三层油藏水驱后转聚驱的试井解释方法

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20180518

岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 146–153.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180518

三层油藏水驱后转聚驱的试井解释方法

曾杨^1,2, 康晓东^1,2, 唐恩高^1,2, 未志杰^1,2, 程时清³

1. 中国海洋石油集团有限公司海洋石油高效开发国家重点实验室, 北京 100028;
2. 中国海洋石油集团有限公司中海油研究总院有限责任公司, 北京 100028;
3. 中国石油大学(北京)石油工程教育部重点实验室, 北京 102249

收稿日期:2018-02-01 修回日期:2018-03-30 出版日期:2018-09-14 发布日期:2018-09-14
作者简介:曾杨(1987-),女,硕士,工程师,主要从事油气田开发及提高采收率方面的研究工作。地址:(100028)北京市朝阳区太阳宫南街6号中国海油大厦B708。Email:zengyang@cnooc.com.cn。
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项“海上油田化学驱油技术”（编号：2016ZX05025-003）和中国海洋石油集团有限公司综合科研“海上多层稠油油藏化学驱交替注入技术研究”（编号：YXKY-2014-ZY-03）联合资助

Well test analysis method for polymer flooding after water flooding in triple-layer reservoir

ZENG Yang^1,2, KANG Xiaodong^1,2, TANG Engao^1,2, WEI Zhijie^1,2, CHENG Shiqing³

1. CNOOC State Key Laboratory of Offshore Oil Exploitation, Beijing 100028, China;
2. CNOOC Research Institute Ltd., Beijing 100028, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering, Ministry of Education, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2018-02-01 Revised:2018-03-30 Online:2018-09-14 Published:2018-09-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前在对于聚合物试井的模型研究中，没有同时考虑多层油藏及非牛顿-牛顿复合油藏2种情况的影响，导致许多海上聚驱油藏实际数据拟合效果不理想。通过考虑海上多层油藏水驱后转聚驱的实际情况，运用数学方法、渗流力学理论，基于严格的数学推导，建立了三层窜流非牛顿-牛顿复合油藏试井解释模型，绘制了井底压力响应特征曲线并对其影响因素进行了讨论，运用实例证明了模型的正确性与实用性。结果表明：三层油藏水驱后转聚驱的试井典型曲线可划分为6个流动段，与一般三层窜流无复合模型的典型曲线特征不同，存在末期复合流段上翘段，聚合物初始浓度对特征曲线影响较小，窜流系数主要影响“凹子”出现的时间，地层系数比和弹性储容比主要影响“凹子”的宽度和深度，复合半径主要影响压力导数曲线上翘段的下移程度。

关键词: 聚合物驱, 三层油藏, 试井, 压力动态, 非牛顿-牛顿

Abstract: In the study of the current model of polymer well testing,the two conditions of multi-layer reservoir and non Newton-Newton composite reservoir were not considered simultaneously,which resulted in the fact that the fitting results of actual data of many offshore polymer flooding reservoirs were not ideal. By taking into account the actual situation of polymer flooding after water flooding in multi-layer offshore reservoirs,a well testing model for polymer flooding after water flooding in triple-layer reservoir was established based on the theory of fluid flow in porous media,type curves were plotted and its influencing factors were discussed by the numerical inversion method and this model was verified by the field examples. The result show that the type curves have six regimes,the typical feature which is different from the triple-layer non composite model is the end-stage upwarp segment,the initial concentration of polymer has little influence on the curve,the crossflow coefficient mainly affects the time of the concave,coefficient ratio and storativity ratio mainly affect the width and depth of the concave,and the composite radius mainly affects the down degree of the upper part of the pressure derivative curve.

Key words: polymer flooding, triple-layered reservoir, well testing, pressure dynamics, non Newton-Newton

中图分类号:

TE353

曾杨, 康晓东, 唐恩高, 未志杰, 程时清. 三层油藏水驱后转聚驱的试井解释方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 146–153.

