岩性油气藏 ›› 2015, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 1–5.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2015.05.001

• 油气地质 •    下一篇

单一河口坝砂体规模的定量表征

李少华1,胡晓玲1,王 军2,宋道万2,史敬华2   

  1.  1. 长江大学 地球科学学院,武汉 430100 ; 2. 中国石化胜利油田分公司地质科学研究院,山东 东营 257015
  • 出版日期:2015-09-26 发布日期:2015-09-26
  • 第一作者:李少华( 1972- ),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事储层表征与建模方面的教学与科研工作。 地址:( 430100 )湖北省武汉市蔡甸区大学路 111 号长江大学地球科学学院。 E-mail : 534354156@qq.com 。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金“点坝砂体内部非均质性的层次建模法”(编号: 41272136 )和国家重大科技专项“储层内部结构建模软件研制”(编号: 2011ZX05011-001 )联合资助

Quantitative characterization of single mouth bar

Li Shaohua1, Hu Xiaoling1, Wang Jun2, Song Daowan2, Shi Jinghua2   

  1.  1. School of Geosciences , Yangtze University , Wuhan 430100 , China ; 2. Geology Scientific Research Institute ,Shengli Oilfield Company , Sinopec , Dongying 257015 , Shandong , China
  • Online:2015-09-26 Published:2015-09-26

摘要:

以胜坨油田沙二段 8 砂组为例,综合应用水槽模拟实验和现代沉积的测量结果对辫状河三角洲河口坝内部构型进行了深入分析,并重点对河口坝长宽比定量规模进行了研究。 水槽模拟实验统计表明,模拟的研究区河口坝长 45~210 cm ,宽 30~150 cm ,长度与宽度具有较好的相关性。 现代沉积的测量结果也说明了河口坝的长度与宽度具有较好的相关性。 综合水槽模拟实验与现代沉积测量的结果,建立了研究区单一河口坝长宽比经验公式。 利用该公式可以指导研究区精细河口坝构型解剖,辅助判断单一河口坝边界,为建立三角洲前缘河口坝精细三维地质模型提供了依据。

关键词: 砂岩侵入体, 岩心特征, 古近系, 西湖凹陷

Abstract:

Taking the 8th sand group of the second member of Shahejie Formation in Shengtuo Oilfield as an example, this paper analyzed the configuration of braided river delta mouth bar by using physical simulation experiment and measurement result of modern sedimentation, and studied the ratio of length to width of mouth bar. The results of physical simulation experiment show that the length of mouth bar varies from 45 cm to 210 cm and the width of mouth bar ranges from 30 cm to 150 cm, the ratio of length to width of mouth bar shows some correlation, as the same with the result of modern sedimentation measurement. At last, the empirical formula of the ratio of length to width of single mouth bar was established with combination consideration of physical simulation of sedimentation and measurement result of modern sedimentation. This formula can guide the study of reservoir architecture of mouth bar and the boundary identification of single mouth bar, providing support for establishment of fine 3D model of mouth bar.

Key words: sand injectites, core feature, Paleogene, Xihu Sag

[ 1 ] Allen J R L. Study in fluviatile sedimentation : six cyclothems from the lower Old Red Sandstone Anglo Welsh basin [ J ] . Sedimentology ,1964 , 3 : 163-198.

[ 2 ] Miall A D. Fluvial sedimentology [ M ] . Calgayr , Albetra : Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists , 1977 : 123-128.

[ 3 ] Miall A D. Architectural-element analysis : A new method of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits [ J ] . Earth Science Review , 1985 ,22 : 261-308.

[ 4 ] Dreyer T. Geometry and facies of large-scale flow units in fluvial-dominated fan-delta-front sequences [ J ] . Advance in Reservoir Geology , 1993 , 69 : 135-174.

[ 5 ] 马世忠,杨清彦 . 曲流点坝沉积模式、三维构型及其非均质模型[ J ] . 沉积学报, 2000 , 18 ( 2 ): 241-247.

