一种基于SC-DTW的叠前道集剩余时差校正方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.05.013

岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 113–119.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.05.013

一种基于SC-DTW的叠前道集剩余时差校正方法

石战战¹, 唐湘蓉², 庞溯¹, 池跃龙¹

1. 成都理工大学工程技术学院, 四川乐山 614000;
2. 成都理工大学地球物理学院, 成都 610059

收稿日期:2017-02-16 修回日期:2017-04-06 出版日期:2017-09-21 发布日期:2017-09-21
作者简介:石战战(1985-),男,硕士,讲师,主要从事储层预测方面的科研和教学工作。地址:(614000)四川省乐山市市中区肖坝路222号成都理工大学工程技术学院。Email:shizhanzh@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“孔隙介质低频地震衰减与频散异常的识别机理及应用”（编号：41374134）、“复杂地震信号分数域频谱成像理论及应用研究”（编号：41274127）及四川省教育厅项目“基于时频域波形分类的礁滩储层预测方法研究”（编号：16ZB0410）联合资助

Prestack gather residual moveout correction based on shape context and dynamic time warping

SHI Zhanzhan¹, TANG Xiangrong², PANG Su¹, CHI Yuelong¹

1. Engineering & Technical College of Chengdu University of Technology, Leshan 614000, Sichuan, China;
2. College of Geophysics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China

Received:2017-02-16 Revised:2017-04-06 Online:2017-09-21 Published:2017-09-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 地下介质通常具有各向异性和非均质性，导致常规速度分析及动、静校正难以拉平地震同相轴，常规处理后的地震道集仍然存在剩余时差，这是AVO属性分析和叠前反演常遇到的难题。基于形状上下文（SC）和动态时间规整（DTW），提出了一种新的叠前道集剩余时差校正方法，并对该方法进行数值模拟和实例分析验证。结果表明：基于SC-DTW的叠前道集剩余时差校正方法具有较好的抗噪能力，对地震波形畸变具有较好的鲁棒性，能够有效消除叠前地震道的剩余时差；处理后的地震同相轴波形连续，振幅特征未改变，可以提高AVO属性分析、叠前反演等地震资料处理解释的准确性。该方法利用叠前道集内各地震道波形的相似性，优选出参考道，并在计算时窗内将道集中的每一道都与参考道进行SC-DTW计算，求取其动态规整路径，进行剩余时差校正，因而具有较好的实用性和推广价值。

关键词: 动静态识别, 碳酸盐岩, 储层类型, 奥陶系, 塔里木盆地

Abstract: Prestack reflection events cannot be flatten by conventional velocity analysis and NMO,statics correction, due to anisotropy and heterogeneity of the subsurface media. This is a difficult problem for AVO attribute analysis and prestack inversion. Based on shape context and dynamic time warping(SC-DTW),a new method of prestack residual moveout correction was introduced and verified by numerical simulation(model)and example analysis. The results show that the residual moveout correction method based on SC-DTWprestack gather has better anti-noise capability,better robustness to seismic waveform distortion,and can effectively eliminate the residual moveout of prestack seismic traces. The continuous waveform of the seismic events and the amplitude characteristics are not changed,which can improve the accuracy of seismic data processing and interpretation,such as AVO attribute analysis and prestack inversion. Using waveforms similarity of prestack gathers,the method optimizes for a reference trace,and run SC-DTW calculation of each trace with reference trace in calculation window, to calculate the dynamic warping path and residual moveout correction. The utility model has better practicability and popularization value.

Key words: static and dynamic identification, carbonate, reservoir type, Ordovician, Tarim Basin

中图分类号:

P631.4

石战战, 唐湘蓉, 庞溯, 池跃龙. 一种基于SC-DTW的叠前道集剩余时差校正方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 113–119.

SHI Zhanzhan, TANG Xiangrong, PANG Su, CHI Yuelong. Prestack gather residual moveout correction based on shape context and dynamic time warping[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(5): 113–119.