ZENG Yang, KANG Xiaodong, TANG Engao, WEI Zhijie, CHENG Shiqing. Well test analysis method for polymer flooding after water flooding in triple-layer reservoir[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(5): 146–153.

参考文献

[1] 李传亮. 两种双重介质的对比与分析. 岩性油气藏,2008,20(4):128-131. LI C L. Two types of dual porosity media. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008,20(4):128-131.
[2] 贾永禄,孙高飞,聂仁仕,等. 四重介质油藏渗流模型与试井曲线. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(1):123-127. JIA Y L,SUN G F,NIE R S,et al. Flow model and well test curves for quadruple-media reservoirs. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016,28(1):123-127.
[3] 闫正,郭康良,李彦平,等. 海上干扰试井数值模拟设计及方案优化.岩性油气藏,2015,27(2):98-102. YAN Z,GUO K L,LI Y P,et al. Interference well test with numerical simulation design and program optimization at sea. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(2):98-102.
[4] 廖恒杰,杨志兴,李元生,等.西湖凹陷气藏出水规律及控制因素.岩性油气藏,2017,29(6):135-141. LIAO H J,YANG Z X,LI Y S,et al. Water production laws and controlling factors of gas reservoir in Xihu Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(6):135-141.
[5] 王冬梅,韩大匡,侯维虹. 聚合物驱剖面返转类型及变化规律.大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(4):96-99. WANG D M,HAN D K,HOU W H. Types and changing laws of profile reversal during polymer flooding. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2007,26(4):96-99.
[6] 曹瑞波. 聚合物驱剖面返转现象形成机理实验研究. 油气地质与采收率,2009,16(4):71-74. CAO R B. Laboratory research on section inversion mechanism of polymer flooding. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2009,16(4):71-74.
[7] SPYROU C E,NURAFZA P R,GRINGARTEN A C. Well-head pressure transient analysis. SPE 164871,2013.
[8] LEFKOVITS H C,HAZEBROEK P,ALLEN E E,et al. A study of the behavior of bounded reservoirs composed of stratified layers. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1961,1(1):43-58.
[9] KUCULK F,SHAH P C,AYESTARAN L. Application of multilayer testing and analysis:a field case. SPE 15419,1986.
[10] 贾永禄.具有窜流的双层油气藏井底压力动态模型.天然气工业,1997,17(1):52-54. JIA Y L. Oil and gas reservoirs model for two layers channeling and dynamic monitor down hole pressure. Natural Gas Industry,1997,17(1):52-54.
[11] 吴洪彪,佟斯琴,兰丽凤.考虑层间窜流的多层多相数值试井方法研究.大庆石油地质与开发,2003,22(6):40-44.WU H B,DONG S Q,LAN L F. study on multi-layer and multiphase numerical well testing method for inter-layered channeling, Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2003, 22(6):40-44.
[12] 霍进,贾永禄,王海涛,等.多层窜流油气藏模型及井底压力动态.油气井测试,2006,15(2):1-4. HUO J,JIA Y L,WANG H T,et al. Oil and gas reservoirs model for multilayer channeling and dynamic monitor down hole pressure. Well Testing,2006,15(2):1-4.
[13] IKOKU C U,RAMEY H J. Transient flow of non-Newtonian power law fluids in porous media. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1979,19(3):164-174.
[14] LUND O,IKOKU C U. Pressure transient behavior of nonNewtonian/Newtonian fluid composite reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1981,21(2):271-280.
[15] 刘振宇,翟云芳,卓兴家,等.非牛顿流体在多孔介质中的非稳态流动. 大庆石油学院学报,1995,19(4):18-21. LIU Z Y,ZHAI Y F,ZHUO X J,et al. Studies on transient flow of non-newtonian fluids through porous media. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,1995,19(4):18-21.
[16] 宋考平,王雷,计秉玉.非牛顿-牛顿复合油藏渗流试井解释方法. 石油学报,1996,17(1):82-86. SONG K P,WANG L,JI B Y. Well test analysis of a compound reservoir with non-newtonian and Newtonian fluid flow. Acta Petrolei Sinica,1996,17(1):82-86.
[17] 宋考平,祝俊峰,刘泽俊.多区复合油藏非牛顿幂律流体试井解释. 石油学报,1997,18(2):78-83. SONG K P,ZHU J F,LIU Z J. Well test analysis for a compound reservoir with non-newtonian power law fluids flow. Acta Petrolei Sinica,1997,18(2):78-83.
[18] 张贤松,程时清,唐恩高,等. 聚合物驱非牛顿/牛顿双区试井模型压力分析. 油气井测试,2013,22(6):1-5. ZHANG X S,CHENG S Q,TANG E G,et al. Well test model of the pressure analysis of dual zone of non newtonian/newton with polymer. Well Testing,2013,22(6):1-5.
[19] 程时清,聂向荣.聚合物驱复合油藏试井模型与典型曲线.华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,40(4):110-113. CHENG S Q,NIE X R. Well test model and type curves of composite reservoir with polymer flooding. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition),2012,40(4):110-113.
[20] 郭辉,程时清,于海洋,等. 聚合物驱复合模型试井分析方法. 断块油气田,2014,21(4):504-508. GUO H,CHENG S Q,YU H Y,et al. Well test analysis method of composite model by polymer flooding. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2014,21(4):504-508.
[21] 朱常玉,程时清,唐恩高,等. 聚合物驱三区复合模型试井分析方法. 大庆石油地质与开发,2016,35(3):106-110. ZHU C Y,CHENG S Q,TANG E G,et al. Well-test analyzing method with three-zone composite model for the polymer flooding. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2016,35(3):106-110.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