Ma Shizhong , Yang Qingyan. The depositional model , 3-D architecture and heterogeneous model of point bar in meandering channels [ J ] . Acta Sedimentologica Sinica , 2000 , 18 ( 2 ): 241-247.

[ 6 ] 周银邦,吴胜和,计秉玉,等 . 曲流河储层构型表征研究进展[ J ] .地球科学进展, 2011 , 26 ( 7 ): 695-700.

Zhou Yinbang , Wu Shenghe , Ji Binyu , et al. Research progress on the characterization of fluvial reservoir A rchitecture [ J ] . Advances in Earth Science , 2011 , 26( 7 ): 695-700.

[ 7 ] 潘树新,郑荣才,卫平生,等 . 陆相湖盆块体搬运体的沉积特征、识别标志与形成机制[ J ] . 岩性油气藏, 2013 , 25 ( 2 ): 9-19.

Pan Shuxin , Zheng Rongcai , Wei Pingsheng , et al. Deposition characteristics , recognition mark and form mechanism of mass transport deposits in terrestrial lake Basin [ J ] . Lithologic Reservoirs , 2013 ,25 ( 2 ): 9-19.

[ 8 ] 王建功,王天琦,卫平生,等,大型凹陷湖盆浅水三角洲沉积模式—— — 以松辽盆地北部葡萄花油藏为例[ J ] . 岩性油气藏, 2007 ,19 ( 2 ): 28-34.

Wang Jiangong , Wang Tianqi , Wei Pingsheng , et al. Sedimentary mode of shallow lacustrine delta of large continental basin — An example from Putaohua Formation in northern Songliao Basin [ J ] .Lithologic Reservoirs , 2007 , 19 ( 2 ): 28-34.

[ 9 ] 代黎明,李建平,周心怀,等 . 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[ J ] . 岩性油气藏, 2007 , 19 ( 4 ): 75-81.

Dai Liming , Li Jianping , Zhou Xinhua , et al. Depositional system of the Neogene shallow water delta in Bohai Sea area [ J ] . Lithologic Reservoirs , 2007 , 19 ( 4 ): 75-81.

[ 10 ] 孙春燕,胡明毅,胡忠贵,等 . 松辽盆地兴城地区泉四段浅水三角洲沉积特征[ J ] . 岩性油气藏, 2015 , 27 ( 3 ): 66-74.

Sun Chunyan , Hu Mingyi , Hu Zhonggui , et al. Sedimentary characteristics of shallow water delta of Quan-4 member in Xingcheng area , Songliao Basin [ J ] . Lithologic Reservoirs , 2015 , 27 ( 3 ): 66-74.

[ 11 ] Reynolds A D. Dimensions of paralic sandstone bodies [ J ] . AAPG Bulletin , 1999 , 83 : 211-229.

[ 12 ] Lowry T , Allen M B , Shive P N. Singularity removal : A refinement of resitivity modeling techniques [ J ] . Geophysics , 1989 , 54 ( 6 ):766-774.

[ 13 ] Tye R S. Geomorphology : An approach to determining subsurface reservoir dimensions [ J ] . AAPG Bulletin , 2004 , 88 : 1123-1147.

[ 14 ] Bridge J S , Maekey S D A. Theoretical study of fluvial sandstone body dimensions [ J ] . Spec. Publs. int. Ass. Sediment , 1993 , 15 :213-236.

[ 15 ] Bryant J D , Fint S S. Quantitative clastic reservoir geological modeling [ J ] . Spec. Publs. int. Ass. Sediment , 1993 , 15 : 315-323.

[ 16 ] 张春生,刘忠保,施冬,等 . 三角洲分流河道及河口坝形成过程的物理模拟[ J ] . 地学前缘, 2000 , 7 ( 3 ): 168-175.

