岩性油气藏 ›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 86–94.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2016.03.012

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

中非 BG 盆地 BN 区块下白垩统湖底扇沉积特征

欧阳雪琪1,王 亮2,刘 峰2,郑荣才1,任 伟1   

  1. 1. 成都理工大学 沉积地质研究院,成都 610059 ;2. 中国石油玉门油田分公司 勘探开发研究院,甘肃 酒泉 735019
  • 出版日期:2016-05-20 发布日期:2016-05-20
  • 作者简介:欧阳雪琪( 1991- ),女,成都理工大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为储层地质学。 地址:( 610059 )四川省成都市二仙桥东三路 1 号成都理工大学沉积地质研究院。 E-mail:1315185568@qq.com
  • 基金资助:

    中国石油天然气集团公司研究课题“海外油气田勘探与开发技术研究”(编号: Y2013JF8-02 )资助

Sedimentary characteristics of Lower Cretaceous sublacustrine fan in BN block of BG Basin, Central Africa

Ouyang Xueqi1, Wang Liang2, L iu Feng2, Zheng Rongcai1, Ren Wei1   

  1. 1. Institute of Sendimentary Geology ,Chengdu University of Technology ,Chengdu 610059 ,China ;2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development ,PetroChina Yumen Oilfield Company ,Jiuquan 735019 ,Gansu ,China
  • Online:2016-05-20 Published:2016-05-20

摘要:

湖底扇砂体是较为有利的油气储集体,深入研究其沉积特征对油气勘探具有重要意义。 以中非 BG盆地 BN 区块下白垩统 P 组为例,在沉积岩石学及层序地层学理论基础上,对该组岩心的沉积构造、测井曲线组合形态和地震剖面响应特征进行分析,并对区域地质特征进行研究。 结果表明:中非 BG 盆地BN 区块下白垩统 P 组属于湖底扇沉积,自下而上表现为正旋回沉积序列,一般发育内扇、中扇和外扇等3 种亚相,以及分支水道、水道侧溢天然堤与无水道前缘席状砂等微相类型; P 组湖底扇砂体受重力流作用控制,主要沿北东—南西向延伸,总体呈扇形展布,其中,中扇分支水道的砂体顶、底常被灰黑色泥岩包围,具备较好的油气富集条件;湖底扇的物源主要来自盆地东北部,于盆缘先形成较大规模的扇三角洲沉积体系,后以浊流的形式被搬运至前三角洲或更远的深水湖区,最终形成湖底扇沉积体系。 P 组有利储层主要分布于盆地北部陡坡带断层下降盘一侧湖底扇的内扇水道和中扇分支水道砂体中。

关键词: 岩石, 地层, 孔隙度, 地震, 压缩系数, 波速, 介质

Abstract: Sublacustrine fan sand bodies are favorable oil and gas reservoirs, so the study on its sedimentary characteristics has important guiding significance for hydrocarbon exploration. Taking the Lower Cretaceous P Formation in BN block of BG Basin as an example, based on the theories of sedimentary petrology and sequence stratigraphy, this paper analyzed the sedimentary structure of cores, well logging curve combination forms and seismic response characteristics, and studied the regional geological features. The results show that sublacustrine fan is developed in the study area, showing positive cycle sedimentary sequence from bottom to top, and it can be divided into inner-fan,middle-fan and outer-fan sub-facies, which can be subdivided into micro-facies such as branch channel, channel edge natural levee and front sheet sand without channel. The sublacustrine fan sand bodies of P Formation are controlled by gravity flow, and they distributed along the NE-SW with fan shape. The sand bodies at the top and bottom of the branch channel of middle-fan are often sealed by dark-gray mudstones, with good oil and gas accumulation conditions. The sources of the sublacustrine fan mainly came from the northeastern fault basin, first formed large-scale fan delta depositional system in the margin of basin, then were transported to the prodelta or the farther deep lakein the form of turbidity current, and formed sublacustrine fan depositional system eventually. Favorable reservoirs of P Formation are mainly distributed in channel sand bodies of inner-fan and branch channel sandstones of middle-fan on one side of the hanging wall of fault in the northern basin.

Key words: rock, formation, porosity, seism, compressibility, wave velocity, media

[1]郑荣才,郑哲,高博禹,等.珠江口盆地白云凹陷珠江组海底扇深水重力流沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏,2013,25(2):1-8.

Zheng Rongcai,Zheng Zhe,Gao Boyu,et al. Sedimentary features of the gravity flows in submarine fan of Zhujiang Formation in Baiyun Sag,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(2):1-8.

[2]蔡希源,辛仁臣.松辽坳陷深水湖盆层序构成模式对岩性圈闭分布的控制[J].石油学报,2004,25(5):6-10.

