CO2驱酸化溶蚀作用对原油采收率的影响机理

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20200414

岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 136–142.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200414

CO₂驱酸化溶蚀作用对原油采收率的影响机理

孙会珠^1,2,3, 朱玉双^1,2, 魏勇⁴, 高媛^3,5

1. 西北大学大陆动力学国家重点实验室, 西安 710069;
2. 西北大学地质学系, 西安 710069;
3. 西安石油大学石油工程学院, 西安 710065;
4. 中国石油新疆油田分公司风城油田作业区, 新疆克拉玛依 834014;
5. 陕西燃气集团有限公司, 西安 710016

收稿日期:2019-12-28 修回日期:2020-02-27 出版日期:2020-08-01 发布日期:2020-06-16
第一作者:孙会珠(1980-),男,西北大学在读博士研究生,讲师。研究方向为油气田地质与开发。地址:(710065)陕西省西安市雁塔区电子二路18号。Email:sunhz@xsyu.edu.cn
通信作者: 朱玉双(1968-),女,博士,教授,主要从事油气田开发地质及提高采收率方面的教学与科研工作。Email:yshzhu@nwu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
陕西省教育厅重点实验室项目“鄂尔多斯盆地陆相页岩储层微—纳米孔隙结构特征研究”（编号：17JS115）、陕西省自然科学基础研究计划资助项目“致密砂岩微纳米级多孔介质在CO2-原油混相体系下的尺度演化机制及动态预测模型研究”（编号：2019JQ-808）和陕西省教育厅科研计划项目“CO2-原油混相体系沉积颗粒在致密砂岩微—纳米级多孔介质中的流动规律及影响因素”（编号：19JK0670）联合资助

Influence mechanism of acidification on oil recovery during CO₂ flooding

SUN Huizhu^1,2,3, ZHU Yushuang^1,2, WEI Yong⁴, GAO Yuan^3,5

1. State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China;
2. Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China;
3. School of Petroleum Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China;
4. Fengcheng Oilfield Operation Area, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834014, Xinjiang, China;
5. Shaanxi Gas Group Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710016, China

Received:2019-12-28 Revised:2020-02-27 Online:2020-08-01 Published:2020-06-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： CO₂驱酸化溶蚀作用对储层会产生一定程度的伤害。为揭示这种伤害作用对原油采收率的影响机理，选取6块同级别渗透率的岩心样品，在地层温度、压力条件下进行物理模拟实验，通过核磁共振技术评价酸化溶蚀作用对原油采收率的影响机理。实验结果显示，驱替产出流体的pH值低于原始地层水，且通过离子浓度变化发现驱替过程中有长石和碳酸盐矿物发生溶蚀；岩心的渗透率在驱替结束后出现一定程度降低，且反应时间越长，渗透率的降幅越大；岩心样品的最终采收率与反应时间呈反比，反应时间为240 h的岩心样品相比反应时间为0 h的岩心样品，其最终采收率降幅达到27.31%。综合分析认为，CO₂驱长时间的酸化溶蚀反应产物及脱落的黏土颗粒会堵塞孔喉，导致储层渗流能力下降，进而影响CO₂驱的驱油效率及最终采收率。

关键词: CO₂驱, 酸化溶蚀作用, 核磁共振技术, 影响机理, 采收率

Abstract: The acidification of CO₂ can cause damage to the reservoir to a certain extent. In order to reveal the influence mechanism of acidification on oil recovery,six core samples with the same level of permeability were selected for CO₂ flooding tests under the conditions of reservoir temperature and pressure,and then the influence mechanism of acidification on oil recovery was evaluated by NMR technique. The results show that the pH value of the displaced fluids is lower than that of the original formation water,and the change of the ion concentration before and after CO₂ flooding reflects the dissolution of feldspar and carbonate minerals. The permeability of the core samples decreased after CO₂ flooding,and the longer the reaction time,the greater the decrease of permeability. The ultimate recovery factor of the core sample is inversely proportional to the reaction time. The core sample with a reaction time of 240 h was reduced by 27.31% compared to the core sample of 0 h. Comprehensive analysis shows that the long-term acidification and corrosion reaction products of CO₂ flooding and the exfoliated clay particles will block the pore throat,resulting in the decline of reservoir seepage capacity, which in turn affects the displacement efficiency and ultimate recovery factor of CO₂ flooding.

Key words: CO₂ flooding, acidification, nuclear magnetic resonance, influence mechanism, oil recovery

中图分类号:

TE357

孙会珠, 朱玉双, 魏勇, 高媛. CO₂驱酸化溶蚀作用对原油采收率的影响机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 136–142.

SUN Huizhu, ZHU Yushuang, WEI Yong, GAO Yuan. Influence mechanism of acidification on oil recovery during CO₂ flooding[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(4): 136–142.