Zhang Chunsheng , Liu Zhongbao , Shi Dong , et al. Physical simulation of formation process in distributary channels and debouch bars in delta [ J ] . Earth Science Frontiers , 2000 , 7 ( 3 ): 168-175.

[ 17 ] Coleman J M. Brahmaputra river : Channel processes and sedimentation [ J ] . Sedim-Geaf , 1969 , 3 : 129-239.

[1] 周自强, 朱正平, 潘仁芳, 董於, 金吉能. 基于波形相控反演的致密砂岩储层模拟预测方法——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷南部古近系孔二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[2] 张磊, 李莎, 罗波波, 吕伯强, 谢敏, 陈新平, 陈冬霞, 邓彩云. 东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段超压岩性油气藏成藏机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 57-70.
[3] 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[4] 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157.
[5] 西智博, 廖建平, 高荣锦, 周晓龙, 雷文文. 辽河坳陷陈家断裂带北部构造演化解析及油气成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 127-136.
[6] 方旭庆, 钟骑, 张建国, 李军亮, 孟涛, 姜在兴, 赵海波. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙三下亚段旋回地层学分析及地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 19-30.
[7] 王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169.
[8] 牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
[9] 李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.
[10] 胡望水, 高飞跃, 李明, 郭志杰, 王世超, 李相明, 李圣明, 揭琼. 渤海湾盆地廊固凹陷古近系沙河街组油藏单元精细表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 92-99.
[11] 张振华, 张小军, 钟大康, 苟迎春, 张世铭. 柴达木盆地西北部南翼山地区古近系下干柴沟组上段储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 29-39.
[12] 曾旭, 卞从胜, 沈瑞, 周可佳, 刘伟, 周素彦, 汪晓鸾. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷古近系沙三段页岩油储层非线性渗流特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 40-50.
[13] 应凯莹, 蔡长娥, 梁煜琦, 陈鸿, 尚文亮, 苏桂娇. 伊通盆地岔路河断陷古近系断层的垂向封闭性及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 136-143.
[14] 郑彬, 董翱, 张源智, 张毅, 苏珊, 张士超, 樊津津, 骆垠山. 济阳坳陷渤南洼陷古近系沙河街组流体压力建场过程及其石油地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 59-67.
[15] 完颜泽, 龙国徽, 杨巍, 柴京超, 马新民, 唐丽, 赵健, 李海鹏. 柴达木盆地英雄岭地区古近系油气成藏过程及其演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 94-102.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄思静,黄培培,王庆东,刘昊年,吴 萌,邹明亮. 胶结作用在深埋藏砂岩孔隙保存中的意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 7 -13 .
[2] 刘震, 陈艳鹏, 赵阳,, 郝奇, 许晓明, 常迈. 陆相断陷盆地油气藏形成控制因素及分布规律概述[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 121 -127 .
[3] 丁超,郭兰,闫继福. 子长油田安定地区延长组长6 油层成藏条件分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1): 46 -50 .
[4] 李彦山,张占松,张超谟,陈鹏. 应用压汞资料对长庆地区长6 段储层进行分类研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 91 -93 .
[5] 罗 鹏,李国蓉,施泽进,周大志,汤鸿伟,张德明. 川东南地区茅口组层序地层及沉积相浅析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(2): 74 -78 .
[6] 左国平,屠小龙,夏九峰. 苏北探区火山岩油气藏类型研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(2): 37 -41 .
[7] 王飞宇. 提高热采水平井动用程度的方法与应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(Z1): 100 -103 .
[8] 袁云峰,才业,樊佐春,姜懿洋,秦启荣,蒋庆平. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带石炭系火山岩储层裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(1): 47 -51 .
[9] 袁剑英,付锁堂,曹正林,阎存凤,张水昌,马达德. 柴达木盆地高原复合油气系统多源生烃和复式成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(3): 7 -14 .
[10] 石战战,贺振华,文晓涛,唐湘蓉. 一种基于EMD 和GHT 的储层识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(3): 102 -105 .