Cai Xiyuan,Xin Renchen. Architectural model of sequence stratigraphy controlling the distribution of litho-trap in deep-water lake of Songliao depressive basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2004,25(5):6-10.

[3]张鹏飞,陈世悦,张明军,等.沾化凹陷东营组三段储集层特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2007,34(3):323-327.

Zhang Pengfei,Chen Shiyue,Zhang Mingjun,et al. Reservoir characteristics of Member 3 of Dongying Formation in Zhanhua Sag [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2007,34(3):323-327.


[4]陈广坡,王天琦,李林波,等.箕状断陷湖盆湖底扇特征及油气勘探———以二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷腾格尔组二段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(1):63-69.


Che n Guangpo,Wang Tianqi,Li Linbo,et al. Characteristics of sublacustrine fan in half-graben rift lake basin and its petroleum prospecting:Case study on the second member of Tenggeer Formation,Saihantala Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(1):63-69.

[5]李云,郑荣才,高博禹,等.深水扇沉积研究现状和展望———以珠江口盆地白云凹陷珠江深水扇系统为例[J].地质论评,2010,56(4):549-560;



Li Yun,Zheng Rongcai,Gao Boyu,et al. Reviews and Prospects on submarine fan deposition—A case study of Zhujiang submarine fan system in Baiyun Depression,Pearl River Mouth Basin [J].Geological Review,2010,56(4):549-560.


[6]窦立荣,肖坤叶,胡勇,等.乍得 Bongor 盆地石油地质特征及成藏模式[J].石油学报,2011,32(3):379-386.

Dou Lirong,Xiao Kunye,Hu Yong,et al. Petroleum geology and a model of hydrocarbon accumulations in the Bongor Basin,the Republic of Chad[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(3):379-386.
[7]赵健,肖坤叶,童晓光,等.乍得 Bongor 盆地构造反转的油气地质意义[J].地质科技情报,2013,32(2):105-111.

Zhao Jian,Xiao Kunye,Tong Xiaoguang,et al. Tectonic inversion and its significances to the petroleum geology of Bongor Basin,Chad [J]. Geological Science and Technology Information,2013,32(2): 105-111.
[8]童晓光,窦立荣,田作基,等.苏丹穆格莱特盆地的地质模式和成藏模式[J].石油学报,2004,25(1):19-24.

Tong Xiaoguang,Dou Lirong,Tian Zuoji,et al. Geological mode and hydrocarbon accumulation mode in Muglad passive rift Basin of Sudan[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2004,25(1):19-24.
[9]童晓光,徐志强,史卜庆,等.苏丹迈卢特盆地石油地质特征及成藏模式[J].石油学报,2006,27(2):1-5.

Tong Xiaoguang,Xu Zhiqiang,Shi Buqing,et al. Petroleum geologic property and reservoir-forming pattern of Melut Basin in Sudan[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2006,27(2):1-5.
[10]窦立荣,潘校华,田作基,等.苏丹裂谷盆地油气藏的形成与分布———兼与中国东部裂谷盆地对比分析[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(3):255-261.

Dou Lirong,Pan Xiaohua,Tian Zuoji,et al. Hydrocarbon formation and distribution of rift basins in Sudan—A comparative analysis of them with rift basins in East China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2006,33(3):255-261.
[11]窦立荣. 苏丹迈努特盆地油气成藏机理和成藏模式[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2005,24(1):50-57.

Dou Lirong. Formation mechanism and model of oil and gas accumulations in the Melut Basin,Sudan[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry,2005,24(1):50-57.
[12]朱筱敏.沉积岩石学[M].第 4 版.北京:石油工业出版社,2008:80-95.

Zhu Xiaomin. Sedimentary Petrology [M]. 4th ed. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2008:80-95.
[13]赵澄林,朱筱敏.沉积岩石学[M].第 3 版.北京:石油工业出版社,2001:311-324.
Zhao Chenglin,Zhu Xiaomin. Sedimentary Petrology[M]. 3rd ed.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2001:311-324.


[14]袁静,杜玉民,李云南.惠民凹陷古近系碎屑岩主要沉积环境粒度概率累积曲线特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):103-106.


Yuan Jing,Du Yumin,Li Yunnan. Probability cumulative grain size curves in terrigenous depositional environments of the Paleogene in Huimin Sag[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003, 30(3):103-106.
[15]王建功,王天琦,张顺,等.松辽坳陷盆地水侵期湖底扇沉积特征及地球物理响应[J].石油学报,2009,30(3):361-366.

Wang Jiangong,Wang Tianqi,Zhang Shun,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and geophysical response of sublacustrine fan during transgress period in Songliao Basin [J]. Acta petrolei Sinica,2009, 30(3):361-366.
[16]张庆石,张革,陈彬滔,等.松辽盆地坳陷期湖底扇沉积特征与分布规律———以英台地区青山口组为例[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(3):318-325.

