,心滩长度一般为300~1 100 m,宽度一般为150~550 m;单期河道砂厚与心滩在单一河道内发育的个数呈反比。后期加密井钻探结果显示心滩雷达图和心滩预测技术均具有较高的可信度。上述方法可提高心滩钻遇率,便于后期加密井及水平井的大规模部署,有助于提高油气采收率,为相似地层结构和井网密度的工区在研究砂体平面分布和空间叠置规律方面提供参考。

关键词: 沉积相, 颗粒滩, 奥陶系, 塔里木盆地

Abstract: In the braided river sedimentary environment,braided channel bars are more important reservoir sand body for oil and gas accumulation. How to identify braided channel bars by drilling well data,and then combine in plate,moreover,predict the distribution of channel bars,is the foundation for correctly understanding braided river deposits. The fine geological study of fine subzone division and correlation and sedimentary microfacies distribution in Su X block of Sulige Gas Field is insufficient,and single well yield and ultimate recovery are low. Based on the data of logging,field outcrop and modern satellite images,combined with fine stratum classification,sand thickness center line connecting method,braided bar logging phase separation method,radar map of braided bar and braided bar prediction technology,were used to identify and characterize single channel and braided bar,compile the radar map of braided bar and predict the braided bar. The results show that the layer of 1-1 and 1-2 of the lower He 8 member both developed three channels. The braided bar is given a length to thickness ratio of 60:1-80:1,a width to thickness ratio of 30:1-40:1,and a length to width ratio of 2:1-3:1, while the length is 300-1 100 m and the width is 150-550 m. The single channel sand thickness is inversely proportional to the number of braided bar. The results of infill wells show that the radar map of braided bar and prediction technology both have high credibility. The above methods can improve the drilling ratio of braided bar, provide a better condition for the arrangement of infill wells and horizontal wells and improve oil and gas recovery efficiency,and provide reference for the study of sand body distribution and space superposition in the block with similar stratum structure and well density.

Key words: sedimentary facies, grain banks, Ordovician, Tarim Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3
[1] 单敬福,张彬,赵忠军,等.复合辫状河道期次划分方法与沉积演化过程分析——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田西区苏X区块为例.沉积学报,2015,33(4):773-785. SHAN J F,ZHANG B,ZHAO Z J,et al. Single stage and sedimentary evolution process analysis of braided river-a case from Su X block of western Sulige gas field in Ordos Basin. Acta Sediemtologica Sinica,2015,33(4):773-785.
[2] 吴胜和,岳大力,刘建民,等.地下古河道储层构型的层次建模研究.中国科学:D辑地球科学,2008,38(增刊1):111-121. WU S H,YUE D L,LIU J M,et al. Hierarchy modeling of subsurface palaeochannel reservoir architecture. Science China:Series D Earth Sciences,2008,38(Suppl 1):111-121.
[3] 刘琦,孙雷,罗平亚,等.苏里格西区含水气藏合理产能评价方法研究. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2013,35(3):131-136. LIU Q,SUN L,LUO P Y,et al. The research on the proper production capacity evaluations on the west of Sulige gas field. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2013,35(3):131-136.
[4] 何宇航,宋保全,张春生.大庆长垣辫状河砂体物理模拟实验研究与认识.地学前缘,2012,19(2):41-48. HE Y H,SONG B Q,ZHANG C S. A study of braided river sand deposit in Changyuan,Daqing through physical simulation experiments. Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(2):41-48.
[5] 马世忠,孙雨,范广娟,等.地下曲流河道单砂体内部薄夹层建筑结构研究方法.沉积学报,2008,26(4):632-639. MA S Z,SUN Y,FAN G J,et al. The method for studying thin interbed architecture of burial meandering channel sandbody. Acta Sediemtologica Sinica,2008,26(4):632-639.
[6] BEST J L,ASHWORTH P J,BRISTOW C S,et al. Threedimensional sedimentary architecture of a large,mid-channel sand braid bar,Jamuna River,Bangladesh. Journal of Sedimentary Research,2003,73(4):516-530.
