岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 154–160.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180519

• 石油工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

泡沫混排携砂解堵机理及影响因素

景紫岩1, 张佳2, 李国斌1, 竺彪3, 韩国庆2, 刘双双4   

  1. 1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院 西北分院, 兰州 730020;
    2. 中国石油大学(北京)石油与天然气学院, 北京 102249;
    3. 中海油田服务股份有限公司 生产事业部, 天津 300450;
    4. 斯伦贝谢(北京)技术公司, 北京 100084
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-20 修回日期:2018-05-19 出版日期:2018-09-14 发布日期:2018-09-14
  • 作者简介:景紫岩(1988-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事开发地质及油藏工程等方面的研究工作。地址:(730020))甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号。Email:jingziyan@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项“渤海油田泡沫混排增产工艺研究”（编号：2011ZX05014-004）资助

Mechanism and influencing factors of foam mixed flowback of sand production

JING Ziyan1, ZHANG Jia2, LI Guobin1, ZHU Biao3, HAN Guoqing2, LIU Shuangshuang4   

  1. 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest, Lanzhou 730020, China;
    2. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
    3. Production Optimization, China Oilfield Services Limited., Tianjin 300450, China;
    4. Schlumberger(Beijing), Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2018-03-20 Revised:2018-05-19 Online:2018-09-14 Published:2018-09-14

PDF (PC)

469

摘要： 随着油田采出程度的提高，油藏近井地带堵塞问题愈加突出，为了消除堵塞、增强近井地带流通能力，提高采收率则成为高效开发的关键问题。根据泡沫混排技术的特点，在对其机理进行深入研究的基础上，设计泡沫混排携砂模拟实验，并对泡沫混排携砂影响因素进行分析。结果表明：气液比、裂缝、孔隙度、放喷压差是影响泡沫携砂能力及细粉砂排出的主要因素。该研究成果可为完善泡沫混排理论模型和实际施工提供很好的理论及技术指导，有助于提高油田单井采收率。

关键词: 泡沫混排, 机理研究, 模拟实验, 影响因素, 采收率

Abstract: With the increase of oil recovery,wellbore blockage in sandstone reservoir is becoming more and more serious. How to remove blockage and increase output has become a key issue of efficient development. From the angle of improving the permeability of oil layer to improve the production,many countries have generally adopted the methods of oil layer acidification and hydraulic fracturing to increase the oil recovery rate,but it also brings many negative problems,such as reservoir damage. Based on the mechanism of foam temporary support,state equation was used to deduce the change equation of formation pressure under the condition of foam compressibility,and study the influence of the main formation conditions and construction parameters under the condition of foam compressi-bility by combining the physical simulation experiment. The results show that gas liquid ratio, fracture,porosity and pressure drop are the main factors that affect the sand carrying capacity and the discharge of fine sand. This study can provide a theoretical and technical guidance for improving foam mixed flowback theoretical model and practical construction,and can help to improve single well recovery.

Key words: foam mixed flowback, mechanism research, simulation experiment, influencing factors, recovery ratio

中图分类号: 