参考文献

[1] SPRATT S. Effect of normal moveout errors on amplitude versus offset-derived shear reflectivity. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts. New Orleans:SEG,1987.
[2] SWAN H W. Amplitude-versus-offset measurement errors in a finely layered medium. Geophysicists,1991,56(1):41-49.
[3] 曲寿利. AVO分析中的剩余时差校正. 石油地球物理勘探, 1991,26(4):523-528. QU S L. Residual moveout correction in AVO analysis. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,1991,26(4):523-528.
[4] 郭树祥. 分频剩余静校正方法及应用效果分析. 石油地球物理勘探,2001,36(6):735-739. GUO S X. Method of frequency-divisional residual statics and its application.OilGeophysical Prospecting,2001,36(6):735-739.
[5] SWAN H W. Velocities from amplitude variations with offset. Geophysicists,2001,66(6):1735-1743.
[6] 周鹏,刘志斌,张益明,等. 动校剩余时差处理方法及应用. 地球物理学进展,2015,30(5):2349-2353. ZHOU P,LIU Z B,ZHANG Y M,et al. The processing method and application of the residual moveout NMO. Progress in Geophysics, 2015,30(5):2349-2353.
[7] HINKLEY D,BEAR G W,DAWSON C. Prestack gather flattening for AVO. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts. Denver:SEG,2004.
[8] GULUNAY N,GAMAR F,HOEBER H. Robust residual gather flattening. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts. San Antonio:SEG,2007.
[9] SAKOE H,CHIBA S. Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics,Speech,and Signal Processing,1978,26(1):43-49.
[10] SALVADOR S,CHAN P. Fast DTW:toward accurate dynamic time warping in linear time and space. Intelligent Data Analysis, 2007,11(5):561-580.
[11] AL-NAYMAT G,CHAWLAS,TAHERI J. Sparse DTW:a novel approach to speed up dynamic time warping. The 2009 Australasian Data Mining. Melbourne:Australian Computer Society,2009.
[12] ZHANG Z,TANG P,DUAN R B. Dynamic time warping under pointwise shape context. Information Sciences,2015,315(10):88-101.
[13] MORI G,BELONGIE S,MALIK J. Efficient shape matching using shape contexts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,2005,27(11):1832-1837.
[14] QIAN D H,CHEN T S,QIAO H. Background of shape contexts for point matching. Pattern Recognition Letters,2016,84:114-119.
[15] ZINKEA,MAYER D. Iterative multi scale dynamic time warping. Bonn:Universität Bonn,2006.

相关文章 15

[1]	叶涛, 王清斌, 代黎明, 陈容涛, 崔普媛. 台地相碳酸盐岩层序划分新方法——以渤中凹陷奥陶系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 95-103.
[2]	武中原, 张欣, 张春雷, 王海英. 基于LSTM循环神经网络的岩性识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 120-128.
[3]	孙亮, 李保柱, 刘凡. 基于Pollock流线追踪的油藏高效水驱管理方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 169-176.
[4]	李慧莉, 尤东华, 李建交, 谭广辉, 刘士林. 麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 26-35.
[5]	黄芸, 杨德相, 李玉帮, 胡明毅, 季汉成, 樊杰, 张晓芳, 王元杰. 冀中坳陷杨税务奥陶系深潜山储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 70-80.
[6]	杨美华, 钟海全, 李颖川. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏新型油藏生产指示曲线[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 163-170.
[7]	戴晓峰, 谢占安, 杜本强, 张明, 唐廷科, 李军, 牟川. 高石梯—磨溪地区灯影组多次波控制因素及预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 89-97.
[8]	孙予舒, 黄芸, 梁婷, 季汉成, 向鹏飞, 徐新蓉. 基于XGBoost算法的复杂碳酸盐岩岩性测井识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 98-106.
[9]	陈明江, 程亮, 陆涛. Ahdeb油田Khasib油藏孔隙结构及其对注水开发的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 133-143.
[10]	钱真, 李辉, 乔林, 柏森. 碳酸盐岩油藏低矿化度水驱作用机理实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 159-165.
[11]	罗志锋, 黄静云, 何天舒, 韩明哲, 张锦涛. 碳酸盐岩储层酸压裂缝高度延伸规律——以川西栖霞组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 169-176.
[12]	史文洋, 姚约东, 程时清, 顾少华, 石志良. 川西潮坪相裂缝型碳酸盐岩分层酸压井压力动态分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 152-160.
[13]	孙亮, 李勇, 杨菁, 李保柱. 薄层底水碳酸盐岩油藏水平井含水上升模式及优化注水技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 135-144.
[14]	杨雨然, 张亚, 谢忱, 陈聪, 张晓丽, 陈双玲, 高兆龙. 川西北地区中二叠统栖霞组热液作用及其对储层的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 44-53.
[15]	任文博. 流势调控在缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏控水稳油中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 127-134.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

一种基于SC-DTW的叠前道集剩余时差校正方法

Prestack gather residual moveout correction based on shape context and dynamic time warping

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10