[7] 于兴河,马兴祥,穆龙新,等.辫状河储层地质模式及层次界面分析.北京:石油工业出版社,2004:41-59. YU X H,MA X X,MU L X,et al. Analysis of geological model and hierarchical interface of braided river reservoir. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2004:41-59.
[8] 廖保方,张为民,李列,等.辫状河现代沉积研究与相模式——中国永定河剖析.沉积学报,1998,16(1):34-39. LIAO B F,ZHANG W M,LI L,et al. Study on modern deposit of a braided stream and facies model-taking the Yongding river as an example. Acta Sediemtologica Sinica,1998,16(1):34-39.
[9] 董建辉.苏里格地层划分与对比研究.科学技术与工程,2012, 12(14):3443-3445.DONG J H. Stratigraphic division and correlation of Sulige. Science Technology and Engineering,2012,12(14):3443-3445.
[10] 范玲玲,宋荣彩,金文辉,等.鄂尔多斯盆地苏西X井区盒8段砂体发育模式研究.岩性油气藏,2012,24(4):29-33. FAN L L,SONG R C,JIN W H,et al. Study on sand body development model of He 8 member in Suxi X well block of Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2012,24(4):29-33.
[11] 刘建新,雍学善,吴会良,等.苏里格气田盒8段地震多技术储层沉积相研究.岩性油气藏,2007,19(2):80-83. LIU J X,YONG X S,WU H L,et al. Study on sedimentary facies by seismic multiple techniques in the eighth member of Shihezi Formation,Sulige Gas Field. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(2):80-83.
[12] 谢庆宾,谭欣雨,高霞,等.苏里格气田西部主要含气层段储层特征.岩性油气藏,2014,26(4):57-65. XIE Q B,TAN X Y,GAO X,et al. Characteristics of major gasbearing reservoirs in western Sulige Gas Field. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(4):57-65.
[13] 茌卫东.苏里格气田水平井开发分段压裂技术研究.西安:西安石油大学,2013. CHI W D. A study on horizontal well staged fracturing technology in Sulige gas field. Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University,2013.
[14] 张满郎,李熙喆,谷江锐,等.砂体组合的划分及评价——以鄂尔多斯盆地山2段、盒8段为例.岩性油气藏,2009,21(2):12-18. ZHANG M L,LI X Z,GU J R,et al. Division and evaluation of sand body assemblages:an example from Shan 2 and He 8 member of Upper Paleozoic in Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(2):12-18.
[15] 杨特波,王继平,王一,等.基于地质知识库的致密砂岩气藏储层建模——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017,29(4):138-145. YANG T B,WANG J P,WANG Y,et al. Reservoir modeling of tight sandstone gas reservoir based on geological knowledge database:a case from Su X block in Sulige Gas Field. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(4):138-145.
[16] 唐金荣,何宇航.河流相储层单砂体识别与应用.大庆石油地质与开发,2012,31(3):68-72. TANG J R,HE Y H. Recognition of the individual sand body in fluvial facies reservoirs and its application. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2012,31(3):68-72.
[17] 于欢.辫状河储层内部构型精细描述及剩余油分布.大庆石油地质与开发,2015,34(4):73-77. YU H. Fine characterization of the internal configurations for the braided river reservoirs and remained oil. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2015,34(4):73-77.
[18] 庞雄奇,方祖康,陈章明.地震层砂泥含量的地质意义及其应用中需要注意的问题.石油地球物理勘探,1993,28(1):84-90. PANG X Q,FANG Z K,CHEN Z M. Geological meaning of sand or shale content of seismic horizon and points for attention in its application. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,1993,28(1):84-90.
[19] KELLY S. Scaling and hierarchy in braided rivers and their deposits:Examples and implications for reservoir modeling//SAMBROOK S G H,BEST J L,BRISTOW C S,et al. Braided rivers:process,deposits,ecology and management. Oxford:Blackwell Publishing,2006:75-106.