参考文献

[1] 秦积舜, 韩海水, 刘晓蕾.美国CO₂驱油技术应用及启示.石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(2):209-216. QIN J S, HAN H S, LIU X L. Application and enlightenment of carbon dioxide flooding in the United States of America. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(2):209-216.
[2] 王玉普, 刘义坤, 邓庆军.中国陆相砂岩油田特高含水期开发现状及对策.东北石油大学学报, 2014, 38(1):1-9. WANG Y P, LIU Y K, DENG Q J. Current situation and development strategy of the extra high water cut stage of continental facies sandstone oil fields in China. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2014, 38(1):1-9.
[3] 张德平.CO₂驱采油技术研究与应用现状.科技导报, 2011, 29(13):75-79. ZHANG D P. CO₂ flooding enhanced oil recovery technique and its application status. Science & Technology Review, 2011, 29(13):75-79.
[4] 杨红, 王宏, 南宇峰, 等.油藏CO₂驱油提高采收率适宜性评. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3):140-146. YANG H, WANG H, NAN Y F, et al. Suitability evaluation of enhanced oil recovery by CO₂ flooding. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3):140-146.
[5] 王琛, 李天太, 高辉, 等.CO₂驱沥青质沉积量对致密砂岩油藏采收率的影响机理.油气地质与采收率, 2018, 25(3):107-111. WANG C, LI T T, GAO H, et al. Study on influencing mechanism of asphaltene precipitation on oil recovery during CO₂ flooding in tight sandstone reservoirs. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2018, 25(3):107-111.
[6] 祝春生, 程林松.低渗透油藏CO₂驱提高原油采收率评价研究.钻采工艺, 2007, 30(6):55-57. ZHU C S, CHENG L S. Evaluation of CO₂ flooding in low permeability reservoirs to improve crude oil recovery. Drilling & Production Technology, 2007, 30(6):55-57.
[7] 王琛, 李天太, 高辉, 等.CO₂驱沥青质沉积对岩心的微观伤害机理.新疆石油地质, 2017, 38(5):602-606. WANG C, LI T T, GAO H, et.al. Microscopic damage mechanism of asphaltene deposition on cores during CO₂ flooding. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2017, 38(5):602-606.
[8] 李士伦, 周守信, 杜建芬, 等.国内外注气提高石油采收率技术回顾与展望.油气地质与采收率, 2002, 9(2):1-5. LI S L, ZHOU S X, DU J F, et al. Petroleum geology and recovery efficiency. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2002, 9(2):1-5.
[9] 郭冀隆.二氧化碳地质封存过程中CO₂-水-岩相互作用实验研究.北京:中国地质大学(北京),2017. GUO J L. Experimental studies on CO₂-water-rockinteractions under geological CO₂ storage conditions. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2017.
[10] 王晓宇.埋藏条件下CO₂-地层水-砂岩相互作用实验及其地质应用.南京:南京大学, 2017. WANG X Y. A experimental study of CO₂-formation water-sandstone interactions under burial conditions and its geological applications. Nanjing:Nanjing University, 2017.
[11] 尚庆华, 王玉霞, 黄春霞, 等.致密砂岩油藏超临界与非超临界CO₂驱油特征.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3):153-158. SHANG Q H, WANG Y X, HUANG C X, et al. Supercritical and non-supercritical CO₂ flooding characteristics in tight sandstone reservoir. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(3):153-158.
[12] 马力, 欧阳传湘, 谭钲扬, 等.低渗透油藏CO₂驱中后期提效方法研究.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2):139-145. MA L, OUYANG C X, TAN Z Y, et al. Efficiency improvement of CO₂ flooding in middle and later stage for low permeability reservoirs. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(2):139-145.
[13] 周冰.CO₂流体对泥岩盖层的改造作用——水岩相互作用实验研究//中国地质学会.中国地质学会2015学术年会论文摘要汇编(中册).西安:中国地质学会, 2015. ZHOU B. Reconstruction of mudstone caprock by CO₂ fluid:Experimental study on water-rock interaction//Geological Society of China. Abstracts of the 2015 Annual Meeting of Geological Society of China. Xi'an:Geological Society of China, 2015.
[14] 王琛, 李天太, 赵金省, 等.利用核磁共振技术研究沥青质沉积对低渗储层孔隙结构的影响. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(4):1700-1706. WANG C, LI T T, ZHAO J S, et al. Study on effect of asphaltene precipitation on the pore structure of low permeability reservoir by nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR). Progress in Geophysics, 2018, 33(4):1700-1706.
[15] 李紫晶, 郭冀隆, 张阳阳, 等.砂岩高温超临界CO₂水岩模拟实验及其地质意义.天然气工业, 2015, 35(5):31-38. LI Z J, GUO J L, ZHANG Y Y, et al. High-temperature supercritical CO₂ water-rock simulation experiment of sandstone and its geological significance. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(5):31-38.
[16] ROSS G D, TODD A C, TWEEDIE J A, et al. The dissolution effects of CO₂-brine systems on the permeability of UK and North Sea calcareous sandstones. SPE 10685, 1982.
[17] RYOJI S, THOMAS L. Experimental study on water-rock interactions during CO₂ flooding in the Tensleep Formation, Wyoming, USA. Applied Geochemistry, 2000, 15(3):265-279.
[18] YU Z, LIU L, YANG S, et al. An experimental study of CO₂-brine-rock interaction at in situ pressure-temperature reservoir conditions. Chemical Geology, 2012, 326:88-101.
[19] 于志超.饱和CO₂地层水驱过程中的水-岩相互作用研究.吉林:吉林大学, 2013. YU Z C. An experimental study on water-rock interaction during water flooding in formations saturated with CO₂. Jilin:Jilin University, 2013.
[20] 于志超, 杨思玉, 刘立, 等.饱和CO₂地层水驱过程中的水-岩相互作用实验. 石油学报, 2012, 33(6):1032-1042. YU Z C, YANG S Y, LIU L, et al. An experimental study on water-rock interaction during water flooding in formations saturated with CO₂. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(6):1032-1042.
[21] 于淼, 刘立, 杨思玉, 等.CO₂-盐水-砂岩相互作用实验研究.矿物学报, 2015, 35(增刊1):803. YU M, LIU L, YANG S Y, et al. Experimental study on CO₂-Brine-Sandstone interaction. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2015, 35(Suppl 1):803.
[22] 于淼.CO₂驱油后的流体-岩石相互作用实验//中国矿物岩石地球化学学会.中国矿物岩石地球化学学会第15届学术年会论文摘要集(5).长春:中国矿物岩石地球化学学会, 2015. YU M. Fluid-rock interaction experiment after CO₂ flooding//Chinese Society for Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry. Abstract Collection of Papers of the 15th Annual Conference of Chinese Society for Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry. Changchun:Chinese Society for Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2015.
[23] 王琛, 李天太, 高辉, 等.CO₂-地层水-岩石相互作用对特低渗透砂岩孔喉伤害程度定量评价.西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 32(6):66-72. WANG C, LI T T, GAO H, et al. Quantitative study on the damage degree of CO₂-formation water-rock interaction on pore and throat of ultra-low permeability sandstone. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 32(6):66-72.
[24] 唐梅荣, 张同伍, 白晓虎, 等.孔喉结构对CO₂驱储层伤害程度的影响.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3):113-119. TANG M R, ZHANG T W, BAI X H, et al. Influence of pore throat structure on reservoir damage with CO₂ flooding. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(3):113-119.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

CO₂驱酸化溶蚀作用对原油采收率的影响机理

Influence mechanism of acidification on oil recovery during CO₂ flooding

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	崔传智, 李静, 吴忠维. 扩散吸附作用下CO₂非混相驱微观渗流特征模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 181-188.
[2]	苏皓, 郭艳东, 曹立迎, 喻宸, 崔书岳, 卢婷, 张云, 李俊超. 顺北油田断控缝洞型凝析气藏衰竭式开采特征及保压开采对策[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 178-188.
[3]	刘仁静, 陆文明. 断块油藏注采耦合提高采收率机理及矿场实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 180-188.
[4]	白佳佳, 司双虎, 陶磊, 王国庆, 王龙龙, 史文洋, 张娜, 朱庆杰. DES+CTAB复配驱油剂体系提高低渗致密砂岩油藏采收率机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 169-177.
[5]	李传亮, 王凤兰, 杜庆龙, 由春梅, 单高军, 李斌会, 朱苏阳. 砂岩油藏特高含水期的水驱特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 163-171.
[6]	郭永伟, 闫方平, 王晶, 褚会丽, 杨建雷, 陈颖超, 张笑洋. 致密砂岩油藏CO₂驱固相沉积规律及其储层伤害特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 153-161.
[7]	崔永正, 姜瑞忠, 郜益华, 乔欣, 王琼. 空间变导流能力压裂井CO₂驱试井分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 172-180.
[8]	钱真, 李辉, 乔林, 柏森. 碳酸盐岩油藏低矿化度水驱作用机理实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 159-165.
[9]	黄广庆. 离子组成及矿化度对低矿化度水驱采收率的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 129-133.
[10]	唐梅荣, 张同伍, 白晓虎, 王泫懿, 李川. 孔喉结构对CO₂驱储层伤害程度的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 113-119.
[11]	韩培慧, 闫坤, 曹瑞波, 高淑玲, 佟卉. 聚驱后油层提高采收率驱油方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 143-150.
[12]	景紫岩, 张佳, 李国斌, 竺彪, 韩国庆, 刘双双. 泡沫混排携砂解堵机理及影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 154-160.
[13]	尚庆华, 王玉霞, 黄春霞, 陈龙龙. 致密砂岩油藏超临界与非超临界CO₂驱油特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 153-158.
[14]	马力, 欧阳传湘, 谭钲扬, 王长权, 宋岩, 林飞. 低渗透油藏CO₂驱中后期提效方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 139-145.
[15]	杨红, 王宏, 南宇峰, 屈亚宁, 梁凯强, 江绍静. 油藏CO₂驱油提高采收率适宜性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 140-146.