  • TE358.1
[1] 张保康,徐国瑞,铁磊磊,等. "堵水+调剖"工艺参数优化和油藏适应性评价——以渤海SZ36-1油田为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017,29(5):155-161. ZHANG B K,XU G R,TIE L L,et al. Optimization of technological parameters and evaluation of reservoir adaptation by water plugging and profile control:a case from Bohai SZ36-1 oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(5):155-161.
[2] 杨红,王宏. 油藏CO2驱提高采收率适宜性评价. 岩性油气藏,2017,29(3):140-146. YANG H,WANG H. Suitability evaluation of enhanced oil recovery by CO2 flooding. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(3):140-146.
[3] PRICE B P,GOTHARD B. Foam assisted lift-importance of selection and application. SPE 106465,2007.
[4] YANG J,SIDDIQUI S. The use of foam to improve liquid lifting from low-pressure gas wells. Technical Meeting/Petroleum Conference of The South Saskatchewan Section,Regina Petroleum Society of Canada,1999.
[5] 崔桂胜,田延喜,樊娜. 泡沫混排解堵技术在孤北21区块的研究和应用.内江科技,2013(1):101-102. CUI G S,TIAN Y X,FAN N. Research and application of foam mixing and plugging technology in Gubei 21 block. Neijiang Science and Technology,2013(1):101-102.
[6] 曹小朋. 泡沫混排解堵的理论研究及应用.北京:中国石油大学(北京),2008. CAO X P. Theoretical study and application of foam plug removal technology. Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing),2008.
[7] 李兆敏,王冠华,曹小朋.泡沫混排解堵技术研究与应用.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2010,32(2):178-181. LI Z M,WANG G H,CAO X P. Research and application of foam mixing and plugging technology. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2010,32(2):178-181.
[8] 王飞,李兆敏,李松岩,等.泡沫混排解堵数学模型及数值模拟.计算物理,2015,32(1):58-64. WANG F,LI Z M,LI S Y,et al. Mathematical model and numerical simulation of foam plug removal. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics,2015,32(1):58-64.
[9] EVREN M,OZBAYOGLU,STEFAN Z,et al. Cuttings transport with foam in horizontal & highly-inclined wellbores,SPE 79856,2003.
[10] 杨肖曦,李松岩,林日亿,等. 泡沫流体携砂能力的数值模拟. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(3):89-92. YANG X X,LI S Y,LIN R Y,et a1.Numerical simulation for prop-carrying capacity of foam fluid. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2006,30(3):89-92.
[11] 李兆敏,李松岩,尚朝辉,等. 流速和环空偏心对泡沫携砂能力的影响数值模拟. 石油钻采工艺,2007,29(3):97-100. LI Z M,LI S Y,SHANG Z H,et al. Numerical simulation of the influence of velocity and annular eccentricity on the sand carrying capacity of foam. Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2007,29(3):97-100.
[12] 孙茂盛. 泡沫流体冲砂洗井数值模拟研究及应用.北京:中国石油大学(北京),2007. SUN M S. Study on horizontal well sand-flushing with foam fluid. Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing),2007.
[13] SAINTPERE S,MARCILAT Y,BRUNI F,et al. Hole cleaning capabilities of drilling foams compared to conventional fluids. SPE 63049,2000.
[14] MARTINS A L,LOURENCO A M F. Foam property requirements for proper hole cleaning while drilling horizontal wells in underbalanced conditions. SPE 64382,2001.
[15] 范学平,徐向荣. 地应力对岩心渗透率伤害实验及机理分析. 石油勘探与开发,2002,29(2):117-119. FAN X P,XU X R. Experimental and mechanism research about permeability damage with the change of stress. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2002,29(2):117-119.
[16] OZBAYOGLU M E,KURU E,MISKA S Z,et al. Cuttings transport with foam in horizontal and highly inclined wellbores. SPE 79856,2003.
[17] 梅海燕,张茂林,任敏红,等.气驱起泡剂综合性能评价. 断块油气田,2006,13(1):26-28. MEI H Y,ZHANG M L,REN M H,et al. Comprehensive performance evaluation of gas drive foaming agent. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2006,13(1):26-28.
[18] 郑力军,张涛,王兴宏,等.氮气泡沫驱油用起泡剂的筛选与评价.石油与天然气化工,2011,40(6):607-609. ZHENG L J,ZHANG T,WANG X H,et al. Screening and evaluation of foaming agent for nitrogen foam flooding. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas,2011,40(6):607-609.