[20] 孙天建,穆龙新,赵国良.砂质辫状河储集层隔夹层类型及其表征方法——以苏丹穆格莱特盆地Hegli油田为例.石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):112-120. SUN T J,MU L X,ZHAO G L. Classification and characterization of barrier-intercalation in sandy braided river reservoirs:Taking Hegli Oilfield of Muglad Basin in Sudan as an example. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(1):112-120.
[21] 杨丽莎,陈彬滔,李顺利,等. 基于成因类型的砂质辫状河泥岩分布模式——以山西大同侏罗系砂质辫状河露头为例.天然气地球科学,2013,24(1):93-98. YANG L S,CHEN B T,LI S L,et al. Pattern of genesis-based mudstone distribution for sandy braided river:a case study braidedriver outcrop,Datong,Shanxi province China. Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(1):93-98.
[22] 兰朝利,何顺利,门成全.利用岩心或露头的交错层组厚度预测辫状河河道带宽度——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田为例. 油气地质与采收率,2005,12(2):16-18. LAN C L,HE S L,MEN C Q. Prediction of braided channel belt width based on cross-stratum sets thickness measurements of cores or outcrops-taking Sulige gas field,Ordos Basin as an example. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2005, 12(2):16-18.
[1] 易珍丽, 石放, 尹太举, 李斌, 李猛, 刘柳, 王铸坤, 余烨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘—哈得地区中生界物源转换及沉积充填响应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 56-66.
[2] 孟庆昊, 张昌民, 张祥辉, 朱锐, 向建波. 塔里木盆地现代分支河流体系形态、分布及其主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 44-56.
[3] 卢科良, 吴康军, 李志军, 孙永河, 徐少华, 梁锋, 刘露, 李爽. 川中古隆起北斜坡寒武系龙王庙组油气成藏特征及演化模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 159-168.
[4] 程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[5] 陈叔阳, 何云峰, 王立鑫, 尚浩杰, 杨昕睿, 尹艳树. 塔里木盆地顺北1号断裂带奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层结构表征及三维地质建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 124-135.
[6] 王天海, 许多年, 吴涛, 关新, 谢再波, 陶辉飞. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组沉积相展布特征及沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 98-110.
[7] 杜江民, 崔子豪, 贾志伟, 张毅, 聂万才, 龙鹏宇, 刘泊远. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区奥陶系马家沟组马五5亚段沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 37-48.
[8] 魏嘉怡, 王红伟, 刘刚, 李涵, 曹茜. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘冲断带石炭系羊虎沟组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 120-130.
[9] 朱秀香, 赵锐, 赵腾. 塔里木盆地顺北1号断裂带走滑分段特征与控储控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 131-138.
[10] 付文俊, 张昌民, 冀东升, 娄林, 刘家乐, 王绪龙. 准噶尔盆地南安集海河剖面中侏罗统头屯河组浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 145-160.
[11] 宋兴国, 陈石, 杨明慧, 谢舟, 康鹏飞, 李婷, 陈九洲, 彭梓俊. 塔里木盆地富满油田F16断裂发育特征及其对油气分布的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 99-109.
[12] 卜旭强, 王来源, 朱莲花, 黄诚, 朱秀香. 塔里木盆地顺北油气田奥陶系断控缝洞型储层特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 152-160.
[13] 倪新锋, 沈安江, 乔占峰, 郑剑锋, 郑兴平, 杨钊. 塔里木盆地奥陶系缝洞型碳酸盐岩岩溶储层成因及勘探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 144-158.
[14] 王亮, 苏树特, 马梓柯, 蒲静, 姚蔺芳, 刘宇, 罗洋. 川中地区寒武系沧浪铺组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 19-31.
[15] 陈中红, 柴智. 原油混合后成熟度参数的差异性及其地质意义——以塔北隆起托甫台地区奥陶系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 38-49.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣,侯中健,王亚辉,王莹,王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才,李晓平,窦天财,吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳,张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯,郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜,秦伟军,郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉,陆正元,袁帅,李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云, 卢渊,伊向艺,张俊良,张锦良,王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .