岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 115–123.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190213

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

库车坳陷北部阿合组致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素

王华超1, 韩登林1, 欧阳传湘2, 周嘉义1, 王倩倩1, 马力2   

  1. 1. 长江大学 地球科学学院, 武汉 430100;
    2. 长江大学 石油工程学院, 武汉 430100
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-14 修回日期:2019-01-17 出版日期:2019-03-21 发布日期:2019-03-21
  • 通讯作者: 韩登林(1979-)男,博士,教授,主要从事沉积学方面的研究工作。Email:handl@yangtzeu.edu.cn。 E-mail:handl@yangtzeu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王华超(1990-)男,长江大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为储层地质学。地址:(430100)湖北省武汉市蔡甸区长江大学地球科学学院。Email:947369240@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项“山前挠曲盆地深层碎屑岩储层形成的主控机制及规模分布”（编号：2017ZX05008-003-050）资助

Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoir of Ahe Formation in northern Kuqa Depression

WANG Huachao1, HAN Denglin1, OUYANG Chuanxiang2, ZHOU Jiayi1, WANG Qianqian1, MA Li2   

  1. 1. College of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China;
    2. College of Petroleum Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China
  • Received:2018-10-14 Revised:2019-01-17 Online:2019-03-21 Published:2019-03-21

PDF (PC)

252

摘要： 为揭示库车坳陷下侏罗统致密砂岩储层微孔隙的成因和分布规律，通过薄片分析、扫描电镜、X射线衍射、微米CT扫描、激光共聚焦显微观察等观测手段研究北部构造带内阿合组储层特征。结果表明：微孔隙赋存于塑性矿物，其在平面和垂向上的发育明显受层段压实效应制约，构造应力、埋藏深度均是影响平面压实效应的主要因素，泥质含量是影响垂向压实效应的主要因素。阿合组致密砂岩的微孔隙由黏土矿物晶间微孔隙和杂基微弱溶蚀形成的微孔隙组成。受泥质含量、埋藏深度和构造应力的控制，微孔隙主要发育在泥质含量较低的阿合组二段，分布在埋深浅、构造应力较小的依南4井区。这对形成深部致密气藏具有重要意义。

关键词: 致密砂岩, 微孔隙, 主控因素, 阿合组, 库车坳陷

Abstract: In order to reveal the genesis and distribution of micropores in the Lower Jurassic tight sandstone reservoirs in Kuqa Depression,the reservoir characteristics of Ahe Formation in northern tectonic belt were studied by means of thin section analysis,scanning electron microscopy,X-ray diffraction,micro-CT scanning and laser confocal microscopy. The results show that micropores occur in plastic minerals,and their development in the plane and vertical direction is obviously restricted by the compaction effect of intervals. Tectonic stress and burial depth are the main factors affecting the plane compaction effect,and shale content is the main factor affecting the vertical compaction effect. The micropores of the tight sandstone of Ahe Formation are composed of intercrystalline micro-pores of clay minerals and weak dissolved pores in muddy matrix. Controlled by shale content,burial depth and tectonic stress,micropores are mainly developed in the second section of Ahe Formation with low shale content,and distributed in Yinan 4 well area with shallow burial depth and small tectonic stress. This is of great significance for the formation of deep tight gas reservoirs.

Key words: tight sandstone, micropore, main controlling factor, Ahe Formation, Kuqa Depression

中图分类号: 

  • TE357
[1] 钟大康, 朱筱敏, 王红军.中国深层优质碎屑岩储层特征与形成机理分析. 中国科学D辑:地球科学, 2008, 38(增刊1):11-18. ZHONG D K, ZHU X M, WANG H J. Analysis of the characteristics and formation mechanism of deep-quality high-quality clastic reservoirs in China. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 2008, 38(Suppl 1):11-18.
[2] 邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等.常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望:以中国致密油和致密气为例. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2):173-187. ZOU C N, ZHU R K, WU S T, et al. Types, characteristics, genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations:Taking tight oil and tight gas in China as instance. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2):173-187.
[3] 孙龙德, 邹才能, 朱如凯, 等.中国深层油气形成、分布与潜力分析.石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(6):641-649. SUN L D, ZOU C N, ZHU R K, et al. Formation,distribution and potential of deep hydrocarbon in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(6):641-649.
[4] 贾承造, 郑民, 张永峰. 非常规油气地质学重要理论问题.石油学报, 2014, 35(1):1-10. JIA C Z, ZHENG M, ZHANG Y F. Four important theoretical issues of unconventional petroleum geology. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(1):1-10.
[5] 张光亚, 马锋, 梁英波, 等. 全球深层油气勘探领域及理论技术进展.石油学报, 2015, 36(9):1156-1166. ZHANG G Y, MA F, LIANG Y B, et al. Domain and theory technology progress of global deep oil & gas exploration. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(9):1156-1166.
[6] 王招明, 李勇, 谢会文, 等. 库车前陆盆地超深层大油气田形成的地质认识.中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(1):37-43. WANG Z M, LI Y, XIE H W, et al. Geological understanding of the formation of large-scale ultra-deep oil-gas field in the Kuqa foreland basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(1):37-43.
[7] 崔周旗, 李莉, 王宏霞, 等. 霸县凹陷古近系深层砂岩储层特征与岩性油气藏勘探. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2):51-58. CUI Z Q, LI L, WANG H X, et al. Characteristics of deep sandstone reservoirs and lithologic reservoir exploration of Paleogene in Baxian Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(2):51-58.
[8] 刘春, 张荣虎, 张惠良, 等.致密砂岩储层微孔隙成因类型及地质意义:以库车前陆冲断带超深层储层为例. 石油学报, 2017, 38(2):150-159. LIU C, ZHANG R H, ZHANG H L, et al. Genetic types and geological significance of micro pores in tight sandstone reservoirs:a case study of the ultra-deep reservoir in Kuqa foreland thrust belt, NW China. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(2):150-159.
[9] 王猛, 曾明, 陈鸿傲, 等. 储层致密化影响因素分析与有利成岩相带预测:以马岭油田长8油层组砂岩储层为例.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1):59-70. WANG M, ZENG M, CHEN H A, et al. Influencing factors of tight reservoirs and favorable diagenetic facies:a case study of Chang 8 reservoir of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Maling Oilfield, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1):59-70.
[10] 王维斌, 朱静, 马文忠, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地周家湾地区长8致密砂岩储层特征及影响因素.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1):51-58. WANG W B, ZHU J, MA W Z, et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of Chang 8 tight sandstone reservoir of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Zhoujiawan area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1):51-58.
[11] 赵达, 许浩, 汪雷, 等.临兴地区山西组致密砂岩储层特征及成因探讨.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):51-58. ZHAO D, XU H, WANG L, et al. Characteristics and genesis of tight sandstone reservoir of Shanxi Formation in Linxing area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):51-58.
[12] EHRENBERG S N, NADEAU P H. Sandstone vs carbonate petroleum reservoirs:a global perspective on porosity-depth and porosity-permeability relationships. AAPG Bulletin, 2005, 89(4):435-445.
[13] 邹才能, 朱如凯, 白斌, 等.中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值.岩石学报, 2011, 27(6):1857-1864. ZOU C N, ZHU R K, BAI B, et al. First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 27(6):1857-1864.
[14] LOUCKS R G, REED R M, RUPPEL S C, et al. Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(6):1071-1098.
[15] 聂法健, 田巍, 国殿斌, 等. 深层高压低渗透储层应力敏感性研究.断块油气田, 2016, 23(6):788-792. NIE F J, TIAN W, GUO D B, et al. Stress sensitivity of deepburied high pressure low permeability reservoirs. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2016, 23(6):788-792.
[16] 任大忠, 张晖, 周然, 等. 塔里木盆地克深地区巴什基奇克组致密砂岩储层敏感性研究.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6):27-36. REN D Z, ZHANG H, ZHOU R, et al. Sensitivity of tight sandstone reservoir of Bashijiqike Formation in Keshen area, Tarim Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(6):27-36.
[17] 邢恩袁, 庞雄奇, 肖中尧, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷依南2气藏类型的判别. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(6):21-27.XING E Y, PANG X Q, XIAO Z Y, et al. Type discrimination of Yinan 2 gas reservoir in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2011, 35(6):21-27.
[18] 琚岩, 孙雄伟, 刘立炜, 等. 库车坳陷迪北致密砂岩气藏特征. 新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(3):264-267. JU Y, SUN X W, LIU L W, et al. Characteristics of Jurassic tight sandstone gas reservoir in Dibei area of Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(3):264-267.
[19] 刘立炜, 孙雄伟, 赵英杰, 等.库车坳陷迪北致密砂岩气藏油气分布特征及聚集机理. 新疆石油地质,2016, 37(3):257-261. LIU L W, SUN X W, ZHAO Y J, et al Hydrocarbon distribution and accumulation mechanism of Dibei tight sandstone gas reservoir in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(3):257-261.