[19] 杜立智,蔡玲玲,郑建辉,等.用混排工艺清洗注水管网.油气田地面工程,2011,30(1):60-61. DU L Z,CAI L L,ZHENG J H,et al. Cleaning water injection pipe network by mixing process. Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering,2011,30(1):60-61.
[20] 皮彦夫.石英砂环氧树脂胶结人造岩心的技术与应用.科学技术与工程,2010,10(28):6998-7000. PI Y F. Technology and application of making artificial cores by the cementation of quartzite and colophony. Science Technology and Engineering,2010,10(28):6998-7000.
[21] 尹遵素. 人造砂岩的制备(一种环氧树脂方法)及其物理性质.江汉石油译丛,1990,18(1):15-18. YIN Z S. The manufacture(epoxy method) and physical properties of artificial rock sample. Jianghan Petroleum Renditions, 1990,18(1):15-18.
[22] 卢祥国,高振环,闫文华. 人造岩心渗透率影响因素试验研究.大庆石油地质与开发,1994,13(4):53-55. LU X G,GAO Z H,YAN W H. Study on the development of man-made core and the influencing factors of permeability. Petroleum Geology and development in Daqing,1994,13(4):53-55.
[23] 李芳芳,杨胜来,高旺来,等.大尺寸石英砂环氧树脂胶结人造岩心制备技术研究及应用.科学技术与工程,2013,13(3):685-689. LI F F,YANG S L,GAO W L,et al. The manufacturing methods of large size heterogeneity artificial cores. Science Technology and Engineering,2013,13(3):685-689.
[24] 杨筱璧.泡沫排水起泡剂室内实验优选.特种油气藏,2009, 16(2):70-71. YANG X B. Indoor experiment optimization of foam drainage agent. Special oil and Gas Reservoirs,2009,16(2):70-71.
[25] 梁万林.人造岩心制备技术研究.石油仪器,2008,22(2):72-76. LIANG W L. Research on artificial core preparation technology. Petroleum Instruments,2008,22(2):72-76.
[1] 严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[2] 黄芸, 杨德相, 李玉帮, 胡明毅, 季汉成, 樊杰, 张晓芳, 王元杰. 冀中坳陷杨税务奥陶系深潜山储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 70-80.
[3] 孙会珠, 朱玉双, 魏勇, 高媛. CO2驱酸化溶蚀作用对原油采收率的影响机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 136-142.
[4] 钱真, 李辉, 乔林, 柏森. 碳酸盐岩油藏低矿化度水驱作用机理实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 159-165.
[5] 黄广庆. 离子组成及矿化度对低矿化度水驱采收率的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 129-133.
[6] 刘秀婵, 陈西泮, 刘伟, 王霞. 致密砂岩油藏动态渗吸驱油效果影响因素及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 114-120.
[7] 韩培慧, 闫坤, 曹瑞波, 高淑玲, 佟卉. 聚驱后油层提高采收率驱油方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 143-150.
[8] 苑伯超, 肖文华, 魏浩元, 张楠, 邓毅林, 张光伟. 酒泉盆地鸭儿峡地区白垩系下沟组砂砾岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 61-70.
[9] 李闽, 王浩, 陈猛. 致密砂岩储层可动流体分布及影响因素研究——以吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 140-149.
[10] 杨红, 王宏, 南宇峰, 屈亚宁, 梁凯强, 江绍静. 油藏CO2驱油提高采收率适宜性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 140-146.
[11] 刘晨, 王凯, 王业飞, 周文胜. 针对A油田的抗温、抗盐聚合物/表面活性剂二元复合驱油体系研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 152-158.
[12] 崔周旗, 李莉, 王宏霞, 王元杰, 郭柳汐, 侯凤梅. 霸县凹陷古近系深层砂岩储层特征与岩性油气藏勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 51-58.
[13] 王维斌, 朱静, 马文忠, 冯顺彦, 刘艳妮, 赵静. 鄂尔多斯盆地周家湾地区长8致密砂岩储层特征及影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1): 51-58.
[14] 寇 雨，周文，赵毅楠，陈文玲，李娜，徐 浩. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7段陆相页岩吸附特性及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(6): 52-57.
[15] 李 可，王兴志，张馨艺，要继超，吴清民. 四川盆地东部下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层特征及影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5): 52-58.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨午阳, 杨文采, 刘全新, 王西文. 三维F-X域粘弹性波动方程保幅偏移方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 86 -91 .
[2] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[3] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[4] 张娣，侯中健，王亚辉，王莹，王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[5] 孙洪斌，张凤莲. 断陷盆地优质储层的成因———以辽河坳陷古近系沙河街组储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1): 51 -54 .
[6] 樊怀才，李晓平，窦天财，吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[7] 梁晓伟，韩永林，王海红，王成玉，牛小兵，辛红刚. 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区上三叠统延长组裂缝特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 49 -53 .
[8] 田淑芳，张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[9] 杨凯，郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[10] 翟中喜，秦伟军，郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发