三层油藏水驱后转聚驱的试井解释方法

Well test analysis method for polymer flooding after water flooding in triple-layer reservoir

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	史文洋, 程时清, 石志良, 张城玮, 李虹, 屠坤, 张郁哲. 纵向组合边界储层合采井压力响应特征及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 156-165.
[2]	崔永正, 姜瑞忠, 郜益华, 乔欣, 王琼. 空间变导流能力压裂井CO₂驱试井分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 172-180.
[3]	史文洋, 姚约东, 程时清, 顾少华, 石志良. 川西潮坪相裂缝型碳酸盐岩分层酸压井压力动态分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 152-160.
[4]	徐有杰, 刘启国, 王瑞, 刘义成. 复合油藏压裂水平井复杂裂缝分布压力动态特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 161-168.
[5]	谢晓庆. 聚合物驱注采参数无梯度优化新算法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 139-146.
[6]	李继庆, 刘曰武, 黄灿, 高大鹏. 页岩气水平井试井模型及井间干扰特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 138-144.
[7]	姜瑞忠, 沈泽阳, 崔永正, 张福蕾, 张春光, 原建伟. 双重介质低渗油藏斜井压力动态特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 131-137.
[8]	印森林, 陈恭洋, 陈玉琨, 吴小军. 砂砾岩储层孔隙结构模态控制下的剩余油分布——以克拉玛依油田七东1区克下组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 91-102.
[9]	李友全, 韩秀虹, 阎燕, 张德志, 周志为, 孟凡坤. 低渗透油藏CO₂吞吐压力响应曲线分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6): 119-127.
[10]	李友全，孟凡坤，阎燕，韩凤蕊，于伟杰，周诗雨. 考虑流体非均质性的低渗透油藏CO₂驱试井分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4): 106-112.
[11]	贾永禄，孙高飞,聂仁仕，李建明,李海科. 四重介质油藏渗流模型与试井曲线[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1): 123-127.
[12]	闫正和，郭康良，李彦平,成楚传，杨勇，刘远志. 海上干扰试井数值模拟设计及方案优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(2): 98-102.
[13]	周庆. 基于灰色主成分的聚合物驱操作成本预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(5): 116-119.
[14]	章威，喻高明，胡海霞，石立华，张昕. 含水率曲线对聚合物驱特征参数的敏感性分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(1): 125-128.
[15]	张云杰，吴云利. 三塘湖盆地低渗透岩性气藏产能综合评价研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(Z1): 96-99.