[20] 邓昆, 周文, 周立发, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系平凉组笔石页岩微孔隙特征及其影响因素.石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(3):378-385. DENG K, ZHOU W, ZHOU L F, et al. Influencing factors of micropores in the graptolite shale of Ordovician Pingliang Formation in Ordos Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(3):378-385.
[21] 李超正, 柳广弟, 曹喆, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7段致密砂岩微孔隙特征. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(7):1235-1247. LI C Z, LIU G D, CAO Z, et al. The study of Chang 7 tight sandstone micro pore characteristics in Longdong area, Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(7):1235-1247.
[22] 张莉, 邹华耀, 郝芳, 等.川东北元坝地区须家河组储层特征与超致密成因探讨.地质学报, 2017, 91(9):2105-2118. ZHANG L, ZOU H Y, HAO F, et al. Characteristics and densification cause and of highly-tight sandstone of the Xujiahe Formation(T3 x2)in the Yuanba area, Northeastern Sichuan Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(9):2105-2118.
[23] 刘卫红, 高先志, 林畅松, 等.库车坳陷阳霞地区下侏罗统阿合组储层特征及储层发育的主控因素. 地质科学, 2017, 52(2):390-406. LIU W H, GAO X Z, LIN C S, et al. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of Lower Jurassic Ahe Formation in Yangxia area, Kuqa Depression. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2017, 52(2):390-406.
[24] 詹彦, 侯贵廷, 孙雄伟, 等.库车坳陷东部侏罗系砂岩构造裂缝定量预测.高校地质学报, 2014, 20(2):294-302. ZHAN Y, HOU G T, SUN X W, et al. Quantitative prediction of tectonic fractures of Jurassic sandstones in the eastern Kuqa Depression. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2014, 20(2):294-302.
[25] 韩登林, 赵睿哲, 李忠, 等.不同动力学机制共同制约下的储层压实效应特征:以塔里木盆地库车坳陷白垩系储层研究为例.地质科学, 2015, 50(1):241-248. HAN D L, ZHAO R Z, LI Z, et al. The characteristic of digenetic compaction induced by multiform geodynamic mechanisms in reservoir:an example from Cretaceous sandstone reservoir in Kuqu Depression, Tarim Basin. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2015, 50(1):241-248.
[26] 刘再振, 刘玉明, 李洋冰, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地神府地区太原组致密砂岩储层特征及成岩演化. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6):51-59. LIU Z Z, LIU Y M, LI Y B, et al. Tight sandstone reservoir characteristics and diagenesis evolution of Taiyuan Formation in Shenmu-Fugu area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(6):51-59.
[27] 寿建峰, 张惠良, 沈扬, 等.中国油气盆地砂岩储层的成岩压实机制分析.岩石学报, 2006, 22(8):2165-2170. SHOU J F, ZHANG H L, SHEN Y, et al. Diagenetic mechanism of sandstone reservoir in China oil and gas bearing basins. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 22(8):2165-2170.
[28] 韩登林, 李雷, 连丽霞, 等. 砂砾岩储集体成岩差异性分析:以玛北斜坡带三叠系百口泉组为例. 地质科学, 2017, 52(2):428-439. HAN D L, LI L, LIAN L X, et al. Differentiation of diagenesis in sandy conglomerate reservoir:a case study from the Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mahu slope area. Junggar Basin. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2017, 52(2):428-439.
[29] 卢华复, 贾东, 陈楚铭, 等.库车新生代构造性质变形和变形时间.地学前缘, 1999, 6(4):215-221. LU H F, JIA D, CHEN C M, et al. Nature and timing of the Kuqa Cenozoic structures. Earth Science Frontiers, 1999, 6(4):215-221.
[1] 张文凯, 施泽进, 田亚铭, 王勇, 胡修权, 李文杰. 川东南志留系小河坝组致密砂岩孔隙类型及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 10-19.
[2] 徐宁宁, 王永诗, 张守鹏, 邱隆伟, 张向津, 林茹. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系盒1段储层特征及成岩圈闭[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 52-62.
[3] 刘桓, 苏勤, 曾华会, 孟会杰, 张小美, 雍运动. 近地表Q补偿技术在川中地区致密气勘探中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 104-112.
[4] 郭永伟, 闫方平, 王晶, 褚会丽, 杨建雷, 陈颖超, 张笑洋. 致密砂岩油藏CO2驱固相沉积规律及其储层伤害特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 153-161.
[5] 魏钦廉, 崔改霞, 刘美荣, 吕玉娟, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部二叠系盒8下段储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 17-25.
[6] 张晓辉, 张娟, 袁京素, 崔小丽, 毛振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长81致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 36-48.
[7] 龙盛芳, 王玉善, 李国良, 段传丽, 邵映明, 何咏梅, 陈凌云, 焦煦. 苏里格气田苏49区块盒8下亚段致密储层非均质性特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 59-69.
[8] 张治恒, 田继军, 韩长城, 张文文, 邓守伟, 孙国祥. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 116-126.
[9] 高计县, 孙文举, 吴鹏, 段长江. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘神府区块上古生界致密砂岩成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 121-130.
[10] 袁纯, 张惠良, 王波. 大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征——以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 73-84.
[11] 张艳, 高世臣, 孟婉莹, 成育红, 蒋思思. 致密砂岩储层AVO正演模拟过程中的不确定性分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 120-128.
[12] 张鹏, 杨巧云, 范宜仁, 张云, 张海涛. 基于Xu-White模型的致密砂岩储层含气性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 138-145.
[13] 侯科锋, 李进步, 张吉, 王龙, 田敏. 苏里格致密砂岩气藏未动用储量评价及开发对策[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 115-125.
[14] 刘俞佐, 石万忠, 刘凯, 王任, 吴睿. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗东部地区上古生界天然气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 56-67.
[15] 程辉, 王付勇, 宰芸, 周树勋. 基于高压压汞和核磁共振的致密砂岩渗透率预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 122-132.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元，赵贤正，金凤鸣，王权，李先平，王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践（IV）——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成，郑荣才，文华国，张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树，张尚峰，尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰，杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦，胡望水，李瑞升，关键，李涛，聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发