Zhang Qingshi,Zhang Ge,Chen Bintao,et al. Deposition characteristics and distribution pattern of sublaucustrine fan in Qingshankou Formation. Songliao Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014,25(3):318-325.
[17]卫平生,潘树新,王建功,等.湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究———论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(1):27-31.

Wei Pingsheng,Pan Shuxin,Wang Jiangong,et al. Study of the relationship between lithostratigraphic reservoirs and lakeshore line—Introduction on lakeshore line controlling oil/gas reservoirs in sag basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(1):27-31.
[18]石雪峰,杜海峰.姬塬地区长 3—长 4+5 油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏,2008,20(1):59-63.

Shi Xuefeng,Du Haifeng. Study on the sedimentary facies of the member 3 and 4+5 of Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2008,20(1):59-63.













[19]马洪涛,蔡玥,付国民.塔河油田 AT1 井区中三叠统中油组湖底扇沉积特征研究[J].岩性油气藏,2010,22(3):53-58.


Ma Hongtao,Cai Yue,Fu Guomin. Sedimentary characteristics of sublacustrine fan of Middle Triassic Zhongyou Formation in AT1 area,Tahe Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2010,22(3):53-58.
[20]郑荣才,王海红,韩永林,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长 6 段沉积相特征和砂体展布[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(3):21-26.

Zheng Rongcai,Wang Haihong,Han Yonglin,et al. Sedimentary facies characteristics and sandbody distribution of Chang 6 member in Jiyuan area of Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2008,20(3):21-26.
[21]鄢继华,陈世悦,宋国奇,等.三角洲前缘滑塌浊积岩形成过程初探[J].沉积学报,2004,24(4):573-578.

Yan Jihua,Chen Shiyue,Song Guoqi,et al. Preliminary study on the formation of fluxoturbidite in front of delta[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2004,24(4):573-578.
[22]操应长,刘晖.湖盆三角洲沉积坡度带特征及其与滑塌浊积岩分布关系的初步探讨[J].地质论评,2007,53(4):454-459.






 
[1] 杨荣军, 彭平, 张静, 叶茂, 文华国. 四川盆地奉节地区上古生界古隆起特征及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 1-9.
[2] 马乔雨, 张欣, 张春雷, 周恒, 武中原. 基于一维卷积神经网络的横波速度预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 111-120.
[3] 刘化清, 冯明, 郭精义, 潘树新, 李海亮, 洪忠, 梁苏娟, 刘彩燕, 徐云泽. 坳陷湖盆斜坡区深水重力流水道地震响应及沉积特征——以松辽盆地LHP地区嫩江组一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 1-12.
[4] 苏敏, 吴康军, 李志军, 曾东方, 陈颖, 卢科良, 朱敏, 龚燕秀. 川中北部磨溪—高石梯地区地层水特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 54-62.
[5] 何绪全, 黄东, 赵艾琳, 李育聪. 川中地区大安寨段页岩油气储层测井评价指标体系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 129-137.
[6] 杨美华, 钟海全, 李颖川. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏新型油藏生产指示曲线[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 163-170.
[7] 朱苏阳, 李冬梅, 李传亮, 李会会, 刘雄志. 再谈岩石本体变形的孔隙度不变原则[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 180-188.
[8] 杜金玲, 林鹤, 纪拥军, 江洪, 许文莉, 伍顺伟. 地震与微地震融合技术在页岩油压后评估中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 127-134.
[9] 朱如凯, 崔景伟, 毛治国, 曹正林, 王兴志, 高长海, 刘永福. 地层油气藏主要勘探进展及未来重点领域[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 12-24.
[10] 刘化清, 刘宗堡, 吴孔友, 徐怀民, 杨占龙, 孙夕平, 倪长宽, 康继伦, 王牧, 靳继坤. 岩性地层油气藏区带及圈闭评价技术研究新进展[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 25-36.
[11] 杨凡凡, 姚宗全, 杨帆, 德勒恰提·加娜塔依, 张磊, 曹天儒. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组岩石物理相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 99-108.
[12] 周新平, 邓秀芹, 李士祥, 左静, 张文选, 李涛涛, 廖永乐. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组下组合地层水特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 109-120.
[13] 袁成, 苏明军, 倪长宽. 基于稀疏贝叶斯学习的薄储层预测方法及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 229-238.
[14] 曹思佳, 孙增玖, 党虎强, 曹帅, 刘冬民, 胡少华. 致密油薄砂体储层预测技术及应用实效——以松辽盆地敖南区块下白垩统泉头组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 239-247.
[15] 张艳, 高世臣, 孟婉莹, 成育红, 蒋思思. 致密砂岩储层AVO正演模拟过程中的不确定性分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 